FINNISH GOVERNMENT MINISTER SAYS TERRORISTS DESERVE WELFARE BENEFITS…….

Unfreakingbelievable

KELA is the Finnish national social welfare (also reitement) insurance organization, and the minister in question is, Laura Kaarina Räty, Finnish National Coalition Party member. She is the former Minister of Social Affairs and Health.

Belonging to a terrorist group will not stop Kela social aid

LEHTIKUVA

The Finns Party MP Mika Raatikainen made a written question to the granting of financial support in society for persons engaged in terrorist groups.

Known to the authorities of about 40 people who have gone to Syria from Finland or elsewhere in the Middle East to join terrorist groups.

– The actual number may be higher, and some of the terrorists probably already returned back to Finland, says Raatikainen.

– I asked Minister Laura Räty what steps the government is taking that taxpayers have to finance in the form of social assistance to activities of the persons who have joined terrorist groups in Syria or elsewhere, and who are known by the authorities.

The Finns funded

Minister’s response was what Raatikainen believes to be scandalous.

– Räty said that the belonging to a terrorist organization in Syria or elsewhere, is not a reason to discontinue the payment of social security benefits granted by the Social Insurance Institution for such activities or accompanying family members residing abroad.

– This Finnish taxpayers are forced to finance terrorist activities. This does not go to my sense of justice, in the least, Raatikainen wonders.

The Finns

NOTE: The Finnish government is in direct violation of UNSCR 1373, member states shall fund or come to aid terror organizations.

Written by KGS

3 Responses

By rbockman Jul 24, 2015

why would anyone take the Finns seriously, don’t we remember which side they were on during the second world war
1. By Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Jul 24, 2015
  
  I thought they were trying to be neutral in WW2 weren’t they? If they in any way supported Germany – it is because they had a common enemy – Russia.
  
  They were always trying to get away from Russia and had major territorial disputes over Karelia. They had their own private war with Russia (i.e. USSR) in 1947 – so they definitely were not pro-Soviet.
By Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Jul 24, 2015

“Räty said that the belonging to a terrorist organization in Syria or elsewhere, is not a reason to discontinue the payment of social security benefits”

She’s an idiot. Every other sane non-islamic country cuts benefits to terrorist organisation members when they travel to islamic shitholes to spill blood..

If she is so interested in helping them – let her personally give them the money taken out of her fat weekly wage. That will quickly show how willing to help her poor persecuted terrorist friends she really is.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.