With talk of a ”mega mosque (beachhead) in Finland, we need all hands on deck to mount a media offensive against it as well.



How To Stop A Mosque

I will try and use this method myself in Copenhagen. I will let you know via our 10News newsletter how it goes.

Feel very welcome to translate and try yourself:

How To Stop A Mosque
By: Nicolai Sennels

First I want to stress that stopping mosques is absolutely possible. Gavin Boby’s organization Law And Freedom Foundation has managed to stop 20 out of 24 mosque projects in the UK – and counting (Law and Freedom Foundation). The below recipies is inspired by Boby:

The problems with mosques are that:

1) They spread fundamentalist, unmoderated Islam by not publicly and actively rejecting the Quran’s and Muhammad’s criminal incitement to violence and murder. Instead they preach the Quran (Allah’s revelations to Muhammad) and the Hadiths (Muhammad’s own deeds and sayings which are equally holy to Muslims) as faultless, even though they include hundreds of verses urging and even ordering Muslims to persecute, forcibly convert, rob, rape, harm,maim, enslave and kill non-Muslims, apostates and hypocrites (Muslims not fully subjugating to Islamic law, Sharia) and suppress, beat and rape their own Muslim women.

2) By spreading Islam, mosques spread Islam’s oppressive rules and regulations among Muslims and leads to radicalization. This does not only include Islam’s obligation to wage war, so-called Jihad, on non-Muslims on every level, including economical, cultural and physical. This also includes the many rules and regulations in the Sharia that revoke Muslims’ basic human rights to choose their own partner (e.g. a non-Muslim partner), women’s right to freely divorce (e.g. divorcing a violent partner), religion, clothing and life style. By strengthening the religious tenants of Islam in the Muslim society, Mosques contribute to the well-known social control among Muslims, which tend to radicalize vulnerable youths and put pressure on moderate, secular Muslims.

3) Mosque buildings, especially the dominating minarets, are not fitting into Western architecture and by allowing them in our cities and towns we Islamize the architectural landscape of our countries. All types of islamization, including changing our townscapes to accommodate to fundamentalists’ dream of building Arab style mosques and “cultural centers” in Western cities, is reshaping our society to make it easier for Islamic fundamentalists who prefer Islam to Western culture and values, to come and live among us. We do not need more of that, we need less. Every time we give into Muslims’ demands for special treatment and allow our countries to be Islamized, however little, our own culture is being pushed aside to some degree. None of this is counter-productive in the struggle against fundamentalist Islam and it is an affront to Western society and culture.

More here.

NOTE: Former Muslim and sharia scholar, Sam Solomon on mosques, what they really are about.

Comparison of Non-Islamic vs Islamic views of one’s freedom of choice and options in life.

So we see that a mosque is a seat of government. A mosque is a school. A mosque is a court. A mosque is a training center. A mosque is a gathering place, or social center. It is not a place of “worship” per se as understood and as practiced in Western societies.

Specifically, how is a mosque a threat to the community within which it is built?

Every single mosque in the world, by definition, is modeled on the mosque of Muhammad in Medina in accordance with the Sunnah. The Sunnah interprets the Qur’an by reporting exhaustively on everything that Muhammad said, did, or consented to. Therefore, his Medina mosque, the first mosque, was a place where he gave judgments, where he decided who would be executed, where he instituted policy—domestic and military— where Jihad war strategies were designed. Consequently, it was a storage place for arms, a military training base, and was where troops were blessed and dispatched. Literally they were sent to conquer – first the whole of Arabia, and then the rest of the known world. Therefore if the present-day mosque is modeled as per the Sunnah of Muhammad then there should be very serious concern. As is well-known, Muslims are required to follow the example (Sunnah) of Muhammad—and according to Sura 33:36 it is not an option or a matter of opinion: “It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.”  This explains and establishes beyond doubt why arms have been found in mosques in various countries, and in different capital cities.

In addition to the undisputed significance of the Medina mosque as the role model for all Mosques, there is also the Islamic policy of establishing strategic Mosques as beachheads with interconnected networks. Taken together, these two policies do constitute a clear and present danger—and a need for concern.

For example, when Abu Hamza[1] was the Imam of the Finsbury Park mosque in the United Kingdom, he trained people, he sent out terrorists  and British authorities found arms stored there.  He was well within his Islamic mandate as these activities were sanctioned by Islam. He didn’t find it wrong because it is in the Islamic manuals. Another prime example of a mosque being found to have engaged in high-level political, military and intelligence activities is the Munich Mosque, which is now considered by Islamists to be on a par with some  of highest-ranked Mosques in Muslim countries.[2]



The more people are made aware of Boby’s successes in the UK, and that they have actual redress in getting zoning commissions to reject mosque/community centers applications for building permits, the better.

NOTE: Please contact me in the comments to ask in private email on how to upload my sidebar ‘LTN’ logo, in order to place it on your sidebar as well.



H/T of course: The Vladmeister:

This is the first part of Gavin’s speech. The file sizes are large and it takes a long time to export the video due to the plug-ins I used to try and compensate for the attrocious lighting at the Ottawa Public Library. I would like to thank my friend very much who filmed it however, and his crew and I will try and edit the rest and have it uploaded within the next 48 hours.



First the news report from the CBC.

NOTE: Blogwrath has a complete rundown on the speaking events. I met Gavin Boby in Brussels last year, and found him to be very much up to the task at hand. He loves a challenge, and the more they push against him, the more he enjoys the legal fight.

Here is the interview from Sun News



The Law and Freedom Foundation has an amazing success record in stopping mosques, planned for construction, that upsets the natural order of the area designated for their construction, from ever being built. Gavin Boby himself, is an amazing man as well, and the people of Britain are extremely fortunate to have him as one of their own. From a recent info email:

How We Win

by Gavin Boby

Gavin_BobyWe’ve won 16 out of 17 mosque cases that we’ve fought — a 94.11% success rate. That could be beginner’s luck, right? Maybe we just keep stumbling on four-leafed clovers. So I thought I’d drill down into one of our recent wins where the evidence is online. Please see the Brent case, here, our last win but one. Our brief write up is here.

We hit the ground with this application on 20th October 2012. Please see the Council’s comments page, here: 298 comments in total, and all but 10 of them were objections. Pretty strongly worded, too.

You’ll see that this application was registered on 14th September, and had only got 2 comments by 20th October, when we got involved. But the reaction was immediate. See the objections from 20th October onwards. This is how we won.

When the refusal notice came through, the refusal reasons (see here) were very similar to the objections we suggested local people might like to use in their letters (see here).

The reason I’m going on about this is to show that:

  • You have to get ordinary local people to register their objections with the Council;
  • Ordinary people don’t want a mosque near them, and are keen to register their objections if they know (a) how and where, (b) that it isn’t a stitch-up, and (c) the they can win;
  • If you help people in this way, Councils have to take notice, and you will win.
  • Other than that, let Councils know that they’re on the hook for their decisions. Be relentless. Push.



Stupid is, is stupid does.

Looks like the U.S. badly needs the UK’s expert lawyer on the issue of mosque building, Gavin Boby, from the LAW & FREEDOM FOUNDATION.

It’s either Mosque Busting Gavin Boby, or Ramadamdingdongdoo:

The Islamic Center of Murfreesboro sued Rutherford County earlier in the day and asked District Judge Todd Campbell for an emergency order to let worshippers into the building before the holy month of Ramadan starts at sundown Thursday.

Federal prosecutors also filed a similar lawsuit.

The future of the mosque had been in question since May, when a local judge overturned the county’s approval of the mosque construction. This month he ordered the county not to issue an occupancy permit for the 12,000-square-foot building.

More here.



Let this serve as a warning to everyone in the UK who spots a mosque being planned in their neighborhood. You either pick up the phone and dial the man, Gavin Boby,  and ask for his assistance, or do as the town of Derby did, don’t call him and then open your windows and wait to hear the call of the muezzin. It’s that simple.

The City of Derby is a classic example. They were recently the fortunate recipients of an application for “A MOSQUE that could cater for 600 people, with a minaret towering 21 metres into the sky, will be built in Derby”. See the image above.

The good people of Derby didn’t approach us for help.

The mosque got planning permission on March 15th.

And this in spite of the Council Planning Officer recommending that permission be refused because of “physical dominance”, “overbearing height”, “mass within the plot” and “undue harm to the amenities of adjacent and nearby residents”.

The Councillors evidently believed that no mosque could possibly be intended to dominate its area and, therefore, granted planning permission. The Chairman went so far as to describe the mosque as “an addition to some of the finest architecture in Derby“.

The campaign against this mosque was heartfelt, but ineffectual.

There were 17 objection letters, and 63 letters in support. The Councillors went with the numbers.

As usual, this application teaches us the following:

  • Councillors know better than anyone the division and harm that Islam creates, and is creating. They are in a position to see it every day. They will have understood why there were 17 objection letters and a petition of 106 signatures against the proposal.
  •      Councillors, like most other ruling elitists, don’t care about the harm to the community. Their concern is with their career, which nothing must interrupt. Unfortunately, this all too frequently means “allowance”. They don’t get paid – but it isn’t only MP’s who like expense accounts, and if you are ever approached to become a Councillor, one of the first things you will be told about is your expense allowance, which averages out at about £12,000-13,000 per Councillor, and rising fast. See this table for 2008, from the BBC.
  •      Councillors can be relied on to go with whoever creates the most fuss. So far, this has been muslim populations who, as we all know, can get quite irrational if they feel their religion is thwarted.
  •      Councillors’ resulting aim is to see out their tenure in peace, and pray that the collapse comes afterwards. No Councillor seriously thinks the Derby mosque will be some of the finest architecture in Britain, or that architecture is the only or even the main aim. They know the harm it will bring, and they’re betting on enjoying a few more fat years before the chickens come home to roost.

Politicians of every stripe know the sound of the people waking up, and fear it coming sooner than they calculated. They fear muslim irrationality, but they dread far more the judgment of their English peers, whom they have been busy ignoring for so long.

Councillors’ cowardice and opportunism – the reason why mosque planning application so often succeed – are also the reason why a well run opposition campaign is successful.

But you need to run it well and make it count. So call us.

In the meantime, I wish the City of Derby well. I hope they enjoy their mosque, because they will have at least a decade in which to do so. Before the tide turns far enough to reach them.

Source/Lawman @ Mosquebusters



Over at The Blaze, The Lawman states the following:

Hello, this is The Lawman, of the Law and Freedom Foundation, the guy mentioned in this article.

Thank you very much for all your kind comments and support, which are much appreciated!

I think it is a very good and exciting idea to start up a US branch. The first step is to get our English section fully effective. We’ve not long started, but so far the signs are good: we have won each of the ten cases we have fought to date. Our 100% success rate may not be permanent, but there’s all to fight for.

In reply to your comments, we mainly need funding – sorry but it’s true. Plus a few reliable, salt-of-the-earth volunteers who can devote an hour or two each week, rain or shine. Please visit our website for the email.

The approach is transferrable. I think it can transfer to America because your politicians, whilst less dire than ours, still appear to have a healthy dose of cowardice and opportunism. You can succeed.

We will prevail. That is not the issue. The issue is what harm our leaders will cause in order to push their PC gravy train a bit further. And this is why it is essential for us to take lawful but firm action early.

Keep going, and kind regards!

The Lawman



Thanks to the Blaze for highlighting the Mosque Busters story.


UPDATE: Vlad adds: Before I copy paste some of the article and the link to this story, please know that this idea was Gavin’s alone, and that he has done all this work to stop over 10 mosques from being built or expanded and done it all with his own money and sweat. If you are able to kick him even $5.00 or $10.00 please consider doing it as he is out of pocket a lot, and what he is doing is risking  his entire career and as importantly, is an effective way of slowing or stopping Saudi radical influence in the Western world within a legal framework and doesn’t require burning or stoning anything.



Foreign Policy magazine, owned by the Washington Post, is well known for carrying water for the anti-conservative/ anti-Israel crowd, they’re a leftist organization. Period. It’s great however, that they’ve published a link and the front page of the Tundra Tabloids in a story on the lawyer behind Mosque Busters, Gavin Boby. Great opportunity to shine a little light in their direction. Boby should be pleased with the extra publicity for his organization, as I am. Thanks for the new traffic FP.

NOTE: For more on Mosque Busters, click here and here.




  • BOLTON. Application reference 87089/11: planning application to turn a shop (a former pub) into a mosque. Refused on traffic and parking grounds.
  • EALING. Application reference: 2011/4564: Planning application to turn the sheds to the rear of 387 & 389 Uxbridge Road into a mosque. Refused. No reason published online yet.
  • KIRKLEES. Application reference: 2011/92581. Planning application to turn the beautiful old Jolly Sailor Pub into a mosque. Application withdrawn.
  • LUTON. Council decision not to sell development land on the cheap to the Masjid E-Ali mosque outfit – see previous post.

Winning means either we get a refusal or the other side withdraw the application.

They could come back again, and if they do we’ll fight them again. But we’ve seen ‘em off this time.

There’s all to play for.

It can be done.


H/T: The Vladmeister

If you oppose a mosque planning application you will win.

You’ve got to do it with confidence; you’ve got to laugh at the Council and muslims’ nonsense about islamophobia; and you’ve got to keep the pressure up.

If you do, you will win.

That is the lesson from Blackpool, 28th November 2011, when the Planning Committee were forced to refuse permission for the Noor a-Madina mosque.

And they refused it unanimously. The facts, strength of local opinion, and the professional help from Gavin Boby of the Law and Freedom Foundation, gave them no choice.

The Law and Freedom Foundation tried to film proceedings, but a burly guard stuck his gut in front of the camera and ordered it off. Filming committee meetings is quite legal, and encouraged by the government.

Here’s a still of his belly, with Councillors behind and Gavin Boby to the left:

 Councils are opportunists. They love the PC gravy train, and like to pass mosque planning applications on the quiet, like a vicar passing gas at high tea.

The front-lady for the mosque is Mrs. Tasurraf Shah. We are not sure that she is so nice a person as she looks:

Their organ-grinder is the decidedly less inclusive Qari Muhammad Zaman Qadri.

Ms. Shah claims on her website:


“I am a member of the Race equality and planning committee @ the Town Hall. Im am a qualified Interpreter and would also want to give law facillity for Immagration here on the FYLDE.I am a mother of 7…”

Perhaps this is has something to do with the history of this case:

Continue Reading



Yet another Slam dunk!

From the Vladinator: I will have news and details hopefully soon. But I couldn’t wait to break the excellent news that Gavin at Law and Freedom Foundation has scored another massive home run stopping a mosque in the very town where Muslims murdered and then chopped up and sold the body of a young British girl they had already sexually exploited as kabobs to unwitting customers. Blackpool.

I hope to have much more on this soon but 3 cheers for Gavin Boby and please everyone, visit his site and support him. He is doing fantastic work.

(Any errors or omissions in this post is my error and mine alone and due to premature posting syndrome)



Just wait until the muezzin starts to wail around the clock.

Please do notice all the good touchy feely emotions coming from all sides. Just wait until the proselytizing starts, and numbers rise and floods of Muslims start coming in, then the same idiots who approved of the ground breaking will have their names used as curse words.

Everything now is all “kumbaya”, just wait until the future comes crashing down on their heads, then it’s too late. Don’t come crying to the rest of us who warned about that eventuality before you signed the deeds. Just saying. KGS

NOTE: They should have called Mosque Busters.

H/T: Scottish Infidel

Murfreesboro mosque members celebrate groundbreaking

MURFREESBORO — After 29 years of meeting in homes, apartments and offices, the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro on Wednesday celebrated breaking ground for its future mosque on Veals Road.

“It shows the greatness of America,” said Essam Fathy, a founding member of the ICM in 1982. “Anything is possible in the United States. We are all enjoying the freedoms the Constitution offers.”

An estimated 250 to 300 people attended the ICM’s groundbreaking ceremony at its 15-acre site, just southeast of Murfreesboro’s city limits.

“We welcome everyone,” Imam Ossama Bahloul, the ICM’s religious leader, told supporters gathered for the event. “Let us all pray to God. May God help all of us to have peace in our heart toward others.”

The ICM has faced fierce opposition since early 2010 when a vandal spray-painted “Not Welcome” on the congregation’s Veals Road sign announcing the future home.

More here.



Over at Mosque Busters, they’re slam-dunking them one after the other! KGS

From Law and Freedom: Round one to us in Uxbridge!

Posted on September 13, 2011 by Eeyore

In June 2011, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association lodged a confident planning application for a – you guessed it! – “community centre” in Uxbridge.

But there is already a community centre next door! We all know how Islam has always bent over backwards to promote wellbeing in the country it inflicts itself upon (whoops! I mean “enriches with its presence”!), but building a new community centre smack next door to an existing one is too much even by their standards. Surely the mosque outfit are not being coy about a mosque proposal?!

Given their confident tone, imagine our surprise when this application was pulled a week ago, and an appeal lodged for “non-determination”. The mosque outfit didn’t want to wait for the Council decision. Fancy that!

Could this have anything to do with the number of objections coming in against the application?

Just to recap: in 2010 the Muslim Association applied to turn the Hillingdon Irish Centre members club into a “community centre”. They withdrew that application rather than get a refusal. But they reapplied in June 2011, this time offering 2 extra car spaces!

More here at Vlad’s place!