Anti-Israel bigotry and bias Anti-Semitism in the Netherlands Blood libels

DUTCH FILM MAKER SPREADS BLOOD LIBEL ABOUT ARIEL SHARON…….

What should one say to a person who’s stoops so low as to blood libel a man bed ridden in coma unable to defend himself? What indeed should one say to him, or her if the case may be if you came face to face? The TT’s advise is to say nothing, just pop him in the mouth with a good right hook. KGS

NOTE: No doubt the man holds warm thoughts about stinky Arafat.

‘I saw Ariel Sharon murder 2 Palestinian toddlers in Lebanon’

Israel officials call report by Dutch director George Sluizer a ‘modern blood libel’ after he director claimed to have seen then Defense Minster shooting children from close range near the Sabra-Shatilla refugee camp in 1982.

Dutch media this month published articles accusing Ariel Sharon of murdering Palestinian children in Lebanon. Former officials who worked with Sharon said the publications were false. The Israeli foreign ministry called the claim “a modern blood libel.”

[….]

Sluizer repeated the accusation in an interview for Vrij Nederland, an intellectual magazine, published on November 13 ahead of a screening of his film at the prestigious International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam. “Sharon shot two children like you shoot rabbits, in front of my eyes,” he said.

[…]

Sharon’s successor as defense minister, Moshe Arens, said Sluizer’s account was “a lie.” According to Arens, “Sharon would never shoot a child and he was not in Lebanon in November of 1982. Thirdly, protocol prohibits ministers from wearing weapons. As civilians they are not allowed to carry firearms.”
Amram Mitzna, former chairman of the Israeli Labor Party who served under Sharon as head of the Syrian front during the First Lebanon War, called Sluizer’s account “total nonsense.” Mitzna added: “I attacked Sharon politically over his decisions, but Sharon would never do a thing like that. It’s completely ridiculous.”

Yossef Levy, senior spokesperson for the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, called Sluizer’s account a “crude and disgraceful lie. It is hard to believe that any reasonable person would take seriously this kind of modern blood libel, which is not supported by a single shred of evidence.”

More here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *