MUSLIM LEADERS IN DENMARK SAY FEAR IS KEEPING THEM AWAY FROM DEMONSTRATING AGAINST ISIS……..

Islam in Denmark Islamic leaders Islamic Mentality ISLAMIC STATE

MUSLIM LEADERS IN DENMARK SAY FEAR IS KEEPING THEM AWAY FROM DEMONSTRATING AGAINST ISIS……..

How can they condemn something that is purely Islamic!?.

Perhaps some, but I’m inclined to believe that there are many out there more than willing to use that as an opportune excuse.

h/t: Nicolai Sennels

Fear causes Muslims to stay away from anti-IS demonstration

A demonstration in Aarhus, where Muslims are encouraged to denounce the terrorist group Islamic State, has difficulty attracting participants. Muslims are afraid of being attacked or receive hate mail from IS followers in Denmark, says the Muslim community in the city

Friday prayers in the mosque at Grimhøjvej in Aarhus. Ahead of tomorrow’s demonstration against the radical Islamist group IS it has been difficult for the organizers to get the support of the city’s imams. ‘We do not take in politics,’ says their explanation.

Fear of reprisals from radical Muslim communities get Muslims to refrain from endorsing a demonstration in Aarhus tomorrow against the radical Islamist group Islamic State.It believes Mohammed Sabah Ahmad, a former spokesman for Grimhøj Mosque and organizer of the demonstration. He also says that he can not get imams to participate in or support the demonstration.

“The silence that has been among Muslims should not be construed as an endorsement of the IS ‘actions. The result, instead, that many are afraid of being attacked or receive hate mail if they publicly condemn IS, “said Mohammad Sabah Ahmad, who has experienced that acquaintances have received threats and hate mail by giving their views on IS.

One of them, who will address the demonstration, the 22-year-old Julie Kayed, who lives in Gellerupparken.

She confirms that many Muslims fear to speak against IS in the public debate:

“Many do not dare attend the rally because they are afraid. I myself am a woman and a Muslim but does not scarf. It may shock of the IS followers. In Iraq, I was of course killed by IS for not wearing the headscarf, “she says.

More here.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By wtd Sep 14, 2014

KGS asked: “How can they condemn something that is purely Islamic!?.”

Similarly: How can multiculturalists/members-of-the-cult-of-diversity condemn anyone?
By Hellosnackbar Sep 16, 2014

If they had any sense of morality they should be demonstrating!
But no !they live within the undemocratic totalitarianism which characterises the culture of Islamoturds!

Leave a Reply to Hellosnackbar Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Fear causes Muslims to stay away from anti-IS demonstration

A demonstration in Aarhus, where Muslims are encouraged to denounce the terrorist group Islamic State, has difficulty attracting participants. Muslims are afraid of being attacked or receive hate mail from IS followers in Denmark, says the Muslim community in the city

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply to Hellosnackbar Cancel reply