ANDY BOSTOM ON TOM TRENTO SHOW DISCUSSING IRAN SHARIA-BASED PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS AND HAJJ AMIN EL-HUSSEINI’S CANONCIAL ISLAMIC JEW-HATRED…….

Andrew Bostom Hajj Amin al-Husseini Islamic anti-Semitism

ANDY BOSTOM ON TOM TRENTO SHOW DISCUSSING IRAN SHARIA-BASED PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS AND HAJJ AMIN EL-HUSSEINI’S CANONCIAL ISLAMIC JEW-HATRED…….

By KGS11 years ago2

Thanks Andy, great discussion with Tom!

How any scholar can continue to pimp the meme of German Nazi anti-Semitic influence on the Mufti of Jerusalem after hearing all the evidence to the contrary (who was spouting anti-Semitic screeds long before the rise of National Socialism), is beyond me.

My Trento TV Interview on Iran’s Sharia-Based Persecution of Christians and Hajj Amin el-Husseini’s Canonical Islamic Jew-Hatred

An extended discussion of the Sharia-basis for Iran’s persecution of its Christian population—ignored by even the “conservative media” as described here—and the canonical Islamic Jew-hatred of Hajj Amin el-Husseini, ignored by the “academy” which absurdly recasts it as “Nazism,” or amongst the more “erudite” of its claque, a sui generis “Nazified Islam,” discussed at length here.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By wtd Nov 01, 2013

The segment in this interview in which Dr. Bostom described the re-implementation of Najis regulations against the Armenian population in Iran sounded familiar. Although I can no longer access Dr. Bostom’s blog or site because of some technical error ( Forbidden, don’t have permission to access /blog/ on this server due to a 500 Internal Server Error error???). . . .I was, however able to pull up the familiar reference which will prove useful in the future as halal/shariah finance issues impact non-Muslim transactions in the West:

Eliz Sanasarian‘s important study of non—Muslim religious minorities during the first two decades after 1979 provides a striking illustration of the practical impact of this renewed najis consciousness:

In the case of the Coca—Cola plant, for example, the owner (an Armenian) fled the country, the factory was confiscated, and Armenian workers were fired. Several years later, the family members were allowed to oversee the daily operations of the plant, and Armenians were allowed to work at the clerical level; however, the production workers remained Muslim. Armenian workers were never rehired on the grounds that non—Muslims should not touch the bottles or their contents, which may be consumed by Muslims.

Thus, if formal badging requirements for non—Muslims were now to be implemented, these measures would simply mark the further retrogression of Iran’s non—Muslim religious minorities, completing in full their descent to a pre—1925 status. (American Thinker 2006)
1. By KGS Nov 01, 2013
  
  Well said and noted WTD, thanks for this!

Leave a Reply to wtd Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.