JIHAD IN AUSTRALIA: MUSLIM SHOUTS ALLAHU AKBAR KNIFING FOUR PEOPLE AT SHOPPING CENTER, SHOT THREE TIMES……

HORROR IN HORNSBY

Tim Blair

Thursday, June 09, 2016 (2:27pm)

Four people reportedly injured in a Sydney shopping centre knife confrontation:

It is believed police shot a 23-year-old man wielding a knife at least three times after a stabbing.

It is understood as many as four people have suffered injuries, including to their lower limbs and abdomen. They range from serious to critical.

Local businessman Geoff Milner saw the attacker walking through the lunchtime market stalls holding a knife.

“I saw this old couple staring at him and that’s when I realised he had a full knife,” he said.

Mr Milner said police arrived shortly after.

“When I walked out of the cafe he was just standing there, like he was waiting for them.”

Early reports indicated the attacker was alive following the police response. More to come.

UPDATE. Seven’s Robert Ovadia reports the man was heard shouting “Allahu Akhbar”.

UPDATE II:

Assistant Commissioner Denis Clifford said the armed man was known to police and had been reported missing from a nearby psychiatric centre yesterday.

“It will be alleged the man approached police with a large carving knife, the officers each fired shots at the offender and he was wounded several times,” he said.

UPDATE III. A witness reports:

Mr Yeom said he believed three shots were fired and it appeared police were aiming for the man’s legs.

More here. H/T: Warren Raymond

Written by KGS

4 Responses

By Raymond Jun 10, 2016

My understanding is that the man is psychotic – possibly schizophrenic.

A psychologist had approved a request for day release from the psychiatric facility for a day or two; he did not return.

Police should have been notified about this but they weren’t.. The injuries to the elderly shoppers were the result of bullets ricocheting off the knife wielding man.

The psychologist made a gross error of judgment in recommending his short-term release.
1. By KGS Jun 12, 2016
  
  It always seems to work in that direction ….. lets see how it plays out.
By oliver grant Jun 10, 2016

//ninjapundit.blogspot.com/2016/06/australian-mock-terrorist-mental-case.html
Australian mock terrorist mental case wielding knife and 3 bystanders shot after rushing police shouting Allahu Akhbar
Australian mental case wielding knife and 3 bystanders shot after rushing police shouting Allahu Akhbar — ===

It’s only a mock terrorist case because he was mentally ill and not capable of mentally competent terrorism. No press report identifies the religion of the suspect for some reason, apparently because it is obviously not relevant to this case.

3 injured by police shooting suspect arrested June 9, 2016 Australian mental case and 3 bystanders shot after rushing police shouting Allahu Akhbar In Australia 3 bystanders shoppers are injured when a mideastern man rushed at police in a crowded Hornsby mall and were forced to shoot at him after he threatened to kill them if they did not shoot. While witnesses reported the barefooted man was “babbling incoherently” and shouting “Allahu Akhbar” Police ruled out terrorism as a motive as they considered it a simple mental health issue. The man was known to them and had escaped a psychiatric center the day before.

*Tags

Australia
Bystander victim
Mental terrorist
Mideast Muslim suspect
Police involved shooting
Setuip
Terrorism (incredibly) ruled out
By Bill Jun 11, 2016

The man shot might be able to sue if the policewomen who shot him was deliberately aiming at his legs. The reasoning is that if deadly force was required to be used, then you don’t shoot to disable via hits to extremities, since that implies that the use of deadly force was not required and the task of stopping the man may have been achieved by other means.The normal advice I have heard is to shoot to centre of mass and keep shooting until the mortal threat is over and then to cease fire. However, I am not a lawyer, so nobody should be taking my advice.

Leave a Reply to Bill Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.