FINLAND: PALESTINIAN CHAIRMAN OF ‘FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY’ PREDICTS DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL ON MORNING TV PROGRAM……..

Yeah, you read that right….a Palestinian ”friendship society”.

Mr.Bolotowsky was the cat, and Aranki the ball of yarn.

The Finnish tabloid paper, Ilta Sanomat is trying to be impartial with its description of the exchange between the two men in the headline, but in reality it’s a tad disingenuous. What really happened is that Gideon Bolotowsky, former president of the Jewish Community of Helsinki, spoke with calm, clarity and common sense in comparison to the buffoonish rants coming from the chairman of the Arab ”Friendship Society” in Finland.

When one simply hasn’t a leg to stand on, you have to resort to outright lies and obfuscations. I’m sure that Gideon was pleased that the bullets Kamal Aranki was sweating wasn’t be shot at him, as well as the public getting to hear the what kind of extremist YLE had invited to its morning show. In his parting shot, Aranki stated that the Palestinians would one day take over the entire area of ”Palestine”.

In short, he was calling for the destruction of Israel on Finnish TV.

”The two state solution is temporary, because Palestine is a contiguous area, and will be united in the future.”

[A TT translation ]

Emotions began to heat up on morning TV: “You should look in the mirror!”

IS: YLE’s breakfast television viewers were given today an unusually emotional debate to follow on the Middle East.

The guests in the discussion, was former President of the Jewish Community of Helsinki, Gideon Bolotowsky, and the Arab Friendship Society Chairman, Kamal Aranki, who had views so far apart that the viewer already started to feel uncomfortable.

As you might have guessed, the vexed issue did not lead to a constructive discussion. Viewers were instead afraid because the parties began to really heat up to each other’s arguments.

Both considered the Finnish media’s monitoring of the Gaza crisis to be biased.

Bolotowsky, among other things, asked how long would the Finns stand on the sidelines, if people begin to shoot rockets from Karelia into Finland In his opinion, it should be emphasized that Egypt is also blockading of Gaza, Israel is not alone.

While in Aranki’s view Israel’s use of force is totally unreasonable and was directed against civilians. According to him, Israel is a cold-blooded murderer of civilians. Aranki wondered how a 8-year-old girl’s killing may be justified.

“You have a conspiracy theory”

– Hamas is the one who has always held to agreements, Aranki claimed.

Who shoots rockets from there, if Hamas has kept its agreement, the reporter asked.

– Since the child was playing in the area, they (Israel) killed a child. – revenge ahs brought revenge, Aranki said.

Bolotvsky wondered whether the spiral of revenge is not a consequence and not the cause.

Bolotovsky’s and Aranki’s passionate speech overlapped many times.

Arankin believes that Israel provoked Hamas with its missile defense system in order to fire rockets.

– You will always have these conspiracy theories. You should look in the mirror every once in awhile, Bolotovsky said emphatically.

Written by KGS

5 Responses

By Vasarahammer Nov 22, 2012

This evening Dennis Mitzner and Simon Elo were at A-Talk discussing with Bruno Jäntti from ICAHD and a Palestinian guy.

The problem was that the moderator was fairly ignorant about the issues and failed to control the discussion. Yle also presented a hugely distorted narrative of the history of Israel missing some of the key facts. I could not bare to watch the whole show.
1. By KGS Nov 23, 2012
  
  My friend did well enough in spite of the obvious hindrances, one point I would have used towards the end of the exchanges, when the tard said he/ they loved death more than life…would be to follow through with the obvious: why do you then complain about fatalities?
By Steve Bronfman Nov 23, 2012

”The two state solution is temporary, because Palestine is a contiguous area, and will be united in the future.”

I agree Jordan and the West Bank/Gaza should be united.

Leave a Reply to KGS Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Emotions began to heat up on morning TV: “You should look in the mirror!”

“You have a conspiracy theory”

Share this:

Written by KGS

5 Responses

Leave a Reply to KGS Cancel reply