WE GOT MAIL: ORGANIZER OF SHARIA INFO SEMINAR IN TENNESSEE U.S.A. INVITES THE TT TO ARGUE AGAINST SHARIA…….

Last week the Tundra Tabloids reported on a “sharia info seminar” that took place in the state of Tennesse, as a reaction to some proposed legislation being mulled over to make it against the law for sharia to be introduced as an alternative form of jurisprudence within that state. The organizer of that event, William Coley, a convert to Islam, dared the TT to come and prove him wrong.

SMOKING!

William Coley says:
29/03/2011 at 03:49
If you or your readers feel that anything untrue is being said at these events then i would like to PERSONALLY invite you to come and challenge the info in person…..William Coley organizer of sharia lectures.

Well the Tundra Tabloids would love to debate the dawa spreader, but doubts that William Colely would want to foot the bill to fly the TT all the way from Helsinki to Knoxville Tennesse.

I suggest that he invites Robert Spencer to his event to debate the supposed “wonderful attributes of sharia” and how such an anti-Western medieval form of jurisprudence is not in conflict with the US Constitution.

As Robert Spencer notes: “Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, whom John Esposito classes as a “reformist,” says that “the Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including “the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-`ashriyyah, Al-Ja`fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”

So I ask you William Coley, do you dispute Sheik Qaradawi’s contention about the schools of Islamic jurisprudence? As with the writings of Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler, to truly know and understand the Koran, hadiths and sharia, is to despise them.

So invite Robert Spencer to your event to debate sharia with you, and remember to bring the video cameras and good lighting, I wouldn’t want to miss that one,all the way from far away Finland. KGS

Once more: Sam Solomon on the Michael Coren Show courtesy of Vlad Tepes

Written by KGS

3 Responses

By Big Frank Mar 30, 2011

If these so-called devout practitioners of ‘The Religion Of Peace’ want to live under Sharia Law I suggest that they vacate the USA and migrate to one of those Islamic paradises (in reality a religious concentration camp) where they can live out their 7th century fantasy, devoid of personal freedom, liberty, modernity, and social and economic opportunity. A place where the rules change at the whim of the Imams and are brutally enforced by the ‘religious police’, BTW don’t bother to look for habeas corpus or due process in the Islamic world.
By William Coley Sep 05, 2011

So good news loons, you get to hear me debate shariah with spencer just as you had hoped . hope you are happy with the results.
1. By KGS Sep 05, 2011
  
  Thanks, will put up the video of it as soon as it appears. The more Islam is exposed to the light, the more people are revolted of its core theme and purposes. Thanks for taking the bait.

Leave a Reply to KGS Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

SMOKING!

Share this:

Written by KGS

3 Responses

Leave a Reply to KGS Cancel reply