SWEDISH ELECTIONS: LEFTARDS OVERTAKE PSEUDO NEO-STATIST CONSERVATIVES, SWEDEN DEMOCRATS DOUBLE THEIR NUMBERS…….

SD Sweden Sweden Democrats Swedish Politics

SWEDISH ELECTIONS: LEFTARDS OVERTAKE PSEUDO NEO-STATIST CONSERVATIVES, SWEDEN DEMOCRATS DOUBLE THEIR NUMBERS…….

After all the demonization, the SD party makes enormous gains.

And for the record, it’s not the ”anti-immigration” Sweden Democrats that the fake media love to smear them with, but sensible, gradual immigration that ensures it’s a benefit to Swedish society, as well as contributing to the full assimilation of the new immigrants.

In other words, a complete rejection of the massive failure of multiculturalism, which by default, means the balkanization of society, with the ruling elites choosing which constituency is more worthy of heaping largesse on at the expense of ”the other”.

Sweden election: Social Democrats ‘in the lead’ – exit poll

Sweden's Prime Minister and leader of the Moderate Party, Fredrik Reinfeldt casts his ballot at a polling station in the Stockholm suburb of Taeby.

Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt took office in 2006 and is the country’s longest serving conservative leader

Sweden’s opposition Social Democrats appear set to win most votes in the general election, an exit poll says.

Public broadcaster SVT said the centre-left bloc would get 44.8%, with Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s centre-right coalition trailing with 39.7%.

The anti-immigration Sweden Democrats had 10.5% while the Feminist Initiative that supports the left got over 4%.

Mr Reinfeldt, who took office in 2006, has been praised for how he dealt with the economic crisis.

A Social Democrats win would be a return to normality in Sweden. They have not been in opposition for so long since first taking power in 1920.

Polling stations opened at 06:00 GMT and closed at 18:00 GMT.

More here.

Written by KGS

3 Responses

By Adam Sep 15, 2014

Apparently, the SD got 13%. The center right could apparently form a government with them, but refuses. Are my facts correct?
1. By KGS Sep 15, 2014
  
  you’re exactly right Adam, they would rather not form a government, than do business with the SD, which has by the way, voted almost exclusively in line with their politics in the parliament.
By Adam Sep 15, 2014

So, if the left can’t form a majority government and can’t get 50% to pass various left-wing measures, how can that possibly work? Aren’t fresh elections required?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.