Christian anti-Semitism JEWISH HERITAGE Jewish Law vs. Islamic Law Kosher ritual slaughter Manfred Gerstenfeld



Regular readers of this blog fully understand my opposition to Islamization of the West, and that position is entirely non-negotiable. That said, I also adhere to conservative principles that underpin the freedoms of the individual from the oppression of the state. To pursue in their private lives that which is in accordance to their religious beliefs, and most importantly, that which does not influence the lives of individuals not a part of that community of believers.

Circumcision of an 8 day old male child does not influence my personal life one way or the other, it’s a matter of private personal belief. Ritual animal slaughter done by kosher methods, does not influence my life one way or the other as well. Ritual slaughter of animals done in accordance to Islamic beliefs however, do influence my life, as the proceeds from halal meat industry are sent to various ”Islamic charities” that have been proven to fund the jihad against the West.

Judaism is not a proselytizing religion, it’s adherents do not seek to bring entire non-Jewish communities in which they live, under Jewish law, let alone the whole world, nor does it separate the world into two halves, the house of Judaism and the house of war, Islam does however. So whatever the outside resemblances are between Judaism and knock off Islam, one (Judaism) is entirely benign to society, the other (Islam) is entirely hostile. Those facts must be included in any debate about ritual animal slaughter.

NOTE: A wise friend of mine once said, ”my birth was more traumatic than my circumcision, and I remember neither”, and I agree with him 100%. A Muslim male child reaching the age of puberty and undergoing circumcision, wouldn’t be able to say the same.

What’s hiding behind attacks on circumcision?

10/22/2013 22:55

The climate of hatred is widespread in Europe, anti-Jewish and anti-Israel laws are pushed through far more easily than in many places.

Baby undergoes circumcision

Baby undergoes circumcision Photo: REUTERS

JPost Defending Judaism against attacks on Jewish rituals is gradually becoming a ritual in itself.

A recent recommendation by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) to prohibit circumcision has put Israel and European Jewry on the defensive once again. The Knesset Committee for Aliyah convened an urgent meeting, in which Israeli and international Jewish organizations also participated, on how to nullify this resolution.

The pattern for these defensive reactions was laid last year after a German court in Cologne ruled that circumcision was illegal in its jurisdiction. The same Knesset committee then held an urgent meeting in July 2012. Afterwards, a major effort was made by Israel and Jewish organizations to combat the decision. In December a law was adopted in Germany stating that circumcision would remain legal.

Earlier, a similar fight was waged by Jewish organizations worldwide against anti-ritual slaughter legislation in the Netherlands. The proposed law, which had been accepted by the Lower Chamber, did not pass the Senate in June 2012.

Attacks on Jewish rituals in Europe are likely to be repeated in the future. Israel and Jews are regularly surprised by them. People ask, “why didn’t we know this before?” or “why didn’t we do our utmost to prevent it, rather than react to it?” The answer in the current case is that the issue wasn’t on the agenda – the motion was inserted by German socialist parliamentarian Marlene Rupprecht at the last minute into a debate on the protection of children.

Questions are again being raised regarding what the Knesset, the Israeli Foreign Office and chief rabbis, as well as Jewish organizations abroad, including in the US, can do.

Another question is whether the attack should be fought on the basis of freedom of religion, or should other considerations be introduced? In the case of male circumcision, there are a variety of reports on the health benefits of the practise. This may serve as a good argument in debates, yet it distracts from the truth. Jews perform male circumcision because it is one of the core commandments of the Jewish religion, not out of health considerations.

Yet another recurring aspect of reactions to the attacks on rituals is with whom should Jews collaborate? Muslims are also affected by attempts to prohibit ritual slaughter and circumcision. Co-operation with them, however, entails political issues. While Israel is an observer at the Council of Europe, Turkey is a member. Considering the tense relationship between the two, would the latter want possible collaboration to be exposed? Furthermore, there are many more Muslims than Jews in Europe. Their electoral weight in most countries is much larger.

There are, however, basic differences in timing and procedure between the two religions. Jews circumcise on the eighth day, while Muslims may do so during puberty.

While Jewish circumcisers are trained, this is not always the case with Muslims, and they also often let doctors perform the operation.

Current efforts may find a way to make the PACE resolution harmless by inserting an amendment into it.

However, the same threat is likely to emerge in other countries. In Norway, for example, the opposition Center Party promotes prohibiting circumcision. The True Finns, the third largest party in Finland, which is in the opposition, supports prohibiting circumcision as well.

Beyond fighting to protect Jewish rituals, there is a second dimension, which raises questions of a different nature. Were all PACE supporters of the anti-circumcision motion motivated solely by child welfare? Was what transpired merely a collision between two universal democratic values – the other being freedom of religion? One should not be naïve: there is a major, ongoing battle against religion as Europe moves toward secularization.

There is also a strong desire in some political circles to make life uncomfortable for Muslims.

Problems for Jews affected by these anti-Muslim actions are often considered collateral damage. Yet this means that anti-Semitism plays a role in the attacks on circumcision.

Jews and Israel should also take a third major dimension of the issue into consideration. Anti-Semitism in its anti-Israel form has reached major heights in Europe. At least 150 million out of 400 million Europeans aged 16 years and older believe that Israel is conducting a genocidal war against the Palestinians, or behaves toward them like the Nazis did toward the Jews.

In this context, connections between attacks on Jewish rituals and various anti-Israel measures emerge. The European Union greatly distorts international law when it comes to Israel. This has been exposed in a recent letter to Catherine Ashton, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, signed by more than a thousand jurists from many countries.

Now that the climate of hatred is widespread in Europe, anti-Jewish and anti-Israel laws are pushed through far more easily in many places. Battling attacks on Jewish rituals without confronting the root problem head-on is a highly mistaken policy for the Israeli government to pursue.

The author is emeritus chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

One Response

  1. Why should this resolution be anything other than what it seems, a step forward in human rights? People of all sexes (and the resolution is about females and intersexed as well as male) should not have healthy parts cut off their genitals until they are old enough to give adult informed consent. As Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.