GERMAN HISTORIAN ACKNOWLEDGES SHARIA AS A TOTALITARIAN THREAT AND ISLAM A SOCIETY OF SLAVE HOLDERS……..

It’s what we in the Counterjihad have known all along!

I take exception to the label of ”right-wing” in this context, but the basic premise of the German historian is sound, that sharia is an extremist totalitarian threat. That Islamic ideology has more in common with traditional socialist strong arm values, then it ever will with classic liberalism. The conventional right-left political spectrum does not accurately define these ideologies.

Marxism was a ”conservative” (classical sense, pre-dating the industrial revolution) reactionary movement, that was founded to oppose up-start capitalism. Many of the ruling aristocracy at the time, sympathized with Marxist theory, sharing a loathing for both the free market and it’s supporters.

NOTE: If it’s totalitarian, it’s left-wing (present), regardless of whether there are religious elements involved.

H/T: Vlad

Historian Egon Flaig: Sharia is the most dangerous right-wing extremism in the world

Posted on June 30, 2012 by Eeyore

From Focus.De

Many thanks for the translation by Hermes:

Münich. The ancient historian Egon Flaig has argued against the declarations coming from officials of muslim groups that Islam belongs to the history of Europe. In a comment made for the news magazine Focus, Flaig disagreed amongst others with the representatives of Kenan Kolat, a turkish community in Germany. According to the professor teaching at the University of Rostock, associations with special interests could be maintaining a cultural rememberance devoid of real historical basis. The real basis would be that the penetration of theocracy into politics in the islamic world left not even the smallest place for the kind of republican communities characterizing Europe. “Where have there been self-governing citizenry under islamic rule? Where have there been decreeing people’s assembly or parliaments? We find nowhere regular elections, referendums, national constitutions, or a town hall” Flaig writes in “Focus”

“Nowadays there are islamic movements who do not follow sharia, and there is the powerful sharia-complying islam. The difference is fundamental for the chances regarding democracy and human rights. Just as nationalsocialism divided people into superior and inferior men following racist parameters, so has sharia developed a religious apartheid-system. The long-term goal of sharia is to spread this system to the entire world. The sharia-complying Islam can surely be called islamofascism, and the most dangerous right wing radicalism in the world”, Flaig says. This islam has never belonged to Europe. In fact, the european culture was in the position of being able to thrive because it held steady for more than 1000 years against the continuous attacks of the muslim sultanate and the emirate. Only an islam complying with the constitution could be a part of our country.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By DP111 Jul 01, 2012

Amsterdam Gets a Harsh Lesson in Islam 101

https://frontpagemag.com/2012/06/29/amsterdam-gets-a-harsh-lesson-in-islam-101/

In June 2011, Geert Wlders was prosecuted for simply making a film “Fitrna”, and Islam’s totalitarian ideology. And yet when an imam publicy tells the same, quoting chapter and verse from the koran, the Dutch authorities excused it on the basis of freedom of expression.

These are the kind of double standards practised by the fascist left both in Britain and Holland: Ignore the evils preached by Islamists but prosecute the non Muslims who reveal them. The totalitarian Left unites with Islam in their objective to destroy the culture and traditions of Britain and Europe. Their first objective is Christianity, on whose pillars much of Western civilisation rests.
By joy52 Jul 01, 2012

More should speak out.

Leave a Reply to joy52 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.