Costs of Mass Immigration Islamic Immigration multiculturalism Norway


The Tundra Tabloids would like to thank Fjordman for forwarding this article originally published in Norwegian and at the DocumentNo. website, and for Cecile for translating it into English. Many thanks. Cecilie has also wrote a piece on the article by Christian Skaug, viewable after the article below the fold, here’s a brief excerpt:

Cecilie: The below article is interesting in what it doesn’t say: That ethnic Norwegians will soon be outnumbered by foreigners of Muslim descent. After all, like all European countries, Norway has no problem with Chinese, Vietnamese, Swedes or Indians. It is invariably the Muslims creating problems, fear and uncertainty.

The silent revolution

CHRISTIAN SKAUG 30.04.2011 at. 16.27

Document No. One of the most fascinating aspects of Oslo’s slow but sure transformation into a city with a foreign majority, is how it all happens fairly quiet, and with by far not everybody noticing it.

When it just became public knowledge that the majority of the city’s population will be of foreign origin well before 2030, and thus in majority among the younger half of the population – the future population in other words- long before that time, the news was received with more or less a shrug, a shrug whose effect was that the news did not get the reaction required for attaching itself firmly in the public consciousness.

Or was it perhaps gaping disbelief mixed with a painful sense of having been thoroughly deceived, which in turn meant that the news did not become a particularly controversial topic? Did it in informed circles in two nanoseconds go from being a paranoid fantasy you could not mention to a matter of course which it would be uncool to admit that one had not long ago sussed?

When a certain type of information reaches the majority of the population, it can roughly be done in two ways: either because the major national media decide to give it a certain amount of coverage, or because the news spontaneously spreads like wildfire among the population . (And the latter often leads to the national media sooner or later reviewing the case, ie, they can either set the agenda themselves, or they can take things into consideration.)

But the knowledge that the capital will surely lose its Norwegian majority during the lifetime of most of its present inhabitants, has not been spread in any of these two ways.

That the media does not give this demographic revolution – with consequences for hundreds of thousands of people’s lives – significant attention, can be attributed to herd mentality. As long as the bell sheep decides that this shall not be questioned, the other sheep fail to do it. It is tragic, but essentially banal, and easily understandable from the observation that the people in question are in thrall to their defects.

Far more interesting, on the other hand, as a social psychological phenomenon that awareness of, and upset over the ongoing revolution in Oslo has not spread like wildfire all by itself, without mass media attention. Those who see what is going on, do not raise the issues in public, and they don’t raise them at parties. One may begin to wonder whether these topics aren’t even discussed within the family. Does one decide to move from Oslo without even having to admit to one’s spouse – or even oneself – that one find it most pleasant to be surrounded by one’s own kind?

The questions may seem absurd, but considering how little the public know about things that many thousands of people must have realised, it’s hard not to ask them.

A Document reader refers to an obscure Web site belonging to Akershus University Hospital. There one can read that Manuela Ramin-Osmundsen, Project Manager in the South-East in briefly comments :

Statistics from Oslo University now show that 7 out of 10 mothers have an immigrant background.

The article is dated 11 November 2009, ie after hospital Ullevål and Aker was merged with organizational Rikshospitalet University Hospital in Oslo. The vast majority of births in the capital take place at one of these three hospitals, do they not? Does this mean that only 30% of the newborns in Oslo currently have a Norwegian background? If the true figure is 30% or 40% may not matter greatly. The point is that these are numbers that would surprise most people, despite the fact that anyone who might have stayed at a maternity ward in Oslo last year, must have seen the development close up.

What do a doctor, nurse or midwife observing how Norwegians are fewer and fewer year by year? I refuse to believe that there is information that does not make an impression. What do expecting parents who see that their children are a minority in their age group think about this? And whatever they think: Why have they not they shared their thoughts with enough people that it is an indisputable and well-known public truth that Oslo in a few years will be a Norwegian city only in patches?

The explanation can hardly be any other than that it’s taboo to say that, Norwegians prefer to live among other Norwegians. It is a taboo so strong and so deep seated that one must believe the reason people keep quiet can’t be based on sense. The Taboo must to such a degree have become a part of one’s mind, that the reaction comes almost from the bowels: Stress hormones come trickling out, and it hurts physically to challenge the silence.

Europeans have been a link between conscience and political correctness that makes them go around with constant feelings of guilt: We owe it to share and make room for the others, to the extent where we declare our own culture out of date. This is a strange psychological phenomenon. It has occurred during a relatively short time, and people do not speak out even when they are forced to move out of their neighborhoods. When will they be willing to speak up? What will it take?

There is something odd about a culture that claims to be against everything Hitler was for, but dares not or cannot defend their own culture.

The Jews who survived Auschwitz have no problem with saying that they want to retain a state composed of their own people. Should we also need to allow ourselves to be partially obliterated before we find it morally acceptable to fight tooth and nail to retain a territory we can call our own?

It is often said that Israel and Europe are in the same boat, in the sense that both are the subject of Islam expansionism. But the difference is that Israel understands perfectly what is happening. “Israel is us” is the name of a book by Fiamma Nirenstein. I wish , I have to add.




As a Norwegian who has lived in Hong Kong and China for the last 21 years, I know what it’s like to be an immigrant (I call myself a climatic refugee, having escaped the cold and dark of Norway to revel in the much more pleasant South China weather) living among strangers. Here, I act like the normal foreigners who have settled in Norway: I have learnt the local language, cook and eat mostly Chinese food and I celebrate the local holidays.
What I haven’t done is demand that everyone in Hong Kong becomes Norwegian.
And that is the crux of the matter: Muslims, wherever they settle, will eventually demand that the local population become, if not exactly Muslim, so at least ‘Sharia compliant.’
So why the hell don’t the Norwegians say “OK, enough of this, we don’t want to be like you and if you don’t want to be like us, go and live in Saudi Arabia or Iran, those paradises for the right-thinking ummah”?
I think it’s for the same reason as many older Chinese, having lived through the ravages of extreme Communism and seen at close hand what that evil ideology leads to, can’t bring themselves to say a bad word about the Communist party. They keep bleating on about how Mao was misled by evil people, how Communism is great really, it’s just been hijacked by some misunderstanders of the faith.
When I grew up in the 70’s, America was the big evil. Palestine was good, Israel bad. The radicals from the 70’s are now the people running Norway. No matter how much mayhem Muslims create in my country, my contemporaries can’t bring themselves to admit that their youthful views were in fact wrong. Perhaps they think holding on to their teenage beliefs will keep them young. Meanwhile their children have grown up in an atmosphere where all war is bad, patriotism is bad and equated with fascism, and all points of view are of equal value.
Saying that we must stop the whole-sale immigration from Muslim countries is fascist, everybody in the world has as much right to live in Norway as those who were born there because, oh, we must compensate for British imperialism or something, and to say that immigrants must adhere to Norwegian laws and customs makes us somehow like Hitler.
Norwegians have been living in a pacifistic haze since WWII, and anyone who even mentions that the people who want to turn Norway into a Muslim vassal state should be stopped, must be a racist, fascist warmonger.
The author of the above article, Christian Skaug, is wrong, however, saying that Norwegians don’t even discuss these things in private. They do … at least one-on-one. But it is hushed. Because the youth from the 70’s are now running the newspapers, the schools and the government. They still think Palestine is the ultimate cool, and that Israel should be obliterated.
I despair for my country.

10 Responses

  1. This article fills me with a sense of sadness. Will Norwegians and other European peoples never awaken to this unfolding self-made tragedy and recognise it for the evil that it is? Here in England, I look at the youngest members of my family and I fear for their future when they too, if our people do not awaken, will be in an ethnic minority in their own homeland. What will happen to them? What sort of degraded lives will they be compelled to lead? How will this effect them psychologically? One of their parents alas, is heavily infected with the PC anti-white virus, thus I am concerned that they will internalise at least a degree of racial and ethnic self-hatred.

    If we cannot reverse this process soon, we must ultimately seek to secede and create separate ethno-states in which to preserve our peoples. The Eastern Europeans appear to be least infected with the PC virus, and I can readily foresee a time, if the present trends continue, when I shall have to seek asylum in one of the Slavic countries.

    Only yesterday, a signficant article by Fjordman was posted at the Gates of Vienna blog which touches upon this very theme:

  2. Perhaps, one day the natives of Northwest Europe will knock on the door to Greater Israel?
    Boundaries of the Promised Land According to the Bible.
    The Land of Israel stretches from the western confluences of the Nile Delta, encompasses all Sinai, part of Northern Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, parts of Iraq, southeast Turkey, the island of Cyprus, and reaches along the Euphrates River and beyond.

  3. The profound problem of Muslim immigration

    The subversion against our societies is executed by relatively few immigrants. Most immigrants from Islamic countries do not come to the West in order tor transform free Western countries into semblances of the autocracies or theocracies they have fled from. They seek better living conditions, employment, a better future – but they do so without the intention to change their religion, and this is where things get complicated.

    Retaining faith in Islam and Islamic scholars will lead the immigrants to tacitly support the subversive aims of Islamists who have also come to the West, initially as a relatively small fraction of millions of Islamic immigrants. These Islamic leaders and scholars use the Islamic teachings to destroy confidence in Western democracies, and they are astonishingly effective in achieving that aim.

    Explaining how this seemingly irrational development can take place requires some history. This first and foremost means the life and conduct of Muhammad, the perfect example for the pious Muslim even today. The authority of Muhammad is absolute in Islam, be it in form of Quranic commands or the examples of conduct recorded in hadith collections, known in Islam as the ‘Sunna’. Hijra, immigration, was a key element in Muhammads takeover of Yathrib, today known as Medina.

    Unfortunately, the concept of Hijra is not limited in time or space to 7th century Arabia. The command as given is absolute, and remains an obligation on Muslims. One of many hadith quotes Muhammad for this:

    I charge you with five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage Jihad for the sake of Allah.

    Thus, immigration is step four out of a five step plan. Sam Solomon elaborates:

    So Hijra or migration is binding on all Muslims for numerous reasons; the most important being that migration is preparatory to jihad with an aim and objective of securing victory for Islam and Muslims either in another country or generally as a community.

  4. The Temple Mount, 2005: “Oslo will be Medina”

    “A senior party activist in Jerusalem, Sheikh Issam Amira, expressed this philosophy in a recent speech which he made on the Temple Mount:

    “Listeners! The Moslems in Denmark make up three percent [of the population], yet constitute a threat to the future of the Danish kingdom. It’s no surprise that in Bitrab (the ancient name of Medina, a city in Arabia to which Mohammed immigrated) they were fewer than three percent of the general population, but succeeded changing the regime in Bitrab.

    “It’s no surprise that our brothers in Denmark have succeeded in bringing Islam to every home in that country. Allah will grant us victory in their land to establish the [Islamic] revolution in Denmark.”

    After Denmark, the Sheikh said, the party will carry the revolution to Oslo and change its name to Medina.”

  5. – Decapitate those who don’t follow Ramadan!

    Imam and private school founder in Oslo, Syed Farasat Ali Bukhari, is firm on his opinion about how to treat those who don’t pay full attention to islam in their daily life. He demands decapitation for those who will not follow Ramadan – in Norway, it was revealed in the daily news Wednesday night, on Dagsrevyen, on state TV, NRK.

    Human Rights representative, Hege Storhaug, explains to the journalist that this is nothing new to her. This is the mainstream islam being preached in the mosques everywhere, she states. Based on her in depth knowledge about islam, she is often being attacked verbally as being “racist”.

    Some time back, Storhaug found herself in a pool of blood after an attack in her own home. Prior to this incident she could see “no racists in our neighborhood”-style messages written over posters with her photo on lampposts, in her neighborhood.

    The Education Minister in this news clip, Kristin Halvorsen, was not aware of these Bukhari teachings , and it is most likely that the application would have been approved had it not been for today’s revelations. Nothing of his teachings were in any way visible on the application for a private school for 200 pupils in Oslo, at Ammerud, which furthermore, is the same area as mentioned above, in connection with ethnic cleansing in the capital of Norway.

    This is, by the way, the same Kristin Halvorsen as the previous Finance Minister, who was seen in an antisemitic demonstration in Oslo some time back.

    Youtube video clips exist on Bukhari’s earlier preachings, in Urdu revealing his views on how to deal with those who won’t pray five times a day, or follow Ramadan. Human Rights had had some of these translated to state what he was really saying,

    “State approved extremism?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.