/

/

/

/

/

MOST CZECH MEP’S DISAGREE WITH REFUGEE QUOTAS TO BE DECIDED BY BRUSSELS…….

MOST CZECH MEP’S DISAGREE WITH REFUGEE QUOTAS TO BE DECIDED BY BRUSSELS…….

By KGS9 years agoLeave a comment

The history of the Warsaw Pact firmly embedded in their minds.

I guess he has an issue with the centralization of concentrated power, which ends up sucking sovereignty from member states, rendering them mere neutered appendages of Brussels.

Most Czech MEPs disagree with refugee quotas

Category: EU News Published: 20 May 2015 Written by Czech News Agency

An asylum seekers holds a paper boat, with words written in Italian that read, "Too many deaths, it is not good," during a demonstration in front of the Italian parliament in Rome April 23. Rights group Amnesty urged European leaders to launch a humanitarian operation to end the "spiraling tragedy" of the Mediterranean migrant shipwrecks on the eve of an emergency Brussels summit.

There is a concern that the European Union is interfering in member states’ sovereignty

Strasbourg, France, May 20 (ČTK) — Most Czech MEPs addressed by the Czech News Agency disagree with the European Commission’s (EC) plan to introduce a quota system to spread applicants for refugee status more evenly across the EU member states that the EC will discuss today.

The MEPs have a problem with the measure, aimed to relieve the pressure on Italy and Greece where most migrants arrive, that is being ordered by Brussels, and they say it has divided the European Union.

The MEPs also say the proposal has diverted the discussion on the migration crisis to other issues.

However, some Czech MEPs praise the proposal, saying it is comprehensive and that not only quotas are involved in it.

“We are of the view that it is not at all an effective solution. First, the introduction of mandatory quotas will clearly divert the discussion from dealing with a number of other legislative measures. As a result, we have a rather absurd debate on the theme of quotas, while we are unable to deal with the issue comprehensively,” Pavel Telička (ANO) said.

He said it is undignified “to bargain about people entitled to refugee status as if they were a commodity” and that he has objections to the way in which the proposal is taking shape.

Telička said MEP Petr Ježek, also an ANO member, was in Malta last week. He talked about the problem with representatives from NGOs there who said the proposed solution leads nowhere.

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.