Anti-sharia Sharia


How dare people concerned with the US Constitution being usurped by foreign laws dare raise their voice over political Islam. That’s about the size of it folks, so get used to seeing more of these screaming mustard alerts as the true believers raise a ruckus over their scam being exposed to the light of day. KGS

NOTE: Perhaps star researcher/analyst Toby Archer will come to their rescue with a gob-stopping report on the joys of sharia and how waycist it is not wanting to be Islamized. No doubt he and the loon Johan Bäckman can join forces.

H/T: Sheik Yer’Mami

Muslims denounce bill to ban ‘foreign laws’

Community leaders call state rep’s plan divisive, unnecessary

Oralandar Brand-Williams/ The Detroit News

Detroit —Opposition is mounting among Muslims against pending legislation that would ban Michigan courts from considering “foreign laws” — including Sharia, or Islamic law.

Muslim and community leaders gathered Tuesday in Midtown to denounce legislation from state Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, as divisive, unnecessary and mean-spirited.

“This plan goes against our country’s core values of accepting people from all races and walks of life,” said state Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, who is Muslim. “We simply cannot move forward with this plan.

“It’s racism at its core.”

Similar measures are under consideration in 25 other state legislatures, and supporters say the protections are needed. The Michigan bill doesn’t mention Sharia, but watchdog groups say they’ve identified 50 cases nationwide that could be influenced by the religious rules. Most involved divorce or child custody.

Another sponsor of the Michigan bill, Rep. Martin Knollenberg, R-Troy, said the legislation is necessary because “we shouldn’t allow other laws to usurp the state constitution.”

He scoffed at critics who called the bill racist: “Where does it say (in the bill) it’s anti-Muslim?”

Agema last week called the accusations of bigotry “hogwash.”

From The Detroit News:

4 Responses

  1. I for one could give a crap what these Sharia Law proponents think, there is only one set of laws for the USA , it’s the Constitution, and it’s Amendments, all state, county, and local laws are derived from it. If these practitioners of ‘The Religion Of Peace’ want to live under a religious dictatorship may I suggest they migrate ASAP to the ‘Islamic Paradise’ of their choice. Once living under Sharia Law, which BTW is often changed at the whim of the Imams and enforced rather harshly by the ‘religious police’, they won’t have to put up with the Western Civilizations’ personal freedom, liberty,economic opportunity, and the things that really bother their psyche and philosophy like due process, Habeas Corpus, and equal protection under the law. IMHO these folks want it both ways all of the benefits of a free society while hanging on to their 7th century political/religious system.

  2. islam is a RELIGION, not a race, everybody is equal to the law, impossible to be equal to 2 different laws, 2 different law systems, how would it be if a muslim kills a non-muslim as honor crime since it’s right in islam? how would it be if a muslim rapes a non-muslim woman as it’s right in islam? would a muslim have his hand cut and we’d have to support him who became uncapable to work? would we be forbiden to criticize islam as sharia forbids it? there is no way to 2 law states co-exist in a country, and muslims already have too many rights according to sharia in west

    1. I agree. Pres. Lincoln said it all ” a house divided against itself cannot stand”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.