Amsterdam: Syrian LGBT refugees assaulted by “Turkish or Moroccan man”. Security laughs and bans victims from store…….

Dutch newspaper Het Parool broke the story on 12 September, about Tarek, a 24-year-old Syrian refugee, who has been living in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, for a year. He thought he was in for a treat, when he and four of his friends went out shopping on Thursday. Zara is the group’s favourite store and they used to come there regularly. Used to, because when they were in the shop on Thursday, a man began harassing them near the registers on the first floor. According to Tarek, the man, whom he thinks to be in his mid-twenties and of Turkish or Moroccan descent, started to threaten the five friends when he heard them talk to each other lovingly in Arabic.

“We were bad Muslims, we deserved to die because we are homosexual and transgender. He shouted ‘Allahu Akbar!’ through the store a couple of times.“

E., 42-years-old and to scared to have his name in the papers, was hit in the face hard. Two security guards noticed the row and started to direct everyone downstairs, out of the shop. There, the man noticed one of the trans-women in the group and aimed his anger at her, ripping the dress from her shoulder in an attempt to attack her. E. says:

“He shouted she was a ‘kafir‘, an unbeliever who must be killed.“

What made the situation worse, is that the security guards were not inclined to help them. According to Tarek:

“They did nothing to protect us and laughed at us. The man tried attacking us multiple times, spat in our faces, shouted that he was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and that he was going to kill us. And nobody did anything.“

Not long afterwards, the friends were asked to leave and banned for a year, being threatened with a charge of disturbing the public peace if they were to enter the store again.

More here….

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Truth Sep 14, 2017

Lgbt community wants to import as many illegal immigrant aliens as possible.
One of the refuges just love them back ..
By VERK Sep 15, 2017

Didn’t they know that the West and the Western leftists in particular have sold them down the river in favour of the muzztard savages? Tsk tsk.
Only muslim rights and feelings matter in Europe now.

Leave a Reply to VERK Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply to VERK Cancel reply