ANDERS BREIVIK MURDERED NOT FOR AN IDEOLOGY BUT FOR HIMSELF……..

He could have chosen the animal rights movement.

According to this criminal psychologist, the Norwegian murderer, Anders Breivik, only used ideologies to achieve his own stardom, this is a mighty big difference. He’s a terrorist for what he did, but it’s more along the lines of criminality, not classical terrorist (political) motives, even though he spouted them.

He used the ideology of the anti-Islamization movement in order to grace the tabloids with his name to satisfy his criminal narcissistic psyche, it’s the main reason why he cared little for the extreme damage he would certainly cause the movement he claimed (still does) to care about. He’s a narcissistic psychotic. It wasn’t about the ideology, it was about himself.

Thanks to Vlad for the heads up on the interview.

NOTE: The fool media and self anointed elites never cease to amaze. In spite of all of the Founding Fathers being right in both words and deed (in this case Thomas Jefferson) none could ever be held responsible for a gunman murdering 67 people in a socialist ‘youth camp’ in Norway, just because he claims some inspiration from their writings. KGS

I’M NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS OF THIS MURDERER, ANY MORE THAN FJORDMAN IS!

NOTE: Nor would I blame, J.D.Salinger, author of The Catcher in the Rye, for Mark David Chapman’s shooting of John Lennon, Robert John Bardo’s shooting of Rebecca Schaeffer, and John Hinckley, Jr.’s assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan.

Written by KGS

3 Responses

By person of the book Jul 27, 2011

Ezra Levant & Professor John Lott: did gun control fail Norway? //t.co/1MRYVxX
By Sisu Jul 27, 2011

They, the left, don’t what to see.
By Durotrigan Jul 28, 2011

Apologies if you’ve already seen this, but the following short video news report from Oslo is horrific: all rapes over the past year in the city have been carried out by non-Western (often Muslim) immigrants, as have almost all recorded rapes in the Norwegian capital over the last five years: //durotrigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/rape-gift-from-norways.html

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.