Like I said, we have the same problem with these frauds as others do elsewhere in Europe.

refugee youths in finland with beards

Age-test results: 60 per cent of underage asylum seekers revealed to be adults

Yle says in the news that an age-test took place in Finland last year for 149 minor asylum seekers, of which 90 were found to be adults. Age testing made an assessment of teeth and bones of the hand and wrist.

Official sources told Finnish news broadcast last week that age-proof was made ​​last year for about 300-400 minor asylum seekers.

Full beard and gray hair

According to the Finnish Immigration Service Asylum Unit Director, Esko Repo , the age of minors are investigated if there are obvious grounds for the applicant because of physical attributes. According to him, these criteria can be having a full beard and gray hair.

Repo told Suomen Uutiset, that the forensic aging testing typically has a two-year slide.

– For example, the answer may be “not less than 17 years old but not more than 19-year-old.” For such a result the applicant is placed with minors seeking asylum. However, if the result is “at least 19 years of age”, is that clear and the applicant is placed in the reception center for adults.

In borderline cases the case is decided in favor of the applicant.




He completely tries to circumvent the question.

H/T: Brian of London

Tommy Robinson Goes Head-To-Head With Muslim Caller

Friday 5th February 2016

This is the moment that Tommy Robinson clashed with a Muslim caller live on LBC ahead of an anti-Islam march through Birmingham.

The former EDL leader, now an activist with Pegida, called LBC as we discussed the planned protest tomorrow, one of 14 taking place across Europe.

While he was on, Nick Ferrari also took a call from Balal, who was furious with Mr Robinson’s comments – and their row got very feisty.



Like I said earlier, we have the exact same problem here in Finland as well, just take a look at these supposed 14-17 year olds at a sporting event for ‘youths’ sponsored by a Finnish reception center for under age children.

refugee finland

Just how old do you think these migrant ‘children’ are? Alarming pictures of refugees – including ‘the fastest 14-year-old in Sweden’ – that shed light on a growing scandal amid Europe’s asylum crisis 

Migrant 'children' pictures that shed light on growing scandal amid asylum crisis

Examine the three ‘children’ in these pictures. One is of Ahmad Farid, who claimed he was 16 but appears at least 18 or more in the snap in which he is laughing as he’s given a fluffy toy polar bear at a refugee reception centre (top left). The second is of Saad Alsaud (main), reported to have been the fastest 14-year-old in Sweden, dwarfing schoolboys and girls as they join him for a run.

The other shows a Somalian named Youssaf Khaliif Nuur who claims he is 15 though he is 6ft tall and, according to one unconfirmed source, shaves his beard and moustache (bottom left). The word has spread across Europe about how easy it is to be accepted as a child migrant in Sweden. Now, the country has become overwhelmed with ‘unaccompanied minors’ in what critics suspect is a huge fraud.

More here.


It’s time to take a serious look at those (and marginalize them) who level the charges of “bigot and xenofauxbe”, than at their targets.

They champion the very type of people most likely to openly violate the morals and values they pretend to uphold and fight for. That’s the price they’re willing for society to pay in their pursuit of radically changing society to conform to their radical, utopian based ideology.

NOTE: It’s why they can on one hand, insist that they fight against Jew hatred (anti-semitism) and on the other, promote the full scale invasion of Jew hating muslims.

PC brigade ‘failing victims of sex abuse’: Minorities tsar slams liberals over Muslim criminals 

Louise Casey said some British officials were 'so wrapped up in political correctness' they ignored shameful scandals which led to vulnerable women and children being harmed across the country

Louise Casey said some British officials were ‘so wrapped up in political correctness’ they ignored shameful scandals which led to vulnerable women and children being harmed across the country

  • David Cameron’s integration tsar has blasted ‘hand-wringing’ liberals 
  • Says they fail to tackle forced marriage and abuses in Muslim communities
  • Louise Casey said some officials are ‘wrapped up in political correctness’
  • She’s carrying out review of how to boost integration for isolated groups

David Cameron’s integration tsar has blasted ‘hand-wringing’ liberals for failing to tackle forced marriage and other abuses in Muslim communities.

Louise Casey said some officials were ‘so wrapped up in political correctness’ they ignored shameful scandals which led to vulnerable women and children being harmed.

Miss Casey, who chaired the Government’s troubled families unit and led an investigation into social services in Rotherham – where Asian sex gangs had abused as many as 1,600 children – is carrying out a review of how to boost integration in the most isolated communities.

Commissioned by the Prime Minister, this is looking at how to help migrants learn English, as well as other ways of boosting women’s job prospects.

But Miss Casey claimed one issue was that the liberal elite had turned a blind eye to problems within some Muslim groups.

Read more:


This is all you need to know about ”Ali”:

Ali left his family behind in Samarra, and both he and Linnéa have followed news of Islamic State advances in the area over the last few months with concern. So why didn’t Ali bring his family with him to Europe? “Put them in a rubber boat on the open sea? At the mercy of the people smugglers? They are my children! I would never take that kind of risk,” Ali answers.

The point here is that he wasn’t ”fleeing to safety”, he could have taken his family to any number of refugee camps dotting the region. No, his whole mission was to GO TO EUROPE, not to rescue his family from a catastrophic situation or certain death. The fake journos at YLE couldn’t even figure that one out for themselves, that is if they were even curious.

The point being here is, that the Finnish people are paying a hefty sum for the ”free help” to service Linnéa Myttinen, the man in question shouldn’t be in the country at all. His only intention was to take advantage of the situation and join the throng who have always wanted to migrate to the European continent, then apply for his family to join him. These are not refugees, but economic tourists/colonizers.

Iraqi asylum seeker lends a hand: The story of Ali and Linnéa

Ali ja Linnéa keittössä kahvilla.

Linnéa Mynttinen is an 80-year-old Finnish pensioner who still actively participates in church and veteran events and attends functions for the hearing impaired. Ali Kamil al-Sammarnaie is a 36-year-old asylum seeker from Samarra, Iraq, a father of two who is trained as a statistician and IT engineer. When Linnéa contacted her local Evitskog asylum seeker reception centre to ask if someone there would be able to help her get around, Ali answered the call.

Linnéa bought a cake to celebrate on the day Ali heard he had been granted asylum in Finland.Image: Jyrki Ojala / Yle

“I needed a little help,” explains Linnéa Myttinen, a pensioner from the southern city of Kirkkonummi whose legs had become weak. Christmas was coming and she wasn’t sure she would be able to cope on her own. All autumn she had been moving around in a wheelchair, but leaving home had started to become a near impossible chore.

“I asked a taxi driver once if one of the asylum seekers could maybe help me out. I didn’t even know then if the centre housed men or women,” Linnéa remembers.

She contacted the centre, which quickly sent a young Iraqi man to her assistance. Linnéa said that she knew from the first moment she looked in Ali’s eyes that they would get along.

More here.

NOTE: No man leaves his family in danger while he chuckles it up in a foreign land, this is all pure fraud, and fraudulent YLE can’t even figure it out that they’re proving exactly that. What a bunch of losers.


She has nothing to say about the ideology of post-hijra Islam (the 2nd act of Mo) which makes any such move totally irrelevant to the health of any society.


She looks better in egg……

Muslim peer: Axe minarets to make new UK mosques look ‘quintessentially English’ so they ‘fit in’  

  • Tory chairman Baroness Warsi says many mosques in Britain are ‘ugly’
  • Says minarets are no longer needed as call to prayer is on loud speaker
  • Thinks that without minarets, mosques could look like village churches 

New mosques should be built without minarets to make them look ‘quintessentially English’ and fit in with the landscape, according to former Tory chairman Baroness Warsi.

Warsi, Britain’s first Muslim Cabinet Minister, is to launch a nationwide competition to design a new mosque as part of a campaign to boost religious tolerance.

She claimed many of those in Britain are ‘ugly’, and that if new ones were built without minarets they could even look like a traditional village church. She also said the aim of her idea was to develop an ‘authentic British Islamic brand’.

Baroness Warsi, Britain’s first Muslim Cabinet Minister, says new mosques should be built without minarets to make them look ‘quintessentially English’ and fit in with the landscape

Baroness Warsi, Britain’s first Muslim Cabinet Minister, says new mosques should be built without minarets to make them look ‘quintessentially English’ and fit in with the landscape

Baroness Warsi said historically, the function of the tower on mosques was to issue the call to prayer. Now the call is made by a loudspeaker, so Minarets (pictured on the Central London Mosque) are no longer necessary

Baroness Warsi said historically, the function of the tower on mosques was to issue the call to prayer. Now the call is made by a loudspeaker, so Minarets (pictured on the Central London Mosque) are no longer necessary

‘We need a debate about what British Islam will look like in ten years’ time,’ she told The Mail on Sunday.

‘There is a saying in Islamic thinking that Islam is like a river that takes the colour from the bed over which is flows, the bed being the country in which it is found. Here, the river of Islam flows over an English river bed and so it should reflect its colour.’

Historically, the function of the tower on mosques was to issue the call to prayer. Now the call is generally made with a loudspeaker.

More here.

Man and a minaret


War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

Only the fringe of society watches these shows, so I can’t say just how far reaching this lying turd bucket in a scarf’s words will resonate throughout the country. But it’s never a good thing when liars are not confronted over their deceptions, being given a platform to spew their propaganda.


Sharia advocate goes on the Daily Show to explain why Islamic oppression of women is, hey, really cool.

Robert Spencer

Dalia Mogahed, formerly Barack Obama’s adviser on Muslim affairs, appeared on Trevor Noah’s sinking-like-a-stone Daily Show last week, to explain to a worshipful Noah and an adoring audience that the hijab represented nothing more or less than the “privatization of women’s sexuality” – and who on earth but the most benighted lout could possibly be against that? The burning outrage of Mogahed’s words was probably missed by most Daily Show viewers. It should not be missed by FrontPage readers.

“The privatization of women’s sexuality.” A well-constructed and extraordinarily clever phrase, to be sure. With it, Mogahed suggests that the only people who could possibly object to women wearing hijabs are those who want to objectify women as sexual commodities. In this, we glimpse the subtle manipulation by which Islamic supremacists such as Mogahed have co-opted and silenced feminists whom one might otherwise have expected to have stood up against the Sharia oppression of women. How can one stand with the objectifiers, the pornographers, the users, the haters, against those who simply want to “privatize” their sexuality?

The audience loved this. Noah ate it up. But there are a few audiences before whom Mogahed’s extremely clever act might not play quite as well as it did before the Daily Show. Aqsa Parvez’s Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it. Aqsa might have a few choice words for Dalia Mogahed about “privatization” of her sexuality. And then there was Amina Muse Ali, who was a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab. Forty women were murdered in Iraq in 2007for not wearing the hijab. They might wish that their sexuality had been a trifle less “privatized” – at least enough for them to be able to continue to breathe air.

More here.



Cleric denies ties to San Bernardino killers as phone records surface

The cleric acting as spokesman for the San Bernardino mosque where terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook worshipped claims he barely knew Farook and didn’t know his terrorist wife at all. But phone records and other evidence uncovered by federal investigators cast doubt on his story.

The FBI has questioned the cleric, Roshan Zamir Abbassi, about his phone communications with Farook — including a flurry of at least 38 messages over a two-week span in June, coinciding with the deadly Muslim terrorist attack on two military sites in Chattanooga, Tenn.

Abbassi, a Pakistani, insists he had nothing to do with the shooting at a San Bernardino County government building five miles from the mosque. While he confirms the text messages with Farook, he claims they were merely discussing food donations for his Dar-al-Uloom al-Islamiya of America mosque.

More here.


From The Gates of Vienna:

That Maajid is telling Harris that the path forward for Islamic reform is to have new ‘interpretation’ (tafsir) of scripture should be very troubling to Harris. This kind of interpretation in Islam is only permitted to the learned scholars of Islam. It is not a democratic notion, with everyday Muslims reading scripture for themselves. Rather, Nawaz’s stated position on Islamic reform is basically “let’s leave it to the ulama to give us new tafsirs. That will result in a reformed Islam.” This indicates that he is not willing to really break with orthodoxy in Islam, and make Islam open to lay Muslims to read for themselves, in their own languages, the way that William Tyndale, who was burned at the stake for daring to translate the Bible into English, insisted on for his fellow Christians.

Maajid Nawaz: Stealth Jihadist Exposed

Maajid Nawaz is a prominent “moderate” or secular Muslim and the founder of the Quilliam Foundation in Britain. His organization was featured briefly in this space two years ago, when Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll left the EDL and teamed up with Quilliam just before Tommy’s trial (see these three posts from October 2013 for more on Tommy Robinson and Quilliam).

The following exposé by Vikram Chatterjee examines the extensive use by Maajid Nawaz of untruths, dissimulation, evasions, and misleading statements in his writings about Islam. In these he reveals himself to be a practitioner of taqiyya, tawriya, and kitman, the time-honored Islamic doctrines of lying and sacred misdirection.

Update: Mr. Chatterjee has cross-posted this article to his own blog, where you will find his further thoughts on Maajid Nawaz.

Maajid Nawaz: Stealth Jihadist Exposed
by Vikram K. Chatterjee

Thanks in part to the help of Douglas Murray, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Sam Harris, Prime Minister David Cameron and others, Maajid Nawaz has acquired an undeserved reputation as a secular liberal. Despite his outward facade of secularism and liberalism, Nawaz is in fact a deeply devout Sunni Muslim supremacist, operating far behind enemy lines in the Dar al-Harb, the House of War. Nawaz, to fulfill his duties as a Muslim, is waging a campaign of stealth Jihad in order to further the cause of Islam by making himself appear friendly and open to the Infidels of the West while simultaneously carrying out a campaign of mass deception about Islam itself. His goal is to weaken any resistance to the conquest of the Infidel lands of the West by publicly spreading disinformation about the faith, about its many ways of conquest, and deceiving his audience about the doctrinal details of Islam itself. While this may seem like a preposterous claim to make, it merely reflects the ordinary reality of stealth Jihad.

In what follows, Nawaz’s campaign of deception will be demonstrated.

Maajid Nawaz’s not-so-subtle threats of decapitation

The first thing to be said is that Nawaz is easily shown to have deployed threatening, jihad-tinged language after he supposedly became a secular liberal. In July of 2012, Nawaz’s bookRadical: My Journey Out of Islamist Extremism was published by WH Allen. The book purports to be a memoir in which Nawaz describes his youth in Essex, how he joined the Sunni supremacist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, and how he became a political prisoner in Egypt where he supposedly had a revelation in which he saw that “Islamism”, or variously “Islamist extremism” was a divisive political ideology, and decided to leave it (but not, crucially, Islam itself), becoming a secular liberal. Fifteen months later, in October 2013, a year and a half after the UK publication of Nawaz’ memoir, Tommy Robinson quit the English Defense League, the organization which he started, out of fear that its ranks were swelling with neo-Nazis. He embraced Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam Foundation instead, accepting at the time their claims of secularism to be genuine. In an email obtained by Huffington Post Assistant News Editor Jessica Elgot, Nawaz described this event as the “UK’s largest right-wing street movement — the EDL — is being decapitated.”[1] (emphasis added)

Interesting choice of words, no? Why would the “former Islamist extremist” Maajid Nawaz use such threatening, jihad-tinged language? Could his secular liberalism be a clever sham? As we shall see, turning to the book he co-authored with Sam Harris, the evidence shows Nawaz is cold and calculating in his bald-faced telling of untruths, repeatedly deploying outrageous falsehoods about Islam.

The lies of Maajid Nawaz in Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue

Published in October 2015, Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue purports to be a conversation between two liberals, one an acknowledged atheist and secularist, the other a supposedly nominal Muslim. The goal of the book seems to be to find a way of talking about Islam and its attendant problems in a polite way, and search for a path for a kind of Islamic secularism. Harris, apparently convinced of Nawaz’ liberalism and secularism, entered into the “dialogue” with him in October 2014. In an article entitled “Can Liberalism Be Saved From Itself”, Harris wrote what will prove to have been a fateful sentence:

Whatever the prospects are for moving Islam out of the Middle Ages, hope lies not with obscurantists like Reza Aslan but with reformers like Maajid Nawaz.[2]

Harris called Aslan an obscurantist, yet turning to his book with Nawaz, on page 44 we find Nawaz saying, of Sayyid Qutb, the notorious Muslim Brotherhood leader, theologian and author of Milestones, and In The Shade of the Qur’an, whose zealous career was a primary force in creating the modern Islamic movements to restore the Caliphate, that “the Egyptian regime killed him for writing a book”.

This is a straightforward falsehood. Notoriously, Qutb was executed by the Egyptian state for his alleged involvement in an attempt to assassinate Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser.[3] By saying that Qutb was executed for merely writing a book, Nawaz portrays Qutb as a devout Muslim as an innocent victim, a tried and true tactic of Islamic propaganda. It seems highly unlikely that Nawaz is unaware of the real reason for Qutb’s execution, given that Nawaz spent four years at the same prison in which Qutb was held, Mazra Tora.

Moving on, on page 61 of the book, Harris brings up the important point of Qur’anic literalism:

I want to ask you about this, because my understanding is that basically all “moderate” Muslims — that is, those who aren’t remotely like Islamists, or even especially conservative, in their social attitudes — are nevertheless fundamentalists by the Christian standard, because they believe the Qur’an to be the literal and inerrant word of God.

Excellent question, Sam. Do mainstream Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the literal and inerrant word of God? What is Nawaz’s reply?

Well, Nawaz’s three-page reply on pages 61-64 gives no answer whatsoever to this question. He avoids it entirely, beginning with the evasive phrase “I think we have to be careful to avoid two mistakes…” and so on. Nawaz then goes on a curious series of tangents, offering up entertaining thoughts about the meaning of the term literal, which is apparently a big mystery. He then turns down a series of historical side tracks about the Mu’tazilites, Iranian philosophy, and the Council of Nicaea before telling us, in answer to the question of whether the Qur’an was created by God that he “won’t take theological stances here”.

Having done all that, on page 64 Nawaz drops the arresting phrase “because there is no clergy in Islam”, apparently confident that Harris and the reader have never heard of the ulama. Nawaz finishes by stating that “My role is to probe and ask skeptical questions about interpretive methodology, Muslim history, identity, politics, policy, values, and morality”, a job description that apparently does not include answering straightforward questions like “Do Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the literal and inerrant word of God?” The reader ends up finding no definitive answer to this salient question, which is curious, since Nawaz is supposedly an honest secularist and liberal who should be eager to answer simple questions. That Harris cannot bring himself to press Nawaz on this important point, or catch Nawaz’s lie about there being “no clergy in Islam” demonstrates his inadequacy to the task at hand.

More here.


So islam is not related to terrorism, but if you speak out against islam it will create terrorism. Got it.

“The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create”.


Who cares what a little upstart marxist has to say anyways? It’s one of the reasons why I never jumped on the ”Malala bandwagon”. That she’s running defense for Islam only underlines my common sense decision to consider her irrelevant on any given subject.

Malala Yousafzai urges people not to blame Muslims for terrorism as it ENCOURAGES ISIS

THE teenage Nobel prize-winner Malala Yousafzai has urged people not to blame all Muslims for terrorism as it just helps terrorists recruit more jihadis.


 recent comments to ban all MuslimsGETTY

The inspiring young superstar even criticised Donald Trump’s recent comments to ban all Muslims

The inspiring young superstar even criticised Donald Trump’s recent comments to ban all Muslim immigration from the US.

She said the controversial United States presidential hopeful “could radicalise more terrorists” as the 18-year-old Pakistani campaigner urged politicians to think carefully before speaking.

She said that the rise in Islamophobia seen since the Paris terror attacks and San Bernandino shooting in California would only make matters worse.The education activist added: “I can just highlight one thing.

“The more you speak about Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists we create.

“If your intention is to stop terrorism, do not try to blame the whole population of Muslims for it because it cannot stop terrorism.”

More here.



The Shiites who have a long bloody history with the Sunnis know all is not what it appears to be.

The rest of us on the outside do not trust either of them, and most would wish the whole subject would be quashed entirely. The Saudis are finding this and all parties concerned, inside and outside know for a fact that they’ll have strings attached, and from our point of view, it matters little which side is pushing an Islamic agenda, western society suffers as a result.

NOTE: It’s been said that: “The more Islam you have, the less freedom you have”. That truism is factual long before it was first uttered. Anas Hajjar is a lying piece of you know what.

Anas Hajjar imaami IMG_2015_00426334

The mosque is open to all


Helsingin sanomat newspaper


We are ready to cooperate with all Islamic communities and Resalat (TT:Shiite) is no exception to this rule.

We have clearly shown to all that this is to be a Sunni Mosque, which is open to everyone. The religious policy of the Central Mosque will be a moderate Islamic one. The aim is to promote peace and dialogue

The entirety will be administered by a Finnish foundation. The administration will also have non-Muslims.

Donors are motivated by charity which according to Islam is historical. Funding sources are going to continue to communicate openly, and we are ready to take the funding received from all who do not set the terms of issue of money.

Anas Hajjar
Finnish Islamic Council (Sine)
Pia Jardi
project leader
Multifunctional Centre and Mosque project


NOTE II: Rest assured that if this monstrosity is allowed to be built, it will be a fully Saudi Islamic supremacist run operation, and anyone not in line with their project will get the boot. It’s nothing more than a big dawa project to convert Finns to Islam and push Saudi agendas.


Trying to make us buy into this crap is their life’s mission.

obama mosque

An Islam of Their Very Own . . . Cont’d


The day after the San Bernardino jihadist attack that left fourteen dead and even more wounded, my old boss, Rudy Giuliani, came out and said what most sane people are thinking. After hours of pained, halting, incoherent babbling by public officials from President Obama on down about whether the mass-killing by two heavily armed, obviously well-trained Muslims constituted a terrorist attack, Rudy exploded:

You can come to one clear conclusion with the information they have right now. This is an act of terror. The question was motivation. . . . The question here is not, is it an act of terror. We’re beyond that. When you got two assault weapons, two handguns, you’re in body armor, you got a home that’s booby-trapped. You’ve [ACM: meaning “they’ve”] been practicing to do this. . . . If you can’t come to a conclusion at this point that this was an act of terror, you should find something else to do for a living besides law enforcement. I mean, you’re a moron.

Hard to argue with that.

But look, if you actually speak with the police and federal agents conducting the investigation into the attack, you figure out pretty quickly that they are not morons. They are actually very good at what they do. So why is it that, upon seeing two-plus-two, they can’t call it four when Islam is involved?

I’ve been trying to explain this for many years, beginning in Willful Blindness, a memoir about prosecuting terrorists in the Clinton era, and in a stack of columns here at National Review, including one from a few years back that described how our government, under administrations of both parties and the bipartisan Beltway ruling class, has constructed “an Islam of their very own.”

Rudy is right that what they’ve done is moronic, but there is a logic to it. It goes like this.

The government denies that terrorism is caused by Islamic doctrine. This is a triumph of willful blindness and political correctness best illustrated by former British home secretary Jacqui Smith, who might as well have been speaking for our government when she branded terrorism as “anti-Islamic activity.” That is: the savagery is not merely unrelated to Islam but becomes, by dint of its being violence, contrary to Islam. This must be so because the British government, like our government, insists Islam is a “religion of peace.”

Read more at:


Islam 101 = post-hijra islam

syed farook with koran

He went to the mosque and read the same koran, memorized it, studied the same hadiths and came away convinced shedding infidel blood would be pleasing to allah. Therein lies the problem, the post-hijra muslims are right and there is nothing that the four schools of islamic orthodoxy can do (nor would they) to steer them from this path, outside impressing upon them not to do this or that due to their own short-long term goals in the political realm. This is camel in the room.

Also, the mosque’s imam states the following standard apologetic flim-flam which totally discredits him and underlines my point, that they are entirely uninterested in ”combating violent Islamic impulses”, because they can’t, doing so would be anti-islam.

At the Islamic Center of Riverside, where Farook had worshipped until about two years ago, mosque director Mustapha Kuko described him as quiet, private and devoted to Koran study. “He knows that we believe that to take one life is to take all life. So for him to do the opposite of what we as Muslims believe … I don’t know,” Kuko said.

 This verse being invoked was addressed to/for the Jews……….
“Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”

Here it is for the Muslims…………..
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,

It’s obvious that the imam knows this, better than I, yet…..the lies and obfuscations.

Rampage killers led secret life, hiding plans and weapons

Laura J. Nelson, Soumya Karlamangla and Paloma EsquivelContact Reporters

Early Wednesday morning, Syed Rizwan Farook asked his mother for the sort of favor grandmothers love to grant: A few hours of baby-sitting. Farook told her that he and his wife, Tashfeen, had a doctor’s appointment and didn’t want to take their 6-month-old daughter.

In an account of the conversation provided by a relative through a local Islamic leader, the grandmother agreed. She was caring for the child at the couple’s Redlands home when news of a mass shooting in nearby San Bernardino broke.

Fearing her son and daughter-in-law were victims, “she started calling. No answer,” said Hussam Ayloush, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Los Angeles office. It was only after reporters started phoning her that she realized the couple were the assailants.

More here.


Andy Bostom is the go-to man on understanding the Islamic doctrine of jihad.

I understand his (Mohammed Chirani’s) need to dissemble, but it’s pure fantasy and needs to be debunked at every turn.

lying dawa artist france mohamed chirani

French Muslim Mohammed Chirani stares down Islamic State to declare jihad

A French Muslim who created headlines when he went on national television in France to declare jihad on Islamic State (IS) extremists says he is not deterred by the death threats he has received since.

In the wake of the Paris attacks, Mohammed Chirani, a specialist in religious radicalisation, delivered an impassioned speech telling IS that Allah would not protect them.

“Know that our dead, the innocent French citizens, are in paradise,” he said.

“And your dead, the terrorists, are in hell.”

Holding up a copy of the Koran and his French passport, he said he would use both to wage jihad against the extremists.

“I’d like to say we’ll wage jihad against you with the Koran,” he said.

“I’d like to tell the traitors who deceived France, betrayed their country and burned their IDs, that we are kissing our documents.”

More here. H/T: 



The “genocide hugger” wants to return to the States because he misses the good ol’ US of A.

‘Clock Boy’ Ahmed Homesick in Qatar, Wants to Come Back to Texas

Within days of demanding a total of $15 million from the City of Irving and the Irving Independent School District, “Clock Boy” Ahmed Mohamed announced in a long distance phone interview from Qatar, he is homesick and wants to come home to Texas now.

In October, Ahmed accepted a fully-funded education scholarship from the Qatar Foundation, an organization with reputed ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, over an invitation to MIT, which is among the most prestigious institutions of higher learning in the world. The family announced they would relocate to Qatar to accommodate his education, which they did.

Dallas’ KTVT 11 (CBS) interviewed the teen from halfway around the world over Facetime. Now, Ahmed claims he misses Texas. “I want to go back to a place where everyone knows me,” meaning the kids he grew up with. He also hinted a trip to Dallas may be in the works over the Christmas holiday. He told the CBS affiliate he is ready to come home and wants to do so immediately, but insists last week’s armed yet peaceful protest outside the Irving mosque stopped him.

More here.


Tell that to the hundreds of millions that felt its blade and rape sessions.

scene from a muslim slave market of white women2 otto pilny

British Muslim verbally abused on a train thanks the commuters who rushed to her aid and says her religion wouldn’t even condone ‘killing an ant’

Ruhi Rehamn, 23, was racially abused by a stranger who accused her of carrying a bomb on the Newcastle Metro. She appeared on Good Morning Britain to thank fellow commuters.

More here.

NOTE: Or the men on their way down to become a splat for being accused of homosexuality.

homosexuals and islam


Drop kick this islamo-pedaling sharia merchant out of the country. 

sheik bin bayyah kicked out

Shame on the Finnish government, the Finnish Lutheran Church, former president Martti Ahtirsaari’s CMI and the rest, for bringing this sharia spreading liar and Islamic supremacist to Finland.

This guy is riding on an Islamic high, Muslim infiltration into Europe is going on at breakneck speed, he doesn’t have to support violent jihad when hijra jihad is proceeding along unrestricted.

The goal of jihad is to instil the sharia, how they manage it is only an operational question, through violence or by over islamization, why blow people up when they are getting pretty much everything that they want?

NOTE: The man sitting next to him at the table, the Finn, is Pekka Haavisto, the well know (in Finland) openly homosexial politician.

Islam, top expert: Violence can not be justified by religion

Foreign Minister's Special Representative Pekka Haavisto, the world's leading Islamic scholar Shaykh Abdullah bin Mahfudh ibn Bayyah and outdoor destination, assistance for peace network of expert Mohamed Elsanousi a press conference in National Dialogues conference on Monday.
Foreign Minister’s Special Representative Pekka Haavisto, the world’s leading Islamic scholar Shaykh Abdullah bin Mahfudh ibn Bayyah and outdoor destination, assistance for peace network of expert Mohamed Elsanousi a press conference in National Dialogues conference on Monday.

People doing terrorist attacks  are criminals and do not represent Islam, said the world’s leading expert in the faith’s doctrine and in Islamic law, Shaykh Abdullah bin Mahfudh ibn Bayyah, said in Helsinki on Monday.

“It is therefore you shouldn’t talk about Islamic violence, but the people who tend to falsely and justify the deeds in the name of religion.”

Bin Bayaah talked at the National Dialogues conference in the opening of the House of Estates in Helsinki. He took a strong stand in his speech on the series of terrorist attacks taking place on Friday in Paris.

“When someone uses religion to explain the act of violence, religion is one of the victims. We need to spend a lot of time articulation of religion and to explain in a way that supports humanity and peace, “he said.

Bin Bayyah will chair the Forum, which promotes peace in Islamic communities and is one of the most potent anti-violent extremism speakers from the Islamic world.

He came to the conference Finn Church Aid Peace Network was invited.

Imams may be messengers of peace

Bin Bayaahin according to the Islamic community has sought to act against terrorism in many ways very recently.

“We educate religious leaders and ordinary people, so that they understand the possibility of peaceful co-existence between religions. We train imams, to enable them to be messengers of peace. “

“We do not have armies, but we have the power of our words,” he stressed.
Bin Bayyahin that it is particularly important to share the peaceful message of Islam, as well as the media and through, especially social media. This is capable of affecting also the fact that the attractive violence message gets domination in poor and remote areas.

“I appeal to all governments to join this cultural dialogue. The only way to promote peace and peaceful coexistence, “Bin Bayyah said.

Participating in the dialogue to be a real opportunity to influence

That’s what Paris and elsewhere is happening now, says the moderate Islamism contributed to the failure so far, said postdoctoral researcher Thania Paffenholz in his speech.

“But it does not mean that we should give up.”

“For example, women may have answers that men do not have,” he said.
Paffenholz stressed dialogue and participation in quality bringing peace to the different areas of conflict.

“The sheer number of participants is not sufficient to guarantee the quality. It is easy to take a huge amount of participants. Then conducted a long and complex debate and, finally, the same small group of old men make the decisions. “

This, he says, for example, fed the frustration of peace efforts in Yemen.

The world’s leading peace and reconciliation work of the experts continue to discuss National Dialogues -konferessissa until Wednesday evening.

The conference organized by the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Arrangements shall also accompanied by four NGOs: Finn Church Aid, Crisis Management Initiative, Finnish Evangelical Lutheran Mission, and the Common Space Initiative. NGO cooperation coordinated by Finn Church Aid.

NOTE: “Following the recent terrorist attacks in Paris, millions of people are once again trying to understand the relationship between Islam and terrorism. Both peaceful Muslims and jihadists quote the Quran to justify their views. In this video, David Wood examines two verses of the Quran to determine the Quranic stance on terror.”