Jussi Halla-aho

FINNISH SUPREME COURT OVER RULES LOWER COURT AND CONVICTS HALLA-AHO OF RACISM AND DEFAMING ISLAM…….

 

The YLE reports are typically infantile and false. Never mind the fact that Jussi Halla-aho never stated the things he was convicted of (the court twisted them out of context, as I have amply proven in prior posts) the state broadcaster continues to try and set these falsified memes into cement.

Halla-aho merely pointed out the inconsistencies of existing Finnish law, that allows for ethnic Finns to be besmirched as for an example, genetically predisposed to alcoholism and and wife beating, but protects minorities from similar jabs. Jussi is a hero, and deserves a medal for putting up with the mental midgets in the prosecutors office. The justice system here in Finland is warped.

NOTE: I’m in complete disagreement with The Finns party leader, Timo Soini, who in a statement defending Halla-aho, nonetheless called the verdict “just”. It was an attempt to show deference to the land’s justice system but he needn’t have, a corrupt justice system  is corrupt justice system, even when fried in butter.

Supreme Court orders Halla-aho to pay for hate speech

Finland’s Supreme Court has ordered controversial Finns Party MP Jussi Halla-aho to pay a fine for his anti-Islamic blog posts dating back to 2008. He is also to delete certain writings from his blog.

Finland’s highest court ordered Halla-aho to pay 50 day fines, instead of 30 levied by a lower court, for statements about Somali immigrants.Two lower courts previously dismissed hate charges against Halla-aho and only fined him for defaming religion.The Supreme Court said Halla-aho’s posts, which likened Islam to pedophilia and said Somalis are predisposed to stealing and living off welfare, qualified as inciting hatred against an ethnic group. In its ruling, the judiciary said hate speech does not fall under the protection afforded by the freedom of speech.Halla-aho chairs Parliament’s Administration committee, which deals with immigration issues.

Sources Yle

Related items

Soini: No action on Halla-aho court ruling

Soini said after following the Halla-aho case for the past four years he had changed his view, and no longer felt that a conviction for racism should prevent anyone from serving in the party’s parliamentary group. 8.6.

Finns Party chair Timo Soini has said he does not intend to take any action following the ruling handed down by the Supreme Court.

“Halla-aho and the Finns Party will have to live with this ruling, although Halla-aho was not an MP at the time that he wrote the statements,” Soini said.

“I think the ruling was just and I won’t take the matter any further,” he added, noting that Halla-aho had been subjected to merciless publicity as a result of the case.

The Finns Party chair said that Halla-aho’s fate as chair of Parliament’s Administration Committee (which has responsibility for immigration) rests with committee members and other members of the house. Soini noted that other parliamentary group would have to take the initiative on removing Halla-aho.

More here.

Finns Party MP mulls appeal against hate speech verdict

In a post on his Facebook page, Halla-aho signaled he would appeal the latest verdict in the European Court of Human Rights. 8.6.

Supreme Court orders Halla-aho to pay for hate speech

Finland’s Supreme Court has ordered controversial Finns Party MP Jussi Halla-aho to pay a fine for his anti-Islamic blog posts dating back to 2008. He is also to delete certain writings from his blog. 8.6.

More here.

7 Responses

  1. Welcome to the brave new Finland, where telling the truth is now a criminal offense.

    Sad to see what has happened to the nation that once stopped the Red Army dead in its tracks. If the clowns who run Finland now had been around in 1939, they’d probably thank the Soviets for the wonderful lesson in multicultural outreach.

  2. I don’t live in Finland so I’ll say it,
    Those Judges should be investigated for treason. Finland for the Finnish.
    The “clowns” running Finland just like the “clowns” running every other western nation have been been systematically destroying our nations with uncontrolled unassimiliable immigration without ever gaining our consent and now they have got the balls to criminalise anyone discussing the problems they caused in the first place.
    Who the hell do they think they are!

    1. They consider themselves to be the enlightened ones and that they have a duty to educate the masses for their own good.

      We need to be protected from ourselves by these self-proclaimed superior beings who in my country at least dress up like Santa Claus and make perfect fools of themselves in the process.

      They embark on ventures of judicial activism because they (the soi-disants) are after all, the superior ones.

  3. @Mathias – exactly. He is guilty of making observations and imparting the nature of the observations. How is it inciting hatred? Another question – exactly when does an ideology/belief system become allowed to be defamed?
    Are people allowed to defame Nazism or Communism – despite that some minorities currently hold those beliefs?

    Who decides for everyone else` when an ideology can be exposed and questioned and defamed if needs be ?

  4. @@Mathias – exactly. He is guilty of making observations and imparting the nature of the observations. How is it inciting hatred? Another question – exactly when does an ideology/belief system become allowed to be defamed?
    Are people allowed to defame Nazism or Communism – despite that some minorities currently hold those beliefs?

    Who decides for everyone else` when an ideology can be exposed and questioned and defamed if needs be ?

  5. He should appeal. He should refuse to pay any eventual fine, and he should be willing to go to jail and let his cause be a rallying cry.

Leave a Reply to raymond Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.