Canada multiculturalism



The wisdom of Solomon needed to decide the fate of this multicultural bastard.

This out to be fun to watch, pull up a chair, grab your favorite drink and a bowl of popcorn and watch the show. The Left is going to have to decide between their two pet projects, which one do you think will be victorious? I always hold to the notion that discrimination is wrong, but it’s not that easy as all that.

NOTE: Vlad has a few thoughts of his own on the subject after the report. Staff

Published Thursday, Nov. 15, 2012 10:04PM EST
Last Updated Thursday, Nov. 15, 2012 10:43PM EST

Barbers in Toronto who refused to cut a woman’s hair have become the target of a human rights complaint, in a case that pits religious freedom against gender equality.

When Faith McGregor went into the Terminal Barber Shop requesting a short haircut, she was told the shop only grooms men.

The reason, co-owner Omar Mahrouk said, was that as a Muslim he could not cut the hair of a woman who was not related to him.

Read more:

56 Responses

  1. The “Terminal” Barber Shop – that sounds a bit Sweeney Todd.
    It’s getting a tad ridiculous that the only way that a Politically Correct lesbian can have an Islamically Correct haircut is to breast feed the mustard barber.

  2. Hmmm……So should Muslim Doctors only treat Male Patients?Should Muslim emergency crews only tend to Men?Should Muslim Dentists only Tend to men?I think Canada has more then a haircut to loose here.

    1. i think you;re a fuckin moron. its a barbar shop geared towards men. she shouldnt have been there and she has no right to sue. would you force a jewish deli to make pork sandwiches?

      1. Seriously Frank? Have you bothered to keep up on islam?

        islam is a cancer that must be eradicated. Not one thing has been contributed to the world by islam nor will it. Unless you call murder, torture, rape and violence a contribution.

        I hope she sues and wins BIG

        1. Whoa! Between 800 and 1100 AD (ending around the time the Christian Crusades demolished Jerusalem where Islam was flourishing) Islamic people ( aka Moslems) were the most advanced culture. The Arabs contributed al’gebra, arabic numerals, and so much more. Read your history; and check facts before you make any more ignorant statements. Try wikipedia.

          1. Do you know how the Muslims got to Jerusalem, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, etc:
            They did not invent “arabic numeral”, Hindus did. Try wikipedia.

        2. And if this were a Christian barber shop what would be your feelings? I believe gays are specifically looking for businesses who would deny them service so they can attempt to force acceptance of their lifestyle before the law.

          Si if this was a Christian-owned barber shop denying her service would you hope she sues and wins big?

      2. There was a case here in the US where two gay men wanted a bakery to make their wedding cake. The bakery refused, so the couple sued them, and won. I don’t know how the Canadian courts will handle this case, but if it happened here, she would win.

        1. I doubt it. Muslim trumps all in the US, unfortunately.

      3. Well good question….but to add to it..Should a Christian Bakery be forced by law to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple?

      4. Frankie…Frankie…are you one of them diehard raghead lovin boodie kissin retards?…tsk…tsk…what is good for the goosey is good for the gander!…:)

      5. Frank, you might revisit who the moron might be. In the States, kissing the libtards butts is a requirement.

      6. Under the law, yes. A Jewish deli could be sued for not serving a pork sandwich. This is the slippery slope the liberals didn’t think through getting upset over Christian businesses not wanting to serve homosexuals. The shoe must fit all feet.

        1. No, a Jewish deli could not be sued for not serving a pork sandwich. On what grounds? Which religion REQUIRES their members to eat pork?

          Shall we now sue McDonald’s because they do not serve pizza?

          Think…for once…please.

        2. Sorry, but that’s NOT going to happen,
          someone suing an establishment no matter what religion it’s owner is IF they do NOT have PORK on the freaking menu!
          You can’t order something then sue them over something that’s not even in the kitchen can you or on a menu unless they RAN OUT?
          If they are OUT they are OUT and no they do not have to give a rain check, just come back never as we do NOT carry PORK or HALAL foods! DUAH!

        3. Idiot there would not be pork on the menu so no they would not have to serve them.

      7. Not so fast… this is exactly what Arizona’s SB1062 was all about. You know, that legislation Gov. Brewer just vetoed because it was anti gay. You can not reserve religious or gender restrictions for Muslim and not every one of faith. ….Can’t have it both ways.

      8. Franklin

        Your a Hostile little beoch aren’t yuuu…….She iz infact a ” WANNA BE MAN “ you run around the barber chairs tuching the little muuzlims peepees

      9. But, but, but….she IS a man…weren’t you paying attention??? LOL

      10. She has every right to sue. If bakeries can be sued for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple, then a Muslim barber shop can be sued as well. Muslims aren’t special in spite of what they think.

    2. “Hmmm……So should Muslim Doctors only treat Male Patients?Should Muslim emergency crews only tend to Men?Should Muslim Dentists only Tend to men?”

      If that is what the freely choose, why not?

      1. Should Christian bakery shop owners be forced to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple ?
        A : They WERE.

        1. The law which was passed by Libtards is another example of people forcing to do things against their will.

          Why wouldn’t you just go to someone who would willingly do the work. Liberals are bullys.

  3. Goes to show, being left doesn’t make you right all the time. Some others have paid for their stupidity in a physical way, like those leftwing idiots showing up at a Salafi riot in Solingen. This idiot will be denied the right to project Western ideas like human rights issues on the lef wing’s pet project: the indomitable Muslim protected species.

    I can surmise however, with an unspecified degree of probability, that this is not going to make her think in a realistic way, at least not in the short term. She will have to suffer something way more serious than having been denied a haircut before anything this idiot says or does will begin to make sense in the long run. In the meanwhile, I wish all the likeminded assholes a merry extolment of Multiculturalist Utopia for the foreseeable future. You’ll need it (!)

  4. i think the muslim barbershop is right in this regard

    those who defend her, are themselves defending nothing less than egalitarianism and statism. any business can set their own terms of conduct, should the costumer not agree, they are free to go somewhere else.

    1. Don’t know about Canada, but I do believe here in the US the courts have ruled that the barber was in the wrong for not serving her. Does baking a cake bring anything to mind?

  5. Help me out here… if the definition of a Lesbian is a woman that is sexually attracted to women, why are they (almost) always attracted to women that look like guys? Aren’t you kind of back where you started?

  6. Islam is a threat to humanity, but any business owner has the right to refuse service to anyone at any time for any reason, without apology or explanation.

    1. I agree that a business has the right to refuse service to anyone, especially if it violates their religious principles. The interesting thing about this case will be the way the progressive left reacts to it. When the AZ bakery refused to make a cake for a gay couple, they were publicly castigated and have almost lost their business. Regardless of who the left supports, they will lose credibility but if they side with the barber, they will look like complete hypocrites for standing against the AZ baker in the same type of case.

  7. If she was in Iraq they would hang her, so she shouldn’t complain. She should go somewhere else and get her hair cut.

    1. Actually, I believe they would stone her instead of hang her. Still this is ridiculous. Why would someone want to force themselves on a service business that doesn’t want to serve them? I guess freewill is gone. News for people like this woman, your rights end when they interfere with someone else’s. You do not have the power or right to force someone to violate their religious freedom any more than they have to violate your rights by forcing you straight.

  8. Gee, where’s Eric Holder when you need em’?

  9. If it were a Hasidic Jew or some Orthodox Christian who denied her service, would there even be any debate? Most likely no. The barber is getting support solely because of the “kids gloves” with which the rest of society must treat Muslims.

  10. it had nothing to do with her being a lesbian…they don’t do women-period. it’s always fascinating that the media and the LGBTQP folks always cry “discrimination” over something that makes no sense.

  11. at first the headlines confused me…why would a woman want a haircut from a mens place…then I saw her picture. Now it makes sense!

  12. you really have to love the lesbian agenda as shown here….i was confused at first i thought this dude talking was the lesbian….well anyway just cut their hair as requested and shave them fn BALD….

  13. I am a die hard “Infidel” and have never agreed with anything Islamic. However, I find that I must agree with this Muslim barber. Aside from the fact that Islam is not my cup of tea, this barber had every right to refuse service to this lesbian. The right to choose who you wish to do business with, especially when it’s your own business, supersedes any other “right” or consideration. The Lesbo is simply an activist who was looking for someone to sue. These people need to get a life and quit these bullying tactics of forcing people to accept their abhorrent lifestyle. Force feeding only works for so long before the one being forced fights back!

  14. Leave it to anyone from the militant GLBT crowd and this is what you get.

  15. “…would you force a jewish deli to make pork sandwiches?”

    “…any business can set their own terms of conduct, should the costumer not agree, they are free to go somewhere else.”

    Tell this to the baker that did not want to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.

  16. I wonder how George Takei feels about this? I wonder if he’ll get involved in this “Civil Rights Issue”?

  17. It seems to me that this is kind of trivial, as with the cake debacle. I would understand if this person was refused a bank loan on the premise of her sexuality/gender. Though maybe the men at the barber shop could have handled the situation better.

    It has also been my experience that customers who force themselves on an unwilling business or service will always get subpar service. If I was forced to give someone a haircut that I didn’t want to give, I would probably do a bad job.

  18. the lesbian might have rights but so does the muslim barber….

  19. I think we need to push the GAy agenda on the MUUZLUMZ and get some GAY muuzlimz to come out of the closet……I am sure they make women wear mask and rape them from behind because they are infact all GAY

  20. The business owner ought to have the right to refuse service. This was an ironclad civil right (the right to choose with whom one will freely associate) that the USA foolishly threw away in the name of civil rights. The segregated lunch counters and such would have gone away anyway given time, but the Congress and the White House at the time of the Civil Rights Act was hasty, and haste makes bad law. Plenty of people (Goldwater, just to name one) complained at the time that we would come to regret giving the government authority to force people to associate, and here it is.

    In this particular case, my bet is on the Muslim barbers. All they have to do is to threaten a few haircuts from the neck up, and the homosexual lobby will quickly cave. When bullies collide, the one credibly willing to get physical first wins.

  21. Ignoring all the ignorant bigoted comments already made, I want to point out this is neither a religious nor a sexuality issue. This is a woman, regardless of her sexuality, intentionally going into an establishment, regardless of the owners religion, with the intention of forcing them to service her. She knew going in that it was set up for men only and she knew she would not get service. Her intention was to make a big deal about it and probably assumed it would become an LGBT issue. Her sexuality would not even come in to play here if she had long hair and wore tons of make up. Her intention was clear and she is just looking to stir shit up.

  22. He had every to tell the skank to hit the road!

  23. Could the owner of a lunch counter refuse service to male customers because they were black?

  24. I’m sorry I can’t help it, this really bothered me :

    The first line below the picture of Solomon and his judgement of the baby between the two mommas.

    “This out to be fun to watch, pull up a chair, grab your favorite drink and a bowl of popcorn and watch the show.”

    “This ought to be fun to watch, pull up a chair, grab your favorite drink and a bowl of popcorn and watch the show.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.