US/Israeli Relations



Time for any pro-Israel Obama supporting fence sitters to finally get down off the fence.

How much more proof is needed that the Obama regime will allow the Iranians the bomb, by the ”slow as you go approach” which has just allowed the genocidal mullahs more time to enrich their uranium?

Two new signs point to the deepening rift between the Obama administration and the Israeli government over how to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons efforts: a reported confrontation between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the U.S. ambassador to Israel and a statement by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey that he doesn’t want to be “complicit” in an Israeli strike on Iran.

The Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot headlined its Friday paper “The Confrontation” with a photo of Netanyahu on one side and President Obama alongside U.S. ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro, on the other. Veteran diplomatic correspondent Shimon Schiffer reports that during a private meeting last week, Netanyahu very undiplomatically attacked Obama and his advisers over what he views as their ineffective Iran policy. The incident took place when Republican congressman and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers visited Netanyahu’s office for an Iran briefing, accompanied by the U.S. ambassador to Israel. Schiffer reports (translated via hard copy by TheBlaze in Israel):

Netanyahu, according to a source who participated in the meeting, was particularly surly and stressed. At the start of the meeting, he opened with a sharp attack on the Obama administration which according to him has not done enough on the Iranian issue. “Instead of effectively pressuring Iran, Obama and his people are pressuring us not to attack the nuclear facilities,” he said, and then moved on to a harsh criticism of the administration’s pronouncements indicating there is still room for diplomacy. “The time has run out,” he said resolutely.

More here.

2 Responses

  1. I Haven’t been able to download the full article – its not coming up.

    But the simple difference is that ‘zero’ (empty suit) is only interested in saving his own skin so as he can strut his stuff for the next four years; Israel is in the cross hairs however, and that’s a big difference.

    And to be ‘complicit’ in any proposed strike by Israel translates as being potentially involved in the planning of some nefarious evil activity.

    Shaprio’s weasel words do him and ‘zero’no credit.

  2. Really crappy photoshopping in the “I’m a dinner jacket” photo. Why fake it? Everyone knows he’s stark raving bonkers… just like Bush 1&2 and Romny…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.