SARKO’S NEW ‘REPUBLICAN’ PARTY HOSTS RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE DEBATE, MUSLIMS A NO SHOW……..

Doomed from the start, there can be no private corner for a public square ideology.

Islam is always here to dominate, not to be rendered as being just ”one of the many” religious systems in society. There is no ”Golden Rule” philosophy for the desert creed, it’s ”do onto others as Mohamed sees fit”, and that means subjugating the populace onto Islamic norms, no matter how long that takes.

NOTE: That Muslim groups boycotted the event speaks volumes, they couldn’t get a wedge in so the flat out rejected to attend. There unwillingness not to attend the event has nothing to do with ‘stigmatizing Muslims, and everything to do with be exposed for what and who they are.

Sarko’s ‘Islam in France’ meeting kicks off storm

Leader of “The Republicans” Nicolas Sarkozy. Photo: AFP

Published: 04 Jun 2015 14:57 GMT+02:00

Nicolas Sarkozy’s right-wing opposition party held an internal meeting on Thursday on the “question of Islam” in France, boycotted by Muslim groups who warned of “stigmatising” the religion.

The former French president’s right-wing party, recently rebranded “The Republicans”, will debate “the place of religion” in secular France and more specifically “Islam in France.”

One month after the January’s attacks in Paris that killed 17, Sarkozy said: “The question is not to know what the Republic can do for Islam, but what Islam can do to become the Islam of France.”

France is home to Europe’s largest Muslim community and also the continent’s biggest Jewish community but is officially secular.

Sarkozy insisted on the eve of the closed-doors meeting that “one shouldn’t run away from debates.”

“A country is like a family. You have to talk, you have to work things through,” he said.

But Muslim groups said they would not be present at the meeting.

“We can’t participate in an initiative like this that stigmatises Muslims,” said Abdallah Zekri from the French Muslim Council (CFCM).

More here.

NOTE II:

The party’s vice-president Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, criticised the fact that the new party’s first action was to debate Islam — a “bad idea”, she said. But the organiser of the meeting, MP Henri Guaino, hit back at the “ostriches” in the party, burying their heads in the sand over the issue of Islam in France.

Written by KGS

4 Responses

By sheik yer'mami Jun 05, 2015

Sarkozy said: “The question is not to know what the Republic can do for Islam, but what Islam can do to become the Islam of France.”

The ignorance is astounding. Does he really not know what the mission, the purpose of Islam in the world is? There never was, and there never will be, an Islam of France, or of Italy or Germany or any European nation state. Islam is Islam and that’s it. Erdogan is not the only headbanger who said that. That’s what a billion Muslims believe. France is history if her politicians have nothing more intelligent than this Sarkozy or Le Pen.
1. By KGS Jun 05, 2015
  
  In full agreement Sheik, as the country circles the drain the plumbers are using bandaids to hide the cracks.
2. By No Fear Jun 06, 2015
  
  I like Churchill’s attitude to Islam. He knew what it was designed to do. And he didn’t like it.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Sarko’s ‘Islam in France’ meeting kicks off storm

Share this:

Written by KGS

4 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply