ISLAM IN THE USA Islam is deception Lying Muslims Sharia


This is what sharia amounts to in the end.

Muslim taqiyya and dawa propagandist has “sharia law” night to explain why there shouldn’t be any linkage between the desert cult ideology and terrorism.

H/T Scottish Infidel

Muslims explain “Sharia Law” to Blount Co community

WBIR.Com: Wednesday night, East Tennessee Muslims openly discussed a part of their faith that has become a controversial topic in the state.

From talk radio to the state capitol, there are concerns that the “Sharia Law” is connected to terrorism.

At the meeting, local muslims held an open forum in an effort to explain their religion and dispel some fear and misunderstanding.

In front of a small crowd, Nadeem Siddiqi tried to explain “Sharia.”

“I think the best thing is to create dialogue, and with dialogue is understanding,” said Siddiqi.

Here’s the media report of the event. The only good thing about it is that the meeting was small, and more than likely just full of the already convinced.

The Tundra Tabloids’ friend and colleague, Sam Solomon, an apostate from Islam and scholar of sharia law would greatly disagree with the above propagandist. KGS

6 Responses

  1. Sam Solomon deserves more credits! Do you have more material KGS?

  2. If you or your readers feel that anything untrue is being said at these events then i would like to PERSONALLY invite you to come and challenge the info in person…..William Coley organizer of sharia lectures

    1. When one hears of sharia, one hears of Islamization, by increments, steps, until the non-Muslim surroundings finally end up conforming to the Mohammedan’s precepts. Nope, it’s up to you to publicize what your meetings have spoken about and let it be judged by what we already know about sharia. Your Islamic system does not only deal with private Muslim religious life, but in its entirety, it also dictates to the non-Muslim as well. The onus is upon you to prove why sharia is, all of a sudden, not detrimental to society, when history proves it is.

      Oh and by the way, I personally know a Christian Sudanese scholar who has lived under sharia, and would vehemently disagree with your assertions that sharia is “harmless”, “being just another way”. It’s not harmless, never was and never will be.

    2. Also, as Robert Spencer notes: “Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, whom John Esposito classes as a “reformist,” says that “the Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including “the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-`ashriyyah, Al-Ja`fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”

      So I ask you William Coley, do you dispute Sheik Qaradawi’s contention about the schools of Islamic jurisprudence? As with the writings of Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler, to truly know and understand the Koran, hadiths and sharia, is to despise them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.