Islam in the UK


The joke of ‘secure Britain’: Vile banned militant extremist strolls through Heathrow immigration as 200 Somalian criminals are allowed to stay due to human rights

Impunity: Banned radical extremist Raad Salah walking free in the streets of Leicester yesterday 

Impunity: Banned radical extremist Raed Salah walking free in the streets of Leicester yesterday

Britain’s powerlessness to control who has the right to be in this country was glaringly exposed last night by two extraordinary cases.

In the first, an anti-Semitic preacher of hate whom the Home Secretary had banned from entering Britain was able to stroll in through Heathrow.

Last night, Raed Salah was giving a lecture organised by Islamist radicals to a large crowd in Leicester, and today he was due to speak at Westminster at the invitation of Left-wing Labour MPs.

In the second, a bombshell ruling by European judges blocked the deportation of some 200 Somali criminals back to their homeland.

The Strasbourg court said the men, including drug dealers and serial burglars, might be persecuted in war-torn Somalia, and that they must be allowed to stay to protect their human rights.

So, irrespective of how  heinous their crimes or the danger they present to the public, Britain has no power to expel them.

The ruling by the European Court of Human Rights stemmed from appeals against deportation by two asylum seekers convicted  of a string of serious offences including burglary, making threats to kill and drug dealing.

But it will now also apply to 214 other similar cases which have been lodged with the court using Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment, is an ‘absolute’ right, meaning that it applies regardless of the offences committed.

The two men, who were both granted thousands in legal aid to fight their cases, will now be released from immigration detention centres and will be free to walk the streets.

They were jointly awarded more than £20,000 for costs and expenses.

Critics accused the Government of rolling over to the demands of the court, and branded the Human Rights Act a ‘criminals’ charter’.

Backbench Tory MP Douglas Carswell said: ‘The pathetic truth is that we do not have control over our borders, and these cases quite clearly show that we do not control not only who comes in to the country but who we choose to remove.

Read more:


4 Responses

  1. You read this stuff and ask yourself: How can this sort of thing happen in any society where you are entitled to assume sane prudent policies will surely prevail?

    Obviously not so in the UK.

    What a mess.

  2. Its the EU and the European court of Human Rights to which all European nations have signed on to.

    We need to get out of the EU as well as that unaccountable court – and that aint likely anytime soon.

  3. I’m sure the UK has a number of desolate, windswept North Sea islands under its sovereignty that could easily be converted into serviceable, if not exactly comfortable waiting places for these status-pending aliens from the tropical climes. Is this rocket science? “It’s amazing what you’re unable to accomplish, if you really don’t want to.”

    If Brussels objects, then send them to Belgium.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.