Greenfield is 100% correct…
To prove his point, within the tiny Somali immigrant population located mostly in the Eastern Helsinki area, their infection average was greater than the public at large. So bad it was, that a local Somali politician wanted major shopping mall closed due to in part, Somali social habits…….
If Finland had, proportionally to Sweden, a larger Muslim population from the Middle East, we possibly could have had a larger death toll due to services being exhausted from being diverted elsewhere.
Sweden Cared More About Islamophobia Than Saving Elderly in Nursing Homes From Coronavirus
“Many of the people working in nursing homes are from other countries, they’re refugees.”
The debate over the Swedish model has been concentrated around whether countries should battle the coronavirus pandemic by locking down everything or adopting the more liberal approach. This debate is as irrelevant to the actual causes of coronavirus deaths as the inhabitants of Constantinople debating whether angels have genders while the Islamic invaders were preparing to breach the city walls.
Preventing teenagers from going to the beach, as many American states and European countries have chosen to do, is going to have a very limited impact on a disease that is killing people in nursing homes.
While Sweden does have a higher rate of virus deaths than Norway or Finland, it’s not because the bars are open. 90% of the dead in Sweden were over 70 and half of them lived in special housing.
Sweden has a higher rate of deaths in care homes than Norway or Finland, and lockdown enthusiasts have struggled to explain why keeping bars open would be killing people in housing for the elderly.
But there is a crucial difference between Swedish, Norwegian, and Finnish care homes.