ANTI-FREE SPEECH KURD WHO PROTESTED AGAINST KORAN BEING BURNED AT NORWEGIAN EMBASSY IN HELSINKI, WINS CITY COUNCIL SEAT IN TURKU FINLAND……..

By KGS11 years ago4

Possibly connected with mullah Krekar

I thought he looked familiar. Muhammad Azzizi demonstrated at the Norwegian embassy in March of this year, in regards to two Kurds who burned copies of the koran, demanding that they be convicted of ”hate speech”. He’s pictured second from the right, holding a sign that reads:

“Freedom of speech doesn’t give right to defame another’s religion”.

So that’s who was voted into the local city council in Turku Finland, an anti-free speech Muslim, who will push his agenda as hard and as far as he can. You can bet on it.

TS.fi

Turku City Council renewed considerably. Läpimenijöissä has 28 new faces. For example, the True Finns are new to all delegates.

At the same time the Turku council is even more multicultural. Three immigrant candidates went through, which is now represented by a single Green party’s Roda Hassan. She has new credentials.

The largest immigrant jack pot was the Conservative Party’s, Mohammad Azizi. A 27-year-old from Turku, Azizi gathered nearly 500 votes. Another new immigrant that was elected was Alas Ali.

Yle Turku election expert, political scientist Erkka Railo deemed it a positive development that immigrants take part in the elections and the candidates find various party lists.

Written by KGS

4 Responses

By Vasarahammer Oct 30, 2012

Mohammed Azizi also participated in the anti-Israeli demonstration after the Jihad flotilla incident in 2010.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/israelin-vastainen_mielenosoitus_taytti_kavelykadun_turussa/5574398
By Cloudberry Oct 31, 2012

This is how it goes. If only a few, then it’s all smiles and being humble and polite. When numbers grow, all will vote for their own to gain political power. More growth will bring demands. Then comes the riots, jihad through gang rapes, exclusively muslim schools where sharia law is taught, Western girls fearing to walk outside without a head covering, and dhimmi politicians who whore themselves for votes and the allowance of islamic prayers screaming out on the neighborhoods 5 times a day.

I don’t want to live under sharia law and I don’t want a ‘golden dawn’ situation!

Leave a Reply to Vasarahammer Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

4 Responses

Leave a Reply to Vasarahammer Cancel reply