HELSINGIN SANOMAT: MUSLIM JOURNALIST INFILTRATES ISIS TERROR CELL, CONCLUDES THEY’RE ”FRUSTRATED LADS, NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM”…….

Alternative headline: HELSINGIN SANOMAT SAYS GERMAN YOUTH IN FRANCE JOINED THIRD REICH DUE TO FRUSTRATION, HITLER’S MEIN KAMPF/HITLER PLAYED ABSOLUTELY NO ROLE…….

Don’t believe your lying eyes, Islam has nothing to do with ISIS, and “War is peace. Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength”!

Lenin_reading_Pravda

What’s laughable is the journalist freely admits that Mohamed’s ”brothel in the sky” message was one of the recruiting tools used to entice these sex-starved males to blow themselves up for allah. Hitler plied the young minds of German with all kinds of utopian candy, and no reason minded individual will conclude that national socialism had nothing to do with it.

French journalist infiltrated jihadisti group – “No trace of Islam”

Ruutukaappaus Allahin sotilaat -dokumentin trailerista.

French journalist infiltrated a terrorist attack brooding jihadisti cell for half a year and described them with the hidden camera.

FOREIGN COUNTRIES

FRENCH journalist infiltrated a terrorist attack brooding jihadisti cell for half a year and described its members with the hidden camera.

The result was the “soldiers of Allah”, as a documentary, which will be aired in France on Monday night.

Under the pseudonym of Saïd Ramzi the reporter told of their experiences to the news agency AFP .

He is a Muslim who says he belongs to the same generation as the terrorists in last year’s devastating Paris attack.

“MY GOAL was to understand what was motivating their thoughts,” he says.

“One of the main conclusions is that throughout the activity I have not seen any trace of Islam. I do not see any kind want of changing the world for the better. Only lost, frustrated, self-destructive young people, who are easy to manipulate. “

“Their misfortune was born in the era of the Islamic State. It is very sad. They are young people who are looking for something, and they found this.”

REPORTER managed to contact the group through Facebook. After that, he met with the “emir”, the person called. This lead group consisted of about a dozen young people, some of them born in Muslim families, some converts.

The meeting took place in the outskirts of a town called Châteauroux, which was unoccupied during the winter season.

The “Emir” was a French-Turkish young man named Oussama . The first meeting, he tried to convince the journalist that he could expected paradise if he would do a suicide attack.

“This is the road to paradise”, Oussama says in the video.

“Come, brother, let’s go to paradise. Our women are waiting for us there, and the angels are servants. For the palace, as well as gold and rubies on the winged horse, “he says.

The journalist appeared in the group as Abu Hamza.

THE SECOND meeting in front of the mosque in the suburbs of Paris, one member of the group points to an airplane in the sky approaching the runway.

“With a small rocket launcher you could get that kind of easy … You do something like that in the name of Dawlan [terrorist organization Isis] , and France would be traumatized for a century,” he says.

Oussama is getting in contact with Isis in Syria. He was, however, arrested in Turkey and handed over to France, where he has been five months in prison.

He speaks to attack on the military base, as well as to the media, “as was done to  Charlie.”

In January 2015 the two brothers attacked the satirical journal Charlie Hebdon, killing 12 people in the premises.

THINGS are given new twists, when a person called  Abu Suleiman, returns from Raqqa, the Isis center in Syria. He tells the journalist to come to see him at the train station.

There he is greeted by completely covering niqab dressed woman, holding out a letter to the journalist.

The letter describes the plan of terrorist attacks. To a nightclub, and a command is to shoot “until dead”, waiting for the security forces and will then trigger an explosive belt.

At this point, the authorities close the loop around the group. Several members of the group are arrested, AFP says.

One of the escaped members sends a message to the journalist: “You are lost, dude.”

“At the time the infiltration ended”, Mr Ramzi said.

HS h/t: Johhny Too Bad

EU: OH, ABOUT THOSE 250 000 MUSLIM SETTLERS ON THE HIJRA WHO WEREN’T COUNTED AT ALL……

The EU and their lackeys in member states are lying to the people everywhere…..

muslim surge

It’s not a “silly conspiracy theory” when its happening in front of your face day in and day out.

The 250,000 EU migrants ‘that weren’t counted’: Explosive report says official figures are underestimating number by 50,000 a year meaning migration from inside Europe is now higher than the rest of the world combined

Migrants and refugees cook near a fence at the northern Greek border point of Idomeni

Migrants and refugees cook near a fence at the northern Greek border point of Idomeni

  • Number of EU migrants living in the UK has been undercounted by 250,000
  • Shocking findings were uncovered after analysis of five years of figures 
  • Net migration from inside the EU was around 50,000 a year higher than official statistics admit

The number of EU migrants living in the UK has been undercounted by 250,000 over the past five years, an explosive report claims today.

The study said net migration from inside the EU was around 50,000 a year higher than official statistics admit.

Crucially, it would mean that migration from inside the EU – over which the Government has no control – is now higher than that from the rest of the world combined.

The number of EU migrants living in the UK has been undercounted by 250,000 over the past five years, an explosive report claims today

The number of EU migrants living in the UK has been undercounted by 250,000 over the past five years, an explosive report claims today

Read more:
collapsing EU

FINLAND: ISRAELI ARAB (PROPAGANDIST) SPREADS LIES IN HELSINKI ABOUT MIZRACHI (”ARAB”) JEWS……

First from Prof. Steven Plaut writing at Front Page Magazine in 2014:

Once education and the other explanatory variables are controlled, there is very little difference between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim earnings, and in a few cases, particularly for women, Mizrahim outperform Ashkenazi women. The Ashkenazi-Mizrahi distinction certainly appears to be less important in explaining earnings differences than the distinction between native-born Jews and foreign-born Jews or recent immigrants. Here again, there are differences between men and women. Ashkenazi women slightly underperform Mizrahi women, other things being equal, while Ashkenazi men slightly outperform compared with Mizrahi men. The bottom line is that the data do not support the presumption that Mizrahim are systematically disadvantaged in Israeli labor markets.

It’s highly typical of politically active Arabs abroad painting the situation in Israel in a hysterical light. ”Discrimination and injustices” (real and imagined) that effect every single Western state in existence are highlighted in a extreme light, all because they supposedly take place in Israel. Immediately all sense of proportion and reality are tossed out the window because the Jews are involved.

NOTE: There is absolutely NO excuse for Western journalists in this day and age of the internet, to give an uncritical ear to propagandists. It’s obvious that pseudo journalist Annika Hallström (and her gatekeepers) at the Hufvudstadsbladet deems it to be her duty to spread unsubstantiated bull crap against the Jewish state.

Hufvudstadsbladet Article 14.4.2016 / Translation

A Palestinian artist is not romantic

The refuge is at Suomenlinna. Jowan Safadi in their temporary hemknutar. There is also his temporary studio. PHOTO: CATA PORTIN

By Annika Hällsten

Palestinian musician Jowan Safadi needed a break from the persecution in Israel. In Suomenlinna he found his comfort zone. Jowan Safadi, born in Nazareth, but residing in Haifa, is standing on the Suomenlinna ferry deck and looking happy. Partly (because) the weather is the best possible one morning in April, partly (because) he has a meeting with his Finnish musicians to look forward to.

[…]

Jowan Safadi is the artist in residence and the first participant of the Safe Haven project the City of Helsinki is now paying for. Safe Haven Helsinki offers persecuted artists a respite for a limited time and Jowan Safadi expects to stay in Finland for a maximum of just over four months.

[…]

Arabs who are Jews

“It’s hard to be an Arab in a racist state” sings Jowan Safadi in the song To be an Arab. The song caused a stir when it was published in the summer of 2015. Partly because Safadi sings in Hebrew, partly because the point in the text is directed against the racist Israel. The song is about Mizrahi Jews, i.e. Jews from Arab countries such as Iraq and Morocco.

– We are talking about Arabs with the Jewish religion, Jowan Sawadi explains. After the establishment of the State of Israel, Mizrahi Jews were persuaded to move to Israel but were met there by a different reality than they had imagined.

– In their home countries, the Mizrahi Jews belonged to the elite. In Israel, they were discriminated against and ostracized and treated as slaves because they were Arabs.

– It led to a situation in which they, in their attempts to adapt, became racist against Arabs. How do Mizrahi Jews react to the song?

More at Hufvudstadsbladet

The 1st Secretary of the Israeli Embassy in Helsinki, Arezoo Hersel, responds:

Even today Jews are forced to flee

Israeli agitprops

Hufvudstadsbladet Op-ed 24.5.2016: Even today Jews are forced to flee My fellow countryman, Mr. Jowan Safadi, a guest of the City of Helsinki, presented his version of history and negative interpretation of contemporary Israel in HBL’s interview (14.4.2016). He might represent the fringe of Israeli society, but certainly not its majority. In order to understand these issues, let me mention some major events:

In 1947 the United Nations adopted the partition plan for establishing an Arab State and a Jewish State in what was then the British Mandate of Palestine. It was accepted by the Jews, but rejected by the Arabs. Moreover, the Arab countries started to prepare for war against the future Jewish State.

The Political Committee of the Arab League drafted a law to govern the Jews in Arab countries, about 856,000 Jews, referred to as the “Mizrahi Jews”. It provided, among other things, that Jews suspected to be Zionists would be interned as political prisoners and their assets would be confiscated. Discriminatory legislation against Jews was enacted and pogroms and anti-Jewish riots took place in many countries, for example in Iraq, Libya and Morocco.

When the State of Israel was established in 1948, it was immediately attacked by its Arab neighbors. As a result of the conflict, two refugee groups emerged: Jews from Arab countries and Arabs of Palestine. It is important to note that many Arabs stayed in Israel and became citizens with equal rights under the law.

During its early years, while surrounded by enemies and coping with limited resources, Israel did its utmost to welcome and absorb the immigrants. Unfortunately, the same did not happen for the Palestinians: Arab countries (except Jordan) refused to grant them citizenship and intentionally maintained their status as refugees.

To this day, the hostile policy of most countries in the region towards Israel and Jews continues to force Jews to flee. For example, just last month, nineteen Jews escaped from war-torn Yemen to Israel. Nowadays, only a fraction of the once flourishing Jewish communities is left in the Arab world.

The painful journey of the Mizrahi Jews is not a mere historical fact, but part of my personal history: as a child, I escaped revolutionary Iran with my family and found a safe haven in Israel – the only place I call home. As newcomers, we were received with open arms. I was educated according to the core values of Israel – still the only true democracy in the Middle East – promoting pluralism and fundamental rights for all of its citizens, regardless of their religion, race or gender.

Unfortunately, sometimes these values are misrepresented in Israel and abroad to an extent that distorts history and facts. In democratic countries, such as Israel and Finland, everyone is of course free to express their views, even if they are extreme or offensive. However, attitudes of this nature, do not contribute to better understanding of the conflict and promoting reconciliation. Let’s advance peace through constructive dialogue that will lead to coexistence and brighter future.

Arezoo Hersel

Chargé d’affaires

Embassy of Israel

FPM’S HUGH FITZGERALD DEBUNKS KAPLAN PIECE THAT ”EUROPE WAS DEFINED BY ISLAM”…….

Kaplan is one the useful stooge lackeys who knows little, but pontificates a lot…. 

As for invoking the future threat of the “dementia of ideologies,” what is Kaplan talking about? The only “dementia” apparent in Europe today is that of Muslim migrants in mental thrall to the ideology of Islam and, just as worrisome, the dementia of those non-Muslims who, like Robert Kaplan, fail to see what is staring them in the face – not the promise of a “new Europe” but the threat of a Europe that could be destroyed by the failure of its citizens to recognize, halt, and determinedly turn back, what has now become a Muslim invasion.

ROBERT KAPLAN: ‘EUROPE WAS DEFINED BY ISLAM. AND ISLAM IS REDEFINING IT NOW.’

Is it really Europeans who need to compromise?

Hugh Fitzgerald

Robert Kaplan, a contributing editor to The Atlantic, has just published a piece on Islam and the future of Europe. He claims, startlingly, that Europe “was essentially defined by Islam,” by which he means that before Islam swept across North Africa, Europe consisted of a single civilization, on both banks of the Mediterranean — that of the Roman Empire — and that Islam’s arrival severed “the Mediterranean region into two civilizational halves.” It is true that Muslim conquerors swept across North Africa in the seventh and eighth centuries, but not quite true, pace Kaplan, that they “extinguished Christianity there.”

Millions of Coptic Christians remained a majority in Egypt until the 14th century (that is, for at least 700 years after the time that Kaplan claims Muslim armies “virtually extinguished Christianity” in North Africa). And while it is true that the Roman Empire was sundered, it was not only by the forces of Islam, as Kaplan appears to believe: before the Arab armies arrived, others had been seizing territory from Roman control, including the Visigoths in Spain and the Vandals, who conquered the Roman province of Africa in 433 and held it till 539.

Kaplan quotes with evident approval Jose Ortega y Gasset that “all European history has been a great migration toward the North.” Is that true? The Roman Empire fell because of a great migration of the Germanic tribes from the north and northeast to the South; it was they, the Barbarians, who beat down the steady Roman legions and seized Rome in 476 A.D., with the Germanic warrior Odoacer placed on the throne. And even before the Fall of Rome, the Roman Empire had divided into Eastern and Western Empires, one ruled from Rome, the other from Constantinople. Surely that split was just as significant, for the future of European civilization, with the Western empire embracing Latin Catholicism, and the Eastern empire Orthodox Christianity, as the loss of North Africa to Islam.

Racing through the centuries, Kaplan in the same sentence leaps from “the breakup of the Roman empire” (into East and West, but he says nothing further about the colossal effect of that split) to “that northward migration” which “saw the Germanic peoples (the Goths, Vandals, Franks, and Lombards) forge the rudiments of Western civilization.” This is a doubly bizarre remark, since it was their southern migration which brought the Germanic peoples within the borders of the Roman Empire and ultimately to Rome. And it was the Romans of both the Western and Eastern Empires, not the Germanic tribes, who forged more than the rudiments of Western civilization, including such monumental achievements as, in the Eastern Empire, the Code of Justinian.

Kaplan fleetingly mentions, exactly three times, what should be at the center of any history of Europe: Christianity itself. He writes that the Slavs and Magyars “adopted Christianity,” that European unity began with the concept of a “Christendom” in “inevitable opposition to Islam,” and that Muslims in Europe today “have no desire to be Christians” – and that’s all he has to say on the subject of Europe and Christianity. He does not discuss what Christianity has contributed to forming the European mentality over the last two thousand years, or how it has influenced, even shaped, Europe’s art and music, its literature, its philosophy, its political thought, its more, none of it thinkable without taking into the account the influence of Christianity. Kaplan has Islam on his mind, and were he to do justice to Christianity, his readers might begin to see the sense of insisting that it was not Islam, but Christianity, that “defined Europe.”

[…]

Kaplan several times mentions Edward Said’s book Orientalism favorably, claiming that it set out how “Islam had defined Europe culturally, by showing what it was against. Europe’s identity, in other words, was built in significant measure on a sense of superiority to the Muslim Arab world on its periphery.” What Said mainly tried to do in Orientalism was different: to endow with a new and insidious meaning the word “Orientalist,” which hitherto had referred neutrally to Western scholars of the languages of the Levant (especially Arabic), and of Islam and Islamic civilization. Said claimed that these “Orientalists” studied Arabic as part of a deliberate campaign to justify and help the project of Western imperialism by means of their putatively unsympathetic or hostile treatment of Oriental peoples. The devastating detailed critique of Said’s use of “Orientalism” as a term of polemical abuse, delivered by Bernard Lewis in 1982, and which many considered a knockout blow, apparently has not yet reached Robert D. Kaplan.

More here.

FINLAND: CLAIMS OF RACIAL PROFILING BY ALREADY HAMSTRUNG POLICE…….

I’m one of the first to defend a person’s right to walk or drive the streets of Finland unmolested by the police. 

Let me ask however, how is a cop to check for foreigners illegally here in the country if they can’t look for foreigners here in the country? The illogical Left throws up so many roadblocks (on purpose) in order to thwart the questioning of a suspected perp, because they do not want anyone tossed out of the country. The person literally has to be involved in a crime or infraction of the law for the police to act.

The first priority of any Western government is the protection of its civil society from foreign enemies, the Left have the police so hamstrung that they are not able to effectively carry out their duties. There is a line, and the Left have effectively erased it in their favor.

Police under scrutiny over racial profiling claims

The Non-Discrimination Ombudsman has called on Helsinki police to respond to claims that recent police action has amounted to racial profiling. The Ombudsman says members of the public have complained about being targeted for police checks because of their appearance.

Helsingin poliisi

Helsingin poliisi on tarkastanut ulkomaalaisia ydinkeskustassa.

Police and the Finnish Border Guard have organised a total of four immigration control operations targeting foreigners in central Helsinki. The monitoring exercise allegedly focused on people assumed to be of foreign extraction and involved ID checks.

Non-Discrimination Ombudsman Kirsi Pimiä says she has received complaints about checks targeting foreign nationals, many of whom say they feel they have been wrongly profiled based on their appearance.

The office says it will demand a report from the Helsinki Police Department on its surveillance of foreigners.

Police have right to conduct checks

Legally police retain the right to check whether people from abroad have the right to be in the country. The recent intensification of surveillance measures against foreigners has also stirred feelings of resentment among people following the developments on social media.

“Police have to make sure that ethnic or racial profiling does not occur,” says specialist Robin Harms from the Ombudsman’s office. “It is completely unenlightened to make assumptions based on skin colour in modern Finland.”

When police conduct surveillance of foreigners it should occur openly and according to a precise plan of action. All surveillance should also be documented for later inspection, the specialist notes.

“Nobody should have to experience being chosen for an ID check based on the colour of their skin. If this has happened it is a serious offence and gross misconduct,” says Harms.

Checks effective?

Harms also questions the efficacy of police checks on foreigners.

“It doesn’t seem resource-effective and this has been done in many places, but only a handful of individuals presented any kind of risk in relation to their stay in the country.”

Helsinki police detective Henri Helminen says that immigration monitoring is usually conducted in tandem with other duties. However, in some cases police may do spot checks on people who appear “non-Finnish”.

“In these cases we simply ask them whether or not they are foreigners,” Helminen says.

No need to carry ID

According to Finnish law, people are not obliged to carry proof of identity at all times. If an individual does not have any ID, police may check their information from a centralised database.

If a person has not dealt with Finnish authorities in the past, their information may not be available. In these cases police may enter a person’s home or hotel room to access their papers.

“This depends very much on the circumstances surrounding the encounter. If it’s clearly a case of a tourist, then we would hardly start looking for documents,” Helminen adds.

YLE

FINLAND: IMAM (SHIITE) ASKED ABOUT HANDSHAKES …….

It all depends upon sharia compliance and  whether the Muslim is engaged in stealth practices in order to strategically promote Islamic goals. Giving Islam a ‘modern face’.

This imam is the same one who tried to downplay the murder of homosexuals in Islam on Finnish national TV a few years ago.

abbas bahmanpour 30.10.2013

Islamic etiquette 

Imam Abbas Bahmanpour was asked in the paper about the customs of Finnish Muslims after controversy in Switzerland over a Syrian family’s asylum application, which was reportedly frozen because the family’s two teenage boys refused to shake a teacher’s hand.

“Islam has very strict chastity mandates, one being to avoid all physical contact with the opposite sex,” Bahmanpour says in Ilta-Sanomat. “The line is drawn clearly for clarity. Otherwise many might ask whether hugging is alright if handshakes are, if kissing is allowed if hugging is, and so on.”

Vice chair Pia Jardi of the Islamic Council of Finland says in the piece that Muslims hold different interpretations of the no-touching rule, and that following or refusing to follow Finnish greeting etiquette is a personal choice.

More here

AUSTRALIA: MUSLIM DAWA CRAPAGANDIST INSISTS POST-HIJRA ISLAM (ISLAM 101) NOT PART OF IDEOLOGY…….

Two sides of the same societal jihad coin…..

There is only a nuance in the differing strategies of societal takeover between violent jihadis and adherents of MB Salafism. One group wields a Kalashnikov, the other a computer keyboards and infiltrate the many religious dialogue panels and op-ed columns.

Mark Durie at MEForum

“The Brotherhood is more deceptive in language and appearance than Salafis. Salafis tend to be separatist and can give the impression of being focused upon personal religious piety, which separates them from those who do not share their beliefs. Salafis also tend to speak using pious religious jargon, making few concessions to the communicative norms of others. This is mirrored in their manner of dress, which concedes nothing to secular fashion sense.

In contrast the Brotherhood’s approach is to penetrate and transform western institutions, with the ultimate aim of bringing about the same end as the Salafis. The Brotherhood may seem more pragmatic and accommodating than Salafis, but this is little more than a strategic tactic on their part, not evidence of a fundamental difference in ultimate goals. Brotherhood ideologues can be very skilled in modifying their rhetoric to suit their audience, but this is not an art Salafis have much time for.”

From Down under:

AUSSIE JIHADIS

Australian Muslims speak up

 

Nine men and women from around Australia give voice to what it’s really like to live as a Muslim. Aisha Novakovich, 32, community advocate, law student and mother of two tells of her journey to radicalism and back. Beau Donelly reports.

As a teenager, I had a laminated photo of Osama Bin Laden in my bedroom. A friend once saw the photo and demanded to know why I had it. I told her he was my hero and that I wanted to be one of his wives; that the media was manipulating his image because he was challenging US hegemony.

From the age of 14, I wore the niqab – the full face veil – with gloves. My mother hated it and said I was becoming a fanatic. For me, it became a marker of difference in the face of discrimination. At university I was determined to learn the political systems in the West in order to subvert and challenge them from within. I believed we needed a caliphate. Eventually, I started to flirt with ways I could leave Australia to join the fight against foreign oppressors. Given different circumstances and times, I might have joined a terrorist organisation when I was younger.

More crapoganda here.

Islamophobia gif

ABU DHABI DOO MUSLIM AGITPROP SAYS ”SWEDES MUST REALIZE ONLY SOFT POWER CAN DEFEAT RADICALISM”…….

What a bunch of bull crap…….

Christians and Jews, Hindus and Buddhists all over the world are being persecuted for their faith and ethnicity by Muslims (relying on classical Islamic texts for validation) and do not behave like Muslims. Hindus, Buddhists, Jews and Christians in the US/West are not creating terror cells to carry out attacks on Muslims anywhere that they can find them because, Muslims elsewhere, are murdering their co-religionists. Only Muslims are doing that because the koran and other Islamic texts sanction it.

NOTE: The problem is Islam itself, in particular, Post-Hijra Islam, the Medina period that abrogates the Meccan period. Full stop. Do not be taken in by these propaganda spin-meisters.

‘Swedes must realize only soft power can defeat radicalism’

'Swedes must realize only soft power can defeat radicalism'

File photo: Mstyslav Chernov/Wikimedia

Published: 20 Apr 2016 07:39 GMT+02:00

The pen is mightier than the sword, the old saying goes. The challenge presented by radical Islamic extremism to the civilized world is one that cannot be defeated solely by military means; it is the nature of such radicalism to metastasize and grow when it is physically attacked.

This is because extremism of this sort is based on the belief that Islam is besieged and persecuted by armies of infidels and it is the duty of “true” Muslims to kill in its defense. The fact that the shocking attacks in Brussels last month came just days after the arrest of one of the planners of the recent Paris attacks demonstrates this martyr effect.

Swedes shouldn’t overlook the significance that one of the suspects in the attacks became radicalized in Malmö. Why were ideas grounded in hate and violence more attractive than the tolerance and understanding typically associated with Swedish values?

One source of strength and strategic advantage among these radicals is in their belief that terrorism is sanctioned by God. This is the great “mirage” of extremism and no amount of military hardware can defeat it.

Rather, extremism must die in the battlefield of ideas.

More here.

TARIQ RAMADAN (MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD OPERATIVE) DEFENDS BRUSSELS ISLAMONAZI ATTACK……

The silk tongued jihadi in a suit…….

“MODERATE REFORMER” TARIQ RAMADAN DEFENDS BRUSSELS ATTACK

Daniel Greenfield

Tariq Ramadan was barred from the US under Bush, but Obama threw open the doors for him. Ramadan was billed as a moderate reformer. And here is the “moderate reformer” on the Brussels attacks. After the formality of condemning the attacks, mumbling that terrorism is wrong, Ramadan pivots to the same old song and dance.

We cannot, today, afford to disconnect these events with the violence, terror and death that have long been commonplace in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya, and in Africa and Asia more widely. European and American foreign policy does not happen in a vacuum, as those who target us have repeated in countless videos: You have caused war and death in our countries, now you will suffer the consequences.

Now the “war and death” that ISIS terrorists are talking about is the US and the rest of NATO pushing back against its genocide of Christians, Yazidis and other minorities. Or to put it another way, American intervention against Islamic terror doesn’t happen in a vacuum either. “You have caused war and death in our countries, now you will suffer the consequences.”

But what is Tariq Ramadan really suggesting? That bombing ISIS is wrong?

More here.

JOURNALIST TRIES TO GET MUSLIM TO HONESTLY RESPOND ON THE KORANIC DICTATE FOR DEATH FOR APOSTASY…….

Trying to get a straight answer about Islam from a Muslim is like trying to get a Strawberry malt from the udder of a goat.

FINLAND: PROPAGANDA DOCUMENTARY SPINNING MUSLIMS ON THE HIJRA ”WINS FILM AWARDS”…….

You can get the gist of the flick from the angle of the director:

“I want everyone to understand that we are all people. There is no need to be afraid. If you’re afraid of people, you will be afraid every day. Our society does not need to fear the refugees entering Europe,” Ramezan says.

This, in spite of the ongoing war with Islamonazis of every stripe, the overwhelming majority of outright frauds in the muslim hijra movement, the criminals, the terrorists the rapists etc. etc. were not supposed to fear the importation of people coming inherent tribal muslim nations.

Yeah, that’s exactly what they want you to do.

Finnish refugee documentary wins film awards

Tuntematon pakolainen

Film director Hamy Ramezan and stand up comedian Ali Jahangiri traveled with a vast group of refugees for three weeks and produced a documentary film about their experiences. The film, Refugee Unknown, won two awards at the Tampere Film Festival.

A new documentary directed by Hamy Ramezan and comedian Ali Jahangiri has received the main award for over 30-minute domestic films at the Tampere Film Festival. The film, Refugee Unknown, is a rare look at the Europe-wide asylum seeker migration from the point of view of the refugees themselves.

“I didn’t want my camera to lie at all,” director Ramezan says. “These people are often misrepresented and rendered faceless in the media. Words like ‘flood’ and ‘horde’ are used and there’s a lot of fear-mongering. I knew that wasn’t the whole story and I wanted to show people that and help calm the situation down.”

Ramezan is an accomplished film director, and Refugee Unknown is his first documentary. He says he found the style of the film as an answer to the topic’s needs.

“I wanted the imagery to not be manipulated. I noticed that when you stand still for long enough, life starts to happen right in front of the camera. I didn’t need to seek out what the film needed, those things came on their own,” Ramezan says.

Truth and hardship

The most important thing to both Ramezan and Jahangiri, they say, was for the documentary to reflect the truth. Asylum seekers in the film are neither judged nor idealised. As an example Jahangiri cites a scene where a refugee calls a female European clown performer a whore.

“We had to keep things in the film that were despicable to us. That’s what was most difficult and most important. That guy was a complete jerk and said some absurd things. But we wanted the documentary to be truthful,” Jahangiri exaplains. “We encountered all kinds of people just trying to get by and living their lives.”

Ramezan and Jahangiri traveled with the refugees for three weeks during the shooting of the documentary. Their trip took them from the Greek island of Lesbos to the European continent, and on to Macedonia, Serbia and the border of Austria and Germany, where the so-called “Balkan route” ends.

The filmmakers say they believe the trip was a positive experience for them despite the hardship.

“I want everyone to understand that we are all people. There is no need to be afraid. If you’re afraid of people, you will be afraid every day. Our society does not need to fear the refugees entering Europe,” Ramezan says.

At the Tampere Film Festival in southern Finland, Refugee Unknown recently won the main prize in the category of over 30-minute films. According to the jury, the film “manages to penetrate its politically heated topic and to build a remarkable image of man and humankind.” The film was also voted the audience’s favorite in the national competition.

The documentary Refugee Unknown (Tuntematon pakolainen) will be shown on TV1 on March 21 at 9:30 pm.

yle

FINLAND: LUTHERAN PASTOR WHO SUPPORTS PALESTINIAN TERROR GROUPS……

His name is Ramez Y. Ansara, an Arab ”christian” from the Palestinian Authority who lives in Helsinki, and who regularly propagandizes for the PA.

He was sitting next to me last year during a lecture by Ben-Dror Yemeni at the Helsinki University where he spouted every half truth and lie he could muster during his five (very long) minute rant.

ramez y ansara

Well, it occurred to me today to look at his Facebook page after talking with a friend about him, and here is a picture I found from 2012, I added an enlargement to the actual pic in the background:

ramez y ansara 2

pali flags pic fb ramez y. ansara

The bottom right is the logo for Hamas, the bottom left is for Islamic Jihad, top Left is the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (Palestine), top middle is the PLO, and the top right is Fatah.

Please do note that in the center of the joined hands, is an image of the complete removal of the state of Israel in traditional islamonazi fashion. Oh, and he disseminates fraudulent pics like a supposed IDF soldier standing on the chest of an Arab child.

ramez ansara fraud idf pic

fake idf pic

So ask yourself, what kind of ”man-of-the-cloth” chooses to side with islamonazis and lies to people, worse yet, propagandizes to them for his own ideological purposes? He’s a fraud. I’ve talked with him, and confronted him after that lecture, concerning his lies, and ended up telling him he is behaving with a dhimmi-like mentality. What he responded with was not ”christian-like” in any sense of the word.

UK: COUSIN OF ROTHERHAM MUSLIM CHILD ABUSERS INSISTS PAKISTANI COMMUNITY HAS A PROBLEM, AVOIDS MENTIONING ISLAM……..

The so called ‘brave’ tell all cousin, Mohammed Shafiq, lies about Islam nonetheless, contrary to his blatherings, Islam does not treat all women better, it doesn’t even treat its own women with equality.

And so these men turn to outsiders, vulnerable Western girls, whom they regard as more easily available because of greater social freedom, seeing white girls as ‘easy’. But this exploitation ignores the fact that preying on white girls runs completely counter to the tenets of our Muslim faith, which requires believers to treat all women with respect.

Islam does not treat all women with respect, non-muslim women are free game to be taken as sex slaves:

Quran (4:24) and Quran (33:50) A man is permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage. Note that the verse distinguishes wives from captives (those whom they right hand possesses). TROP

My cousins the Rotherham child abusers and the Asian men who share their twisted view of white girls: A brave and very personal denunciation by a British Pakistani of those in his community who defend grooming gangs

British Pakistani denounces the Rotherham child abusers and their defenders

Mohammed Shafiq, inset left, has spent years fighting against the gangs within the Pakistani community in Britain who target and rape white women in towns such as Rotherham. Following the conviction of three of his cousins, Arshid Hussain, main picture left, and Arshid’s brothers Bashrat, inset top centre, and Bannaras, inset top right.

More here.

LYING RUSSIAN PM: WE CAN’T STOP MUSLIM MIGRANTS HEADING TO FINLAND, BUT WE’LL INSURE WON’T BE ‘EXCESSIVE’…..

This is ruse, a Russian ruse……

As I have reported before, the traffick of muslim settlers heading to Finland from Russia, is state sanctioned. The Kremlin skims cash from the mafia in exchange for allowing them to operate. There is no reason as to why Finns should allow any of these people to claim ”asylum”, simply turn them around and send them packing.

NOTE: During the height of the Cold War, Finns has a disgusting agreement with the Soviets, in that anyone seeking asylum from the communist state, had to be repatriated. And as far as I know, they did so without exception. Time to stop dancing to their tune and reject their pressure.

  • “Assisted by Russian officials” [He took along two Indian men and the Russian man, who got out about 100 kilometres from the border. At the Russian passport control on January 17, two African men also got into the car. They were being assisted by people whom the driver believed to be Russian officials]

Medvedev: Russia won’t send “excessive numbers” of asylum seekers to Finland

Ahead of a Friday evening meeting with Finnish President Niinistö, the Russian PM is quoted as saying that Moscow cannot stop asylum seekers from crossing into Finland.

Presidentti Sauli Niinistö ja Venäjän pääministeri Dmitri Medvedev.
President Sauli Niinistö and Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev Image: Antti Aimo-Koivisto / Lehtikuva ja Yekaterina Shtukina / AFP

Finnish President Sauli Niinistö meets with Russian Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev on Friday evening on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference. The two are likely to discuss the migrant situation along the countries’ mutual border, where the number of arriving asylum seekers has been surging in recent weeks.

Medvedev was earlier in the day quoted as saying that Russia does not intend to prevent asylum seekers’ movement toward the Finnish border.

The quote was posted on the Russian government website as part of its version of the premier’s interview with the German newspaper Handelsblatt – although the business daily’s published interview does not include any mention of Finland. In the official transcript, Medvedev says that Russia cannot stop asylum seekers from crossing into Finland.

“No legal grounds” to stop migrants

He is also quoted as saying that Niinistö and Finnish Prime Minister Juha Sipilä are very concerned about the situation, but that Russia does not have any legal grounds to stop those heading west into Finland. Medvedev met with Sipilä in St Petersburg in late January.

Medvedev notes that Russia is a party to the European Convention on Human Rights. He insisted that Russia has no bad intentions and does not plan to send excessive numbers of asylum seekers into Finland.

Finland’s 1340-kilometre border with Russia is the EU’s longest.

Yle

LEFTIST FEMALE ACADEMICS CLAIM SWEDISH WOMEN NOT THREATENED BY MUSLIM MIGRANTS ……

Of course, this is the same mindset (perhaps even same feminists?) who say they would rather be raped than be helped by ”the wrong types”.

swedish feminazis - dont help us if raped by immigrants

'Look closer at the facts on Swedish sex attacks'

Young women with foreign backgrounds in Stockholm in 2015. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

‘Look closer at the facts on Swedish sex attacks’

Published: 09 Feb 2016 07:49 GMT+01:00

Since the start of the year, Sweden has witnessed a storm of reports about sexual offences and other crimes against women and girls by men who are assumed by the media to be from the migrant community.
This followed the events in Cologne on New Year’s eve and claims of a police cover-up at a Stockholm music festival which emerged shortly afterwards.
The media has reported on a near daily basis about crimes against women and girls in the streets and in public baths, both in Sweden and elsewhere in Europe.
But when analysing these events, we need to begin by sorting out some statistical pitfalls. It would be refreshing for those engaged in this debate to observe the statistics, thus avoiding prejudice and stereotyping.

More here.

AL-JIZZ FAKE JOURNALIST PASSES OFF BIBLE TEXTS AS KORNIC, CAUGHT BY A SERIOUSLY EDITED TOMMY ROBINSON……

This is how to handle the lying, miserable and very tard orientated media.

Brian of London @ Israellycool caught the entire thing in a YT vid, here’s the story:

Can you criticise Islam or Mohammad in Qatar? No.

Tommy Robinson, one of the organisers of Pegida UK, appeared on Al Jazeera this evening in a panel discussion. But this 3 minute clip includes the part Al Jazeera cut out. You’ll see why when you hear it. And all that follows a pretty pathetic trick the presenter tries to pull by switching the Koran for the Hebrew bible!

Here’s more, from the same debate broadcast I captured and YT’d

FINLAND: LAST YEAR’S TESTING REVEALED 60% OF ASYLUM SEEKING MUSLIM ‘YOUTHS’ AS ADULTS…….

Like I said, we have the same problem with these frauds as others do elsewhere in Europe.

refugee youths in finland with beards

Age-test results: 60 per cent of underage asylum seekers revealed to be adults

Yle says in the news that an age-test took place in Finland last year for 149 minor asylum seekers, of which 90 were found to be adults. Age testing made an assessment of teeth and bones of the hand and wrist.

Official sources told Finnish news broadcast last week that age-proof was made ​​last year for about 300-400 minor asylum seekers.

Full beard and gray hair

According to the Finnish Immigration Service Asylum Unit Director, Esko Repo , the age of minors are investigated if there are obvious grounds for the applicant because of physical attributes. According to him, these criteria can be having a full beard and gray hair.

Repo told Suomen Uutiset, that the forensic aging testing typically has a two-year slide.

– For example, the answer may be “not less than 17 years old but not more than 19-year-old.” For such a result the applicant is placed with minors seeking asylum. However, if the result is “at least 19 years of age”, is that clear and the applicant is placed in the reception center for adults.

In borderline cases the case is decided in favor of the applicant.

Suomen Uutiset.fi

 

UK: MUSLIM ON CALLER REFUSES TO ANSWER TOMMY ROBINSON’S DIRECT QUESTION: CAN YOU CRITICIZE ISLAM……?

He completely tries to circumvent the question.

H/T: Brian of London

Tommy Robinson Goes Head-To-Head With Muslim Caller

Friday 5th February 2016

This is the moment that Tommy Robinson clashed with a Muslim caller live on LBC ahead of an anti-Islam march through Birmingham.

The former EDL leader, now an activist with Pegida, called LBC as we discussed the planned protest tomorrow, one of 14 taking place across Europe.

While he was on, Nick Ferrari also took a call from Balal, who was furious with Mr Robinson’s comments – and their row got very feisty.

LBC