Bosnia Radovan Karadzic War Crimes


The trial of Radovan Karadzic is hopefully going to reveal many of the things done by all sides of the conflict in the Bosnian war. The Bosnian Muslim PR machine effectively welded its propaganda into the conscience of the international community thereby setting the stage for the demonization of the Serbian people. The Tundra Tabloids is not saying atrocities were not committed by the Serbs, but that until now, the extent to which the Muslims played in the those atrocities has been grossly under reported, until now.

Karadzic: Lets see just how deep
that rabbit hole goes

The UN worker (1993-95) effectively undermines his own testimony that he didn’t believe that the Muslims would have staged the two bombings at the Sarajevo Markale market place, by admitting earlier that the Bosnian Muslim forces would allow “the presence of civilians on battlefield (dead) would shock the public and force NATO to intervene.”

Read on. KGS

Muslims ‘wanted to provoke foreign intervention’

The Hague, 7 May (AKI) – A prosecution witness at the trial of wartime Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic on Friday blamed Bosnian Serb forces for indiscriminately shelling the capital, Sarajevo, during the 1992-1995 war.
The witness, David Harland, who worked for UN mission in Sarajevo (UNPROFOR) from 1993-1995, accused Serb forces of carrying out “widespread and coordinated” ethnic cleansing of non-Serbs from the territories they controlled.
Karadzic has been charged by the Hague-based UN war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia on two counts of genocide and nine counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by forces under his command during Bosnian war.
Cross-examined by Karadzic, Harland said Muslim leaders hadn’t allowed civilians to leave besieged Sarajevo, because it would contribute to ethnic cleansing.
Asked by Karadzic whether Muslims were sacrificing their own people to trigger intervention by NATO and western powers, Harland said it was partly true.
“There were people (in Muslim leadership) who believed that NATO would not intervene if the situation wasn’t very grave and that the presence of civilians on battlefield would shock the public and force NATO to intervene,” Harland said.
Asked whether Muslims staged the two bombings at Sarajevo market place Markale, for the same purpose, in which more than 100 people were killed, Harland said it was out of question.
He said weapons were being smuggled into Sarajevo through an underground tunnel and Muslims were firing at Serb positions from the city.
“But Sarajevo was under siege and a great majority of victims were killed by fire from Serb positions,” Harland said.
“The Muslim side was blowing out of proportions the suffering of the population, and the Serbian side was minimising it,” Harland said.
Harland was the sixth of 410 prosecution witnesses to be presented at the trial expected to last several years.  Cross-examination of Harland resumes on Monday.

2 Responses

  1. What we saw on the Balkans yesterday, is what is happening in the Middle-East today.

    The triangle drama of Yogoslavia/Serbia, Kosovo, and Albania is very similar to Israel, PA, and Jordan.

    All the NGO:s, Muslims, greens, left and even the right(with NATO) is trying to provoke a foreign intervention on Israel.

    It is not so, that Serbia was a problem and NATO had a solution. It was rather so NATO that had a problem and the Serbia was the answer.
    On the same way Israel is not the problem and the others have an solution, but rather so that the others have a problem(with the Muslims) and Israel/Jews is thought to be the answer(offer).

    In Yogoslavia, UN, Muslims, social democrats, greens and USA with NATO succeeded to launch two or three new Muslim states(Kosovo, FYROM, Bosnia?) in Europe, and even make the previously one, Albania, much stronger.

    In Israel they want to launch one or two new Palestinian(Muslim) States besides those two existing, Gaza and Jordan.

  2. Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot

    Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case
    (The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)

    This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr Karadzic

    and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.




    Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states

    instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as

    with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United

    Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and

    verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at

    the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan

    Karazdic and others.

    I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings

    to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of

    criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable

    topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts

    AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

    Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal

    was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly

    loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we

    contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us

    and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

    ((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative

    from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery

    for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives

    present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate

    topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked!
    The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."

    Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here

    is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally

    legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I attended

    in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international

    criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading

    financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and

    verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain"

    must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially

    acceptable" for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing

    the ICTY and
    ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.

    SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is,

    disgusting morally!

    I represented the state interests' of the Former Yugoslavia, in Darko Trifunovic’s

    absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.

Leave a Reply to Kari Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.