/

/

/

/

/

TUNDRA TABLOIDS GETS MAIL ABOUT ROBERT SPENCER LECTURE IN WISCONSIN…….

TUNDRA TABLOIDS GETS MAIL ABOUT ROBERT SPENCER LECTURE IN WISCONSIN…….

By KGS14 years agoLeave a comment

Smokin!

An anonymous reader of the Tundra Tabloids left the following comment concerning a TT post from last year, about Robert Spencer’s lecture at the Univeristy of Wisconsin. The commenter is upset that the TT referred to the intolerant followers of Mo at the lecture as “intolerant followers of Mo”. To come to think of it, the TT should have worded it in the following way: “The intolerant worshippers and followers of madman prophet of Islam, Mo”.

“followers of Mo?” You are idiots and your site is as ridiculous as you are. Were you even there? probably not. Spencer was the only unruly person present-Jumping up and down like a child who wants attention. And the only reason why this post has no comments is because you screen them all before you approve them. If you had any balls, you would post them freely.”

Heh. The comment section at the TT is a privilege, not a right, and due to racists, bigots, spambots and trolls the TT monitors all comments. If ya don’t like it….no one is obligated to read these pages. Sometimes a comment speaks more about the person leaving it, than about the comment’s intended target, so that’s why some comments are worth republishing, like for example, the above comment.

1.) In spite of their denial, Mohamed is worshipped by Muslims, which makes the followers of Mo according to their own defintion of the word, idolaters.

2.) Robert Spencer, as both scholar and lecturer, always presents himself in a professional manner, having seen dozens of videos of his speeches and lectures, it’s a fact that I can attest to. The TT has also met and dined with Spencer (in Brussles) and can also attest to his being a gentleman in private as well.

3.) The only person jumping around like a child wanting attention, is this commenter, as many will now notice, slinging charges about someone without a scintilla of evidence. The TT doubts seriously that the commenter was even at the lecture, but that’s a point neither the TT nor the commenter can prove.

4.) Anyone daring to say that the TT “has no balls”, while doing so without a handle or name,…is the one without any balls. Nuff said.

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.