Middle Eastern dhimmi priest with Orwellian message: Victim needs to build trust with his assailant….

Christianity Dhimmitude Muslim persecution of Christians

Middle Eastern dhimmi priest with Orwellian message: Victim needs to build trust with his assailant….

Typical delusional dhimmi-mindset thinking…

The victims of centuries of jihad have to prove to ‘their superiors’ that they really do not mean them any harm or challenge their over-lord status. This is the result of 1400 years of being under the yoke of Islamic supremacy and needs to be given the stiff arm. Never again.

NOTE: The only ”co-existence” experienced was at the hand of benevolent rulers that didn’t inflict the full arm of Islam and any one given time. That does nothing to wipe away the reality of jihad and Islamic supremacy when it was deemed warranted.

Just listen to this drivel:

“We have to rebuild trust between Muslims and Christians even if it’s not easy”

Christians in the Middle East do not want to throw away 1,400 years of coexistence in the region. While their history has seen better and worse times, they soon hope to return to their homes in places like Syria or Iraq after the crisis ends.

FR. MTANIOS HADDAD
Archimandrite of the Greek-Catholic Church

“We’ll be back, yes. We will return to Iraq, to Mosul, to Syria, to Maalula, to Beirut and to every place we have lived. They are our homes and our lands. So, what are we going to leave them for? To whom? To what civilization? We must go back and rebuild trust between ourselves little by little. Even if it’s not easy.”

The aftermath of exacerbated extremism and the war is the main challenge, especially for minorities. In most cases they are the targets of the attacks. As such, they rightfully claim to be citizens, not just tolerated in their own land.

FR. MTANIOS HADDAD
Archimandrite of the Greco-Catholic Church

“If they want to reduce us to minorities, or treat us as if we are, or as if we are expatriates, I tell them that we do not feel that way. We are genuine citizens and landowners, who have rights and ask for a dignified life in our home country.”

More here. H/T: ChristianiaNetwork

NOTE II: Father Gabriel Naddaf would beg to differ with his co-religionist, he understands the Islamic mindset all too well.

Written by KGS

One Response

By vivienne Havalant-levijonhufvud Aug 22, 2017

The naivety of Christian Pastor’s? I fear not enough is understood about the journies of Yeshua/Jesus during his lifetime. His teaching’s are taken from the Torah, infused with Yogic & meditation techniques but you do need to read between the lines and have a full understanding of the words in today’s world. When teaching the masses simple dialogue in the form of stories have to be used. It is the masses who cannot read who follow to the letter what ever their Imams tell them to do.

Leave a Reply to vivienne Havalant-levijonhufvud Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

“We have to rebuild trust between Muslims and Christians even if it’s not easy”

“If they want to reduce us to minorities, or treat us as if we are, or as if we are expatriates, I tell them that we do not feel that way. We are genuine citizens and landowners, who have rights and ask for a dignified life in our home country.”

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply to vivienne Havalant-levijonhufvud Cancel reply