

“In today’s system” the Prophet Muhammad would be considered a “child molester,” apparently referring to his marriage to a six-year-old child. She also said that it is time for Islam to be “thrown back where it came from, behind the Mediterranean.”
The reason for that is all too clear, the man wasn’t shackled by multi-culti/PC nonsense that keeps most people from speaking freely about the obvious. Here is an example of why Winston would most likely be up on charges like Dutch MP, Geert Wilders, or convicted like Susanne Winters and forced to pay a stiff fine. KGS
“How dreadful are the curses which Islam lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
“A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property‹either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
“No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.
“Far from being moribund, Islam is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science -the science against which it had vainly struggled -the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
~~ Sir Winston Churchill~~
You're absolutely correct that Churchill would be castigated by the keepers of correct thinking if he were around today.
However, it seems to be acceptable that an academic institution in the UK capitulates to islamist groups, citing 'security fears', by 'uninviting' a controversial (i.e. anti-islamist) speaker from a campus debate.
//blogs.telegraph.co.uk/damian_thompson/blog/2009/01/23/gutless_lse_bans_islam_critic_douglas_murray_for_security_reasons?com_num=20&com_pg=2
Churchill must be turning in his grave.
and all the men who fought and died in ww2 for the UK.
what a disgusting thought to think that they would have NOW died in vain to see how the countrymen of UK welcoming in open arms these souless bands of medival people who have next to no humanity and who are not connected to anything other than their own selfish will/desires to take over all that is not theirs!!