Of course, this is the same mindset (perhaps even same feminists?) who say they would rather be raped than be helped by ”the wrong types”.

swedish feminazis - dont help us if raped by immigrants

'Look closer at the facts on Swedish sex attacks'

Young women with foreign backgrounds in Stockholm in 2015. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

‘Look closer at the facts on Swedish sex attacks’

Published: 09 Feb 2016 07:49 GMT+01:00

Since the start of the year, Sweden has witnessed a storm of reports about sexual offences and other crimes against women and girls by men who are assumed by the media to be from the migrant community.
This followed the events in Cologne on New Year’s eve and claims of a police cover-up at a Stockholm music festival which emerged shortly afterwards.
The media has reported on a near daily basis about crimes against women and girls in the streets and in public baths, both in Sweden and elsewhere in Europe.
But when analysing these events, we need to begin by sorting out some statistical pitfalls. It would be refreshing for those engaged in this debate to observe the statistics, thus avoiding prejudice and stereotyping.

More here.


This is how to handle the lying, miserable and very tard orientated media.

Brian of London @ Israellycool caught the entire thing in a YT vid, here’s the story:

Can you criticise Islam or Mohammad in Qatar? No.

Tommy Robinson, one of the organisers of Pegida UK, appeared on Al Jazeera this evening in a panel discussion. But this 3 minute clip includes the part Al Jazeera cut out. You’ll see why when you hear it. And all that follows a pretty pathetic trick the presenter tries to pull by switching the Koran for the Hebrew bible!

Here’s more, from the same debate broadcast I captured and YT’d


Like I said, we have the same problem with these frauds as others do elsewhere in Europe.

refugee youths in finland with beards

Age-test results: 60 per cent of underage asylum seekers revealed to be adults

Yle says in the news that an age-test took place in Finland last year for 149 minor asylum seekers, of which 90 were found to be adults. Age testing made an assessment of teeth and bones of the hand and wrist.

Official sources told Finnish news broadcast last week that age-proof was made ​​last year for about 300-400 minor asylum seekers.

Full beard and gray hair

According to the Finnish Immigration Service Asylum Unit Director, Esko Repo , the age of minors are investigated if there are obvious grounds for the applicant because of physical attributes. According to him, these criteria can be having a full beard and gray hair.

Repo told Suomen Uutiset, that the forensic aging testing typically has a two-year slide.

– For example, the answer may be “not less than 17 years old but not more than 19-year-old.” For such a result the applicant is placed with minors seeking asylum. However, if the result is “at least 19 years of age”, is that clear and the applicant is placed in the reception center for adults.

In borderline cases the case is decided in favor of the applicant.

Suomen Uutiset.fi



He completely tries to circumvent the question.

H/T: Brian of London

Tommy Robinson Goes Head-To-Head With Muslim Caller

Friday 5th February 2016

This is the moment that Tommy Robinson clashed with a Muslim caller live on LBC ahead of an anti-Islam march through Birmingham.

The former EDL leader, now an activist with Pegida, called LBC as we discussed the planned protest tomorrow, one of 14 taking place across Europe.

While he was on, Nick Ferrari also took a call from Balal, who was furious with Mr Robinson’s comments – and their row got very feisty.



Only a hard core idealogue could look at the Muslim sex attacks in Cologne and see no connection between it and the mass migration of muslim settlers. What buffoons.

Either way it spells bad for their pet project of mono-culture Islam being a model example for multiculturalism. If those muslims responsible for the mass rapes/sex assault on NYE in Cologne and elsewhere were already residents in these host countries, their stay hasn’t moderated their behavior one iota.

EU leaders insist there is ‘NO LINK’ between the migrant crisis and New Year sex attacks in Cologne – and vow to bring about an end to ‘false accusations’ 

There is 'no link' between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe. Above, fireworks were thrown into the New Year's crowd outside Cologne's main station, prompting members of the public to flee
Some of the attacks are believed to have been carried out after fireworks were thrown into the New Year's crowd outside Cologne's main station, prompting members of the public to flee

There is ‘no link’ between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe. Above, fireworks were thrown into the New Year’s crowd outside Cologne’s main station, prompting members of the public to flee.

  • European Commission wants to ‘unconditionally reject’ link, minutes show
  • Officials are also growing concerned about possibility of a public backlash 
  • Hundreds of women filed sexual assault complaints after wave of attacks 
  • Internal minutes were taken at a cabinet meeting for officials on January 13

There is ‘no link’ between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe.

The European Commission wants to remove ‘false associations’ between the increasing number of some criminal acts and the arrival of migrants, documents show.

Internal minutes taken at a cabinet meeting on January 13 suggest officials are also growing concerned about the possibility of a public backlash in relation to the attacks.


Like I said earlier, we have the exact same problem here in Finland as well, just take a look at these supposed 14-17 year olds at a sporting event for ‘youths’ sponsored by a Finnish reception center for under age children.

refugee youths.......in finland

Just how old do you think these migrant ‘children’ are? Alarming pictures of refugees – including ‘the fastest 14-year-old in Sweden’ – that shed light on a growing scandal amid Europe’s asylum crisis 

Migrant 'children' pictures that shed light on growing scandal amid asylum crisis

Examine the three ‘children’ in these pictures. One is of Ahmad Farid, who claimed he was 16 but appears at least 18 or more in the snap in which he is laughing as he’s given a fluffy toy polar bear at a refugee reception centre (top left). The second is of Saad Alsaud (main), reported to have been the fastest 14-year-old in Sweden, dwarfing schoolboys and girls as they join him for a run.

The other shows a Somalian named Youssaf Khaliif Nuur who claims he is 15 though he is 6ft tall and, according to one unconfirmed source, shaves his beard and moustache (bottom left). The word has spread across Europe about how easy it is to be accepted as a child migrant in Sweden. Now, the country has become overwhelmed with ‘unaccompanied minors’ in what critics suspect is a huge fraud.

More here.


It’s time to take a serious look at those (and marginalize them) who level the charges of “bigot and xenofauxbe”, than at their targets.

They champion the very type of people most likely to openly violate the morals and values they pretend to uphold and fight for. That’s the price they’re willing for society to pay in their pursuit of radically changing society to conform to their radical, utopian based ideology.

NOTE: It’s why they can on one hand, insist that they fight against Jew hatred (anti-semitism) and on the other, promote the full scale invasion of Jew hating muslims.

PC brigade ‘failing victims of sex abuse’: Minorities tsar slams liberals over Muslim criminals 

Louise Casey said some British officials were 'so wrapped up in political correctness' they ignored shameful scandals which led to vulnerable women and children being harmed across the country

Louise Casey said some British officials were ‘so wrapped up in political correctness’ they ignored shameful scandals which led to vulnerable women and children being harmed across the country

  • David Cameron’s integration tsar has blasted ‘hand-wringing’ liberals 
  • Says they fail to tackle forced marriage and abuses in Muslim communities
  • Louise Casey said some officials are ‘wrapped up in political correctness’
  • She’s carrying out review of how to boost integration for isolated groups

David Cameron’s integration tsar has blasted ‘hand-wringing’ liberals for failing to tackle forced marriage and other abuses in Muslim communities.

Louise Casey said some officials were ‘so wrapped up in political correctness’ they ignored shameful scandals which led to vulnerable women and children being harmed.

Miss Casey, who chaired the Government’s troubled families unit and led an investigation into social services in Rotherham – where Asian sex gangs had abused as many as 1,600 children – is carrying out a review of how to boost integration in the most isolated communities.

Commissioned by the Prime Minister, this is looking at how to help migrants learn English, as well as other ways of boosting women’s job prospects.

But Miss Casey claimed one issue was that the liberal elite had turned a blind eye to problems within some Muslim groups.

Read more:


I like the pick up on Baron Bodissey’s coined term of ‘wacist’.

The whole wristband brouhaha, is brainstorm of Leftist malcontents who have been the driving force behind the smearing of those who have been highlighting the mass migration of the muslim settler movement. This is a non-issue, but the Left loves drama, misinformation and the spreading of lies to paint their opposition in any which way that they can to achieve their goals.

‘Waycist Wristbands’: The Extremism-Linked, Foreign Funded Activists Behind The ‘Nazi Migration Policy’ Story

Watching the news this morning you’d have thought we were actually labelling migrants and asylum seekers in the United Kingdom with big yellow stars, then prodding them off to the gas chambers. Wristband Macht Frei – the new slogan of the UK Home Office, if the one-sided media reports are to be believed.

People – and I say “people” – I really mean wealthy, hard-left, “open borders” activists are apoplectic that a Home Office service provider has asked asylum seekers in Wales to wear wristbands so they’d know which meals to give them for free. I’m sure a lot of you reading this wouldn’t mind wearing a wristband for three free meals a day – but that’s besides the point. Let’s look at the facts behind this story, and more importantly, the groups involved and their funding.

Screen Shot 2016-01-25 at 11.31.18

Lynx House – otherwise known as “Immigration Alley”


It is quite clear from the outset that the crimes the asylum seekers are alleging – mainly being shouted “go back to your country” at – are a load of old cobblers. They claim that they’re being abused by people driving past, because they’re identifiable by the wristbands. But I would suggest – whether it’s right or wrong – that they’re probably more likely being identified because they’re gathered in large numbers outside Lynx House – rented for them with our taxpayer money – causing a “nuisance”. There’s more about that here,but according to a neighbour of the hotel: ‘They are a nuisance just hanging around all day long with nothing to do. They congregate outside and clog up the pavements but apart from that they don’t seem to be any trouble”.

This isn’t a symptom of “racism”, but rather frustration – perhaps not constructively put across – by hard working locals who see their roads being turned into “Asylum Street” or “Immigration Alley” (their words, not mine) – in turn a symptom of the UK’s flimsy border control, left-wing activism, and the European Court of Human Rights’ demands that Britain accept all those “entitled to a family life” into Britain


This is all you need to know about ”Ali”:

Ali left his family behind in Samarra, and both he and Linnéa have followed news of Islamic State advances in the area over the last few months with concern. So why didn’t Ali bring his family with him to Europe? “Put them in a rubber boat on the open sea? At the mercy of the people smugglers? They are my children! I would never take that kind of risk,” Ali answers.

The point here is that he wasn’t ”fleeing to safety”, he could have taken his family to any number of refugee camps dotting the region. No, his whole mission was to GO TO EUROPE, not to rescue his family from a catastrophic situation or certain death. The fake journos at YLE couldn’t even figure that one out for themselves, that is if they were even curious.

The point being here is, that the Finnish people are paying a hefty sum for the ”free help” to service Linnéa Myttinen, the man in question shouldn’t be in the country at all. His only intention was to take advantage of the situation and join the throng who have always wanted to migrate to the European continent, then apply for his family to join him. These are not refugees, but economic tourists/colonizers.

Iraqi asylum seeker lends a hand: The story of Ali and Linnéa

Ali ja Linnéa keittössä kahvilla.

Linnéa Mynttinen is an 80-year-old Finnish pensioner who still actively participates in church and veteran events and attends functions for the hearing impaired. Ali Kamil al-Sammarnaie is a 36-year-old asylum seeker from Samarra, Iraq, a father of two who is trained as a statistician and IT engineer. When Linnéa contacted her local Evitskog asylum seeker reception centre to ask if someone there would be able to help her get around, Ali answered the call.

Linnéa bought a cake to celebrate on the day Ali heard he had been granted asylum in Finland.Image: Jyrki Ojala / Yle

“I needed a little help,” explains Linnéa Myttinen, a pensioner from the southern city of Kirkkonummi whose legs had become weak. Christmas was coming and she wasn’t sure she would be able to cope on her own. All autumn she had been moving around in a wheelchair, but leaving home had started to become a near impossible chore.

“I asked a taxi driver once if one of the asylum seekers could maybe help me out. I didn’t even know then if the centre housed men or women,” Linnéa remembers.

She contacted the centre, which quickly sent a young Iraqi man to her assistance. Linnéa said that she knew from the first moment she looked in Ali’s eyes that they would get along.

More here.

NOTE: No man leaves his family in danger while he chuckles it up in a foreign land, this is all pure fraud, and fraudulent YLE can’t even figure it out that they’re proving exactly that. What a bunch of losers.


She has nothing to say about the ideology of post-hijra Islam (the 2nd act of Mo) which makes any such move totally irrelevant to the health of any society.


She looks better in egg……

Muslim peer: Axe minarets to make new UK mosques look ‘quintessentially English’ so they ‘fit in’  

  • Tory chairman Baroness Warsi says many mosques in Britain are ‘ugly’
  • Says minarets are no longer needed as call to prayer is on loud speaker
  • Thinks that without minarets, mosques could look like village churches 

New mosques should be built without minarets to make them look ‘quintessentially English’ and fit in with the landscape, according to former Tory chairman Baroness Warsi.

Warsi, Britain’s first Muslim Cabinet Minister, is to launch a nationwide competition to design a new mosque as part of a campaign to boost religious tolerance.

She claimed many of those in Britain are ‘ugly’, and that if new ones were built without minarets they could even look like a traditional village church. She also said the aim of her idea was to develop an ‘authentic British Islamic brand’.

Baroness Warsi, Britain’s first Muslim Cabinet Minister, says new mosques should be built without minarets to make them look ‘quintessentially English’ and fit in with the landscape

Baroness Warsi, Britain’s first Muslim Cabinet Minister, says new mosques should be built without minarets to make them look ‘quintessentially English’ and fit in with the landscape

Baroness Warsi said historically, the function of the tower on mosques was to issue the call to prayer. Now the call is made by a loudspeaker, so Minarets (pictured on the Central London Mosque) are no longer necessary

Baroness Warsi said historically, the function of the tower on mosques was to issue the call to prayer. Now the call is made by a loudspeaker, so Minarets (pictured on the Central London Mosque) are no longer necessary

‘We need a debate about what British Islam will look like in ten years’ time,’ she told The Mail on Sunday.

‘There is a saying in Islamic thinking that Islam is like a river that takes the colour from the bed over which is flows, the bed being the country in which it is found. Here, the river of Islam flows over an English river bed and so it should reflect its colour.’

Historically, the function of the tower on mosques was to issue the call to prayer. Now the call is generally made with a loudspeaker.

More here.

Man and a minaret


This is rich.

It’s rich because the death panel claim is true, and that the Obama administration and Dem operatives in general have used every trick in the book to fool the American people to swallow Obamacare in whole, and they keep refusing to do so, in spite of the Democrat Info-war memes they keep burping up.

Officials train info-war American expertise helps: Never repeat a false claim

Jed Willard (left.) And Adam Berinsky designed by Finnish officials information skills training 18 january 2016. Jed Willard (. Left) and Adam Berinsky planning information skills training for Finnish officials 18 january 2016. Image: Yle

About a hundred government officials this week have been delving into modern information influencing with the help of American expertise. Behind closed doors the clarification of Finland’s own message has been practiced. The most concrete piece of advice is not to repeat what is viewed as a false allegation.


Do not repeat the wrong information

Massachusetts University of Technology, MIT Professor of Political Science, Adam Berinsky, who has researched formulation of public opinion and dissemination, gives one concrete piece of advice: information considered to be wrong is never worth repeating.

– The argument may be familiar to the hearer, and it may be the only thing he remembers from your message, Berinsky guides.

Berinsky cites as an example the US health reform, around which rumors swelled loosely when it was alleged, for example, that it would bring death sentences to the elderly.

– Repeating rumors will not help get your message across, but it may on the contrary increase their power, Berinsky warns.


The trouble with that is, it’s indeed a fact that costs are taken into account in how to access the care of the elderly in Obamacare through (death) panels. They alone decide who is viable enough to receive care (as opposed to doctors on the scene) through setting policy in a traditional one size fits all, cookie cutter, big government bureaucratic kind of way.

Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber quite correctly attributed the passage of Obamcare to “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter” – because it turns out that Obamacare will ration care, and that the most well-respected bodies in terms of health rationing have already recommended cutting off services.

The US Preventive Services Task Force is an independent body authorized by Congress to make “evidence-based recommendations about clinical preventive services such as screenings, counseling services, or preventive medications.” And since the onset of Obamacare discussions, the Task Force recommendations for treatment and screening have become less and less generous. In November 2009, the Task Force recommended that mammography for women every other year between the ages of 50 and 74. They admit that they have insufficient information to suggest that it would be fruitless to screen after 74, and they say that case-by-case screenings should take place before 50.

The Mayo Clinic, by contrast, recommends annual mammograms for women above age 40; so too does the American Cancer Society. As Dr. Sandhya Pruthi of the Mayo Clinic writes, “Findings from a large study in Sweden of women in their 40s who underwent screening mammograms showed a decrease in breast cancer deaths by 29 percent.”


War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

Only the fringe of society watches these shows, so I can’t say just how far reaching this lying turd bucket in a scarf’s words will resonate throughout the country. But it’s never a good thing when liars are not confronted over their deceptions, being given a platform to spew their propaganda.


Sharia advocate goes on the Daily Show to explain why Islamic oppression of women is, hey, really cool.

Robert Spencer

Dalia Mogahed, formerly Barack Obama’s adviser on Muslim affairs, appeared on Trevor Noah’s sinking-like-a-stone Daily Show last week, to explain to a worshipful Noah and an adoring audience that the hijab represented nothing more or less than the “privatization of women’s sexuality” – and who on earth but the most benighted lout could possibly be against that? The burning outrage of Mogahed’s words was probably missed by most Daily Show viewers. It should not be missed by FrontPage readers.

“The privatization of women’s sexuality.” A well-constructed and extraordinarily clever phrase, to be sure. With it, Mogahed suggests that the only people who could possibly object to women wearing hijabs are those who want to objectify women as sexual commodities. In this, we glimpse the subtle manipulation by which Islamic supremacists such as Mogahed have co-opted and silenced feminists whom one might otherwise have expected to have stood up against the Sharia oppression of women. How can one stand with the objectifiers, the pornographers, the users, the haters, against those who simply want to “privatize” their sexuality?

The audience loved this. Noah ate it up. But there are a few audiences before whom Mogahed’s extremely clever act might not play quite as well as it did before the Daily Show. Aqsa Parvez’s Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it. Aqsa might have a few choice words for Dalia Mogahed about “privatization” of her sexuality. And then there was Amina Muse Ali, who was a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab. Forty women were murdered in Iraq in 2007for not wearing the hijab. They might wish that their sexuality had been a trifle less “privatized” – at least enough for them to be able to continue to breathe air.

More here.


Who would you rather believe, four separate personal accounts of a same-like conversation with this woman, or the she-devil herself?

On that same day, a State Department official in Tripoli, Libya, wrote to Washington to say that ‘it is becoming increasingly clear that the series of events in Benghazi was much more terrorist attack than a protest which escalated into violence.’

And while the inflammatory video had made waves outside of Libya, the writer added, ‘we want to distinguish, not conflate, the events in other countries with this well-planned attack by militant extremists.’ 

But Clinton, still secretary of state, told four different relatives of the fallen that the filmmaker would be held responsible, according to their public statements. Another week would pass before she publicly referred to Benghazi as a terrorist event.

Charles Woods, whose son Ty Woods was a Benghazi casualty, told The Weekly Standard in October that he had written down Clinton’s words, verbatim, in his notebook, as she spoke.

Reading from it, he recalled what Clinton had told him: ‘We are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son.’

Who’s lying about Benghazi? ‘Not me!’ says Hillary Clinton as she insists she never told victims’ families the terror attack began as protest over an anti-Islam video

NOT LYING: Hillary Clinton suggested to a New Hampshire newspaper that family members of Benghazi terror attack victims aren't truthful when they say she told them an Internet video was responsible for their loved ones' deaths

NOT LYING: Hillary Clinton suggested to a New Hampshire newspaper that family members of Benghazi terror attack victims aren’t truthful when they say she told them an Internet video was responsible for their loved ones’ deaths

  • Clinton told a newspaper’s editors that she never told Benghazi victims’ families that an anti-Muslim YouTube video had sparked the deadly attacks 
  • Four of them have said otherwise – including the father of one of the fallen who wrote Clinton’s words verbatim in a notebook
  • ‘Somebody is lying,’ a columnist told her Wednesday. ‘Who is it?’
  • ‘Not me, that’s all I can tell you,’ Clinton replied, casting blame on the families and attributing any confusion to the ‘fog of war’

Hillary Clinton insists that if anyone is lying about the aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi terror attacks that left four Americans dead, it’s ‘not me.’

More than three years after the fires inside a U.S. diplomatic compound in the Libyan port city died down, the political heat is intensifying again – with Clinton facing tough questions along her road to the White House.

The Daily Sun, a newspaper in rural Conway, New Hampshire, hosted an editorial board meeting with Clinton on Wednesday. Columnist Tom McLaughlin recounted for her the claims of victims’ family members who said she had told them a crude Internet video that mocked the Islamic faith was responsible for inciting the attackers who killed their loved ones.

Clinton has denied making any such statement, despite the accounts of four people. One, the father of a slain CIA security contractor, took written notes of her words.

‘Somebody is lying,’ McLaughlin told her Wednesday. ‘Who is it?’

‘Not me, that’s all I can tell you,’ Clinton replied, casting blame on the families.

Read more:

Hillary marx beer cheer



Cleric denies ties to San Bernardino killers as phone records surface

The cleric acting as spokesman for the San Bernardino mosque where terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook worshipped claims he barely knew Farook and didn’t know his terrorist wife at all. But phone records and other evidence uncovered by federal investigators cast doubt on his story.

The FBI has questioned the cleric, Roshan Zamir Abbassi, about his phone communications with Farook — including a flurry of at least 38 messages over a two-week span in June, coinciding with the deadly Muslim terrorist attack on two military sites in Chattanooga, Tenn.

Abbassi, a Pakistani, insists he had nothing to do with the shooting at a San Bernardino County government building five miles from the mosque. While he confirms the text messages with Farook, he claims they were merely discussing food donations for his Dar-al-Uloom al-Islamiya of America mosque.

More here.


From The Gates of Vienna:

That Maajid is telling Harris that the path forward for Islamic reform is to have new ‘interpretation’ (tafsir) of scripture should be very troubling to Harris. This kind of interpretation in Islam is only permitted to the learned scholars of Islam. It is not a democratic notion, with everyday Muslims reading scripture for themselves. Rather, Nawaz’s stated position on Islamic reform is basically “let’s leave it to the ulama to give us new tafsirs. That will result in a reformed Islam.” This indicates that he is not willing to really break with orthodoxy in Islam, and make Islam open to lay Muslims to read for themselves, in their own languages, the way that William Tyndale, who was burned at the stake for daring to translate the Bible into English, insisted on for his fellow Christians.

Maajid Nawaz: Stealth Jihadist Exposed

Maajid Nawaz is a prominent “moderate” or secular Muslim and the founder of the Quilliam Foundation in Britain. His organization was featured briefly in this space two years ago, when Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll left the EDL and teamed up with Quilliam just before Tommy’s trial (see these three posts from October 2013 for more on Tommy Robinson and Quilliam).

The following exposé by Vikram Chatterjee examines the extensive use by Maajid Nawaz of untruths, dissimulation, evasions, and misleading statements in his writings about Islam. In these he reveals himself to be a practitioner of taqiyya, tawriya, and kitman, the time-honored Islamic doctrines of lying and sacred misdirection.

Update: Mr. Chatterjee has cross-posted this article to his own blog, where you will find his further thoughts on Maajid Nawaz.

Maajid Nawaz: Stealth Jihadist Exposed
by Vikram K. Chatterjee

Thanks in part to the help of Douglas Murray, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Sam Harris, Prime Minister David Cameron and others, Maajid Nawaz has acquired an undeserved reputation as a secular liberal. Despite his outward facade of secularism and liberalism, Nawaz is in fact a deeply devout Sunni Muslim supremacist, operating far behind enemy lines in the Dar al-Harb, the House of War. Nawaz, to fulfill his duties as a Muslim, is waging a campaign of stealth Jihad in order to further the cause of Islam by making himself appear friendly and open to the Infidels of the West while simultaneously carrying out a campaign of mass deception about Islam itself. His goal is to weaken any resistance to the conquest of the Infidel lands of the West by publicly spreading disinformation about the faith, about its many ways of conquest, and deceiving his audience about the doctrinal details of Islam itself. While this may seem like a preposterous claim to make, it merely reflects the ordinary reality of stealth Jihad.

In what follows, Nawaz’s campaign of deception will be demonstrated.

Maajid Nawaz’s not-so-subtle threats of decapitation

The first thing to be said is that Nawaz is easily shown to have deployed threatening, jihad-tinged language after he supposedly became a secular liberal. In July of 2012, Nawaz’s bookRadical: My Journey Out of Islamist Extremism was published by WH Allen. The book purports to be a memoir in which Nawaz describes his youth in Essex, how he joined the Sunni supremacist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, and how he became a political prisoner in Egypt where he supposedly had a revelation in which he saw that “Islamism”, or variously “Islamist extremism” was a divisive political ideology, and decided to leave it (but not, crucially, Islam itself), becoming a secular liberal. Fifteen months later, in October 2013, a year and a half after the UK publication of Nawaz’ memoir, Tommy Robinson quit the English Defense League, the organization which he started, out of fear that its ranks were swelling with neo-Nazis. He embraced Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam Foundation instead, accepting at the time their claims of secularism to be genuine. In an email obtained by Huffington Post Assistant News Editor Jessica Elgot, Nawaz described this event as the “UK’s largest right-wing street movement — the EDL — is being decapitated.”[1] (emphasis added)

Interesting choice of words, no? Why would the “former Islamist extremist” Maajid Nawaz use such threatening, jihad-tinged language? Could his secular liberalism be a clever sham? As we shall see, turning to the book he co-authored with Sam Harris, the evidence shows Nawaz is cold and calculating in his bald-faced telling of untruths, repeatedly deploying outrageous falsehoods about Islam.

The lies of Maajid Nawaz in Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue

Published in October 2015, Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue purports to be a conversation between two liberals, one an acknowledged atheist and secularist, the other a supposedly nominal Muslim. The goal of the book seems to be to find a way of talking about Islam and its attendant problems in a polite way, and search for a path for a kind of Islamic secularism. Harris, apparently convinced of Nawaz’ liberalism and secularism, entered into the “dialogue” with him in October 2014. In an article entitled “Can Liberalism Be Saved From Itself”, Harris wrote what will prove to have been a fateful sentence:

Whatever the prospects are for moving Islam out of the Middle Ages, hope lies not with obscurantists like Reza Aslan but with reformers like Maajid Nawaz.[2]

Harris called Aslan an obscurantist, yet turning to his book with Nawaz, on page 44 we find Nawaz saying, of Sayyid Qutb, the notorious Muslim Brotherhood leader, theologian and author of Milestones, and In The Shade of the Qur’an, whose zealous career was a primary force in creating the modern Islamic movements to restore the Caliphate, that “the Egyptian regime killed him for writing a book”.

This is a straightforward falsehood. Notoriously, Qutb was executed by the Egyptian state for his alleged involvement in an attempt to assassinate Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser.[3] By saying that Qutb was executed for merely writing a book, Nawaz portrays Qutb as a devout Muslim as an innocent victim, a tried and true tactic of Islamic propaganda. It seems highly unlikely that Nawaz is unaware of the real reason for Qutb’s execution, given that Nawaz spent four years at the same prison in which Qutb was held, Mazra Tora.

Moving on, on page 61 of the book, Harris brings up the important point of Qur’anic literalism:

I want to ask you about this, because my understanding is that basically all “moderate” Muslims — that is, those who aren’t remotely like Islamists, or even especially conservative, in their social attitudes — are nevertheless fundamentalists by the Christian standard, because they believe the Qur’an to be the literal and inerrant word of God.

Excellent question, Sam. Do mainstream Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the literal and inerrant word of God? What is Nawaz’s reply?

Well, Nawaz’s three-page reply on pages 61-64 gives no answer whatsoever to this question. He avoids it entirely, beginning with the evasive phrase “I think we have to be careful to avoid two mistakes…” and so on. Nawaz then goes on a curious series of tangents, offering up entertaining thoughts about the meaning of the term literal, which is apparently a big mystery. He then turns down a series of historical side tracks about the Mu’tazilites, Iranian philosophy, and the Council of Nicaea before telling us, in answer to the question of whether the Qur’an was created by God that he “won’t take theological stances here”.

Having done all that, on page 64 Nawaz drops the arresting phrase “because there is no clergy in Islam”, apparently confident that Harris and the reader have never heard of the ulama. Nawaz finishes by stating that “My role is to probe and ask skeptical questions about interpretive methodology, Muslim history, identity, politics, policy, values, and morality”, a job description that apparently does not include answering straightforward questions like “Do Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the literal and inerrant word of God?” The reader ends up finding no definitive answer to this salient question, which is curious, since Nawaz is supposedly an honest secularist and liberal who should be eager to answer simple questions. That Harris cannot bring himself to press Nawaz on this important point, or catch Nawaz’s lie about there being “no clergy in Islam” demonstrates his inadequacy to the task at hand.

More here.


So islam is not related to terrorism, but if you speak out against islam it will create terrorism. Got it.

“The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create”.


Who cares what a little upstart marxist has to say anyways? It’s one of the reasons why I never jumped on the ”Malala bandwagon”. That she’s running defense for Islam only underlines my common sense decision to consider her irrelevant on any given subject.

Malala Yousafzai urges people not to blame Muslims for terrorism as it ENCOURAGES ISIS

THE teenage Nobel prize-winner Malala Yousafzai has urged people not to blame all Muslims for terrorism as it just helps terrorists recruit more jihadis.


 recent comments to ban all MuslimsGETTY

The inspiring young superstar even criticised Donald Trump’s recent comments to ban all Muslims

The inspiring young superstar even criticised Donald Trump’s recent comments to ban all Muslim immigration from the US.

She said the controversial United States presidential hopeful “could radicalise more terrorists” as the 18-year-old Pakistani campaigner urged politicians to think carefully before speaking.

She said that the rise in Islamophobia seen since the Paris terror attacks and San Bernandino shooting in California would only make matters worse.The education activist added: “I can just highlight one thing.

“The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.

“If your intention is to stop terrorism, do not try to blame the whole population of Muslims for it because it cannot stop terrorism.”

More here.



That was quick………

I’m of the opinion that we shouldn’t care what the Islamic State, or any other Islamo-tardic organization has to say about us in the West, they should never be used as an indicator of how we live or should behave.

That said, in the context of Hillary Clinton’s bloviations on Donald Trump being a “recruiter for Islamic State terrorists (which is right on par with the Left blaming Israel for world terrorism because it refuses Islam’s determination to destroy it), it’s entirely fair to highlight who the Islamic State itself highlights….her bulbous nosed, serial rapist of a husband.

Bill Clinton Stars As ‘Fornicator’ In Islamic State Propaganda Video

Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s husband Bill Clinton is disparagingly featured as a “fornicator” in an Islamic State propaganda recruitment film.

Clinton is under fire for comments she made in Saturday’s Democratic debate, in which she claimed that the Islamic State is using videos of Donald Trump talking about Muslims in their terrorist propaganda videos. That statement turned out to be false.

Instead, the group known as ISIS is recruiting people based on their hatred of Bill Clinton’s extramarital affairs and the marriage rights of American homosexuals.

A recent Islamic State video “No Respite,” released in advance of the holiday season, calls for the creation of an Islamic caliphate. “Not a secular state built on man-made laws whose soldiers fight for the interests of legislators, liars, fornicators, corporations, and for the freedom of Sodomites,” the ad states, showing Bill Clinton as the “fornicator.”

More here.



The Shiites who have a long bloody history with the Sunnis know all is not what it appears to be.

The rest of us on the outside do not trust either of them, and most would wish the whole subject would be quashed entirely. The Saudis are finding this and all parties concerned, inside and outside know for a fact that they’ll have strings attached, and from our point of view, it matters little which side is pushing an Islamic agenda, western society suffers as a result.

NOTE: It’s been said that: “The more Islam you have, the less freedom you have”. That truism is factual long before it was first uttered. Anas Hajjar is a lying piece of you know what.

Anas Hajjar imaami IMG_2015_00426334

The mosque is open to all


Helsingin sanomat newspaper


We are ready to cooperate with all Islamic communities and Resalat (TT:Shiite) is no exception to this rule.

We have clearly shown to all that this is to be a Sunni Mosque, which is open to everyone. The religious policy of the Central Mosque will be a moderate Islamic one. The aim is to promote peace and dialogue

The entirety will be administered by a Finnish foundation. The administration will also have non-Muslims.

Donors are motivated by charity which according to Islam is historical. Funding sources are going to continue to communicate openly, and we are ready to take the funding received from all who do not set the terms of issue of money.

Anas Hajjar
Finnish Islamic Council (Sine)
Pia Jardi
project leader
Multifunctional Centre and Mosque project


NOTE II: Rest assured that if this monstrosity is allowed to be built, it will be a fully Saudi Islamic supremacist run operation, and anyone not in line with their project will get the boot. It’s nothing more than a big dawa project to convert Finns to Islam and push Saudi agendas.