FINNISH INTERIOR MINISTER LOOKS TO CLOSE ASYLUM SEEKER LOOPHOLES…….

Asylum Asylum policies Finland Finnish Immigration Concerns Finnish Politics

FINNISH INTERIOR MINISTER LOOKS TO CLOSE ASYLUM SEEKER LOOPHOLES…….

Place them on a plane, and say heipa hei.

Räsänen looks to close asylum-seeker loophole

Interior Minister claims a ten-fold increase in individuals managing to avoid deportation because their home countries will only accept voluntary returnees, and suggests paying some failed asylum seekers to leave Finland.

Parliament is currently considering a change to the law in order to try and close a loophole permitting some failed asylum seekers to avoid deportation.

Under current rules, some individuals whose asylum claims have been rejected, including convicted criminals, can stay in Finland if their home country has a policy of only accepting so-called voluntary returnees.

The Interior Ministry says 700 rejected asylum seekers may be eligible for Finnish residence permits because their home countries do not accept forced deportations.

”The number of people in this position in Finland has gone up ten-fold in a year,” the Interior Minister Päivi Räsänen said. “There is also a danger of this trend attracting more people to come here, knowing that they can’t be deported,” Räsänen added.

There has been support among MPs for a proposal to pay failed asylum seekers to return voluntarily to their country, in a move which ministers insist would cost less than allowing the individual to remain in Finland.

More here.

Written by KGS

One Response

By Raymond Sep 28, 2014

What is the motivation underlying the government’s idea that a financial inducement might persuade criminals (and other persons who make no contribution to the general community) to voluntarily return to their country of origin?

Why would any government (by such a policy) deliberately cede power to those who have no power?

Why do so many western governments just roll over in the fetal position moaning that it’s all too hard?

Why, by default, let other governments control your government’s authority to boot out those immigrants who offer nothing of benefit to Finnish society?

Why not just inform the country of origin that a former citizen is being returned and let them deal with any problems that subsequently arise?

The Finns need to get a steel spine and take back control of Finland.

WHy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply Cancel reply