NORWEGIAN TERRORIST ANDERS BREIVIK PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACK OVER NINE YEARS AGO, PREDATING THE COUNTERJIHAD MOVEMENT…….

Anders Brievik's terrorist attack Norway

NORWEGIAN TERRORIST ANDERS BREIVIK PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACK OVER NINE YEARS AGO, PREDATING THE COUNTERJIHAD MOVEMENT…….

Enough with the “counter-jihad / Fjordman caused this mayhem in Norway” meme, the man had been planning this act of terror for over nine freaking years! This is long before any of the known anti-Islamization voices ever got moving, and way before they became a recognizable force, and four years before this blog, the TT, went online. This pours some mighty cold water on the MSM’s smear campaign against us. KGS

The terror was planned over nine years ago

24. July 2011 7:55 Udland

NRK (Norwegian state media) The detained Anders Breivik describes in a 1,500-page manifesto, how he was over nine years, planning the two terror acts on Friday in Oslo’s center and the on island of Utøya, as well as the benefits of working/operating on your own.

ALSO, read the Norwegian state media’s take on the Counter-jihad dismissing any connection to the loon murderer.

Written by KGS

5 Responses

By Sisu Jul 24, 2011

Saved 250 from the fjord
– Asked to leave area

– Where is the police helicopter? Where is the rescue helicopter?
Called desperately 113 for ambulances while picking up campers from the fjord. Private hero rescuers were told by state/commune coordinating ambulance unit AMK, to leave and seek security because police hadn’t yet cleared area.
//www.dagbladet.no/2011/07/24/nyheter/utoya/massemord/17439479/

This was the program they had planned for 2011
//oslo.auf.no/-/event/show/261804_utoeya-se-hele-programmet-her/4456281?ref=mst
By person of the book Jul 24, 2011

9 years? Still I find it hard to believe that he did it all by himself. I don’t want to get involved in conspiracy theories, but the story so far is a little odd.
By Sisu Jul 25, 2011

//www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2018280/Why-did-police-long-reach-island-massacre.html
By Herbert Stenson Aug 02, 2011

Based on the evidence, it seems undeniable that Breivik was a Zionist and supporter of Israel. The group on Utoya had protested Israel regarding Palestinian affairs in the days before the attack! //www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDr6SjPMRzs
1. By KGS Aug 03, 2011
  
  Oh I see, it’s the Jooooooos. Truth be told, Breivik was only interested in promoting his own agenda, that being, murder to jettison his name into the media’s stratosphere. His father was a high ranking Labour Lefty, and he had an axe to grind with him as well, so he thought he’s whack to moles with the same whack.

Leave a Reply to Sisu Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.