Obama vetting Obama's Socialist Pals



 Gee, now that would explain that bow, now wouldn’t it?

It would also explain Obama’s ties to Rashid Khalidi, and the countless dinners with his family, even the one held at an event honoring this former PLO spokesman, of which there is a video that the LA Times is sitting on, refusing to make public.

H/T: Reagan Coalition

From The Blaze: 1979 Newspaper Column Unearthed, Obama’s Arab Ties Coming to Focus…


Here is the gist of the pretty in-depth article from The Blaze. Arabs were looking to gain influence in the United States by funding promising American blacks. Mansour is alleged to have helped Obama get into Harvard and even provide aid.

From The Blaze:

According to a newspaper column released in 1979 by Vernon Jarrett, father-in-law of Obama confidente Valerie Jarrett, President Barack Obama might owe his success to a very controversial benefactor.

The story is back in the news, and this time, Mansour’s disavowals may be less easy to take. Reporter Frank Miele of Montana’s Daily InterLake newspaper unearthed the following 1979-era newspaper column by Jarrett discussing a plan by several influential African-American businessmen with ties to the Arab world to funnel their cash toward promising young African-American students. Among those businessmen was Mansour himself.

The hitch? Mansour himself is quoted in the article. “The first indications of Arab help to American blacks may be announced in December,” he is quoted as saying.

Now, as this column was written 9 years before Obama’s admission to Harvard Law School, it‘s scarcely demonstrative proof of any involvement by Mansour with Obama’s education, if indeed such involvement ever occurred.

Press release from the Jamaican University of Technology (emphasis added):

Al-Mansour who made news in 2008 when it was revealed that he had  been a patron of Barack Obama and had recommended him for admission to Harvard Law School in 1998, is co-founder of the International law firm of Al-Waleed, Al-Talal and Al-Mansour and Special Advisor to Saudi Arabian Prince, His Royal Highness Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulazziz.

Read more

One Response

  1. This pattern of deception naturally filters through the dualism within Islam, providing opposing truths to apply appropriately for taking advantage of each situation as it arises.

    Dr, Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for PoliticalIslam.com defines this contradiction as dualism.

    “The doctrine of both religious and political Islam is based on dualism and submission. The religious doctrine is of no concern to a kafir. It is the politics that concerns kafirs. Dualism is the key to understanding Islam. On the surface many parts of the Koran contradict each other. The usual explanation is that the older, nicer verses are abrogated by the later verses. But in reality all of the Koran is true since it comes from the only god, Allah. Allah is perfection, and therefore, the contradictory statements in the Koran are all true. This violates Aristotelian kafir logic, but it defines the Islamic dualistic logic. In Islam two contradictory things can both be true at the same time. So for every one of those statistically insignificant “good” verses, each one is weak, and the stronger harsh and violent verses are stronger. Contradictions are integral to Islamic logic. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.” Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The circumstances govern which verse is used.

    Robert Spencer, director of JihadWatch.org & Gregory Davis document the principle of abrogation in ISLAM 101.

    Al-Mansour’s truth/denial is triggered by the advantage such ‘truth’ yields. See quote from above:

    “Al-Mansour who made news in 2008 when it was revealed that he had been a patron of Barack Obama and had recommended him for admission to Harvard Law School in 1998, “

    . . .just as <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhKuunp8D8&feature=player_embeddedObama claims one ‘truth’ to this nation while contradicting that ‘truth’ with another ‘truth’ in Turkey 04/09.

    The pattern becomes unavoidably visible once one recognizes the dualistic foundation of the doctrine of Islam.

    Lan astaslem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.