Burkas Niqabs and Burqas UK Dhimmis

UK THINK TANK WONK THINKS 7TH CENTURY ANTI-SOCIAL BAG BELONGS TO MODERN BRITAIN…….

Leave it to a think tank “wonk” to promote bull crap like this, one can only wonder how much this former “faith advisor” to the prior Labour government cost the British taxpayer. Morons like Malik exist off the hard working people, producing absolutely nothing while contributing to the decay of the British state. What nonsense, why do you Brits put up with this crap in the first place, is multiculturalism such a lofty ideal, and the success of it gauged by the number of kebab stands that dot the central street in every town?
Such an article should have every sane Brit pounding on the door of that institution, demanding Malik to be sacked, as well as every numbskull that pushes her stupidity upon elected officals. Every British politician should be made well aware by their constituency that any such notion of Malik’s making its way into public policy, that was considered by them and given their stamp of approval, will have grave consequences for them at the polls.
When it’s all said and done people, you have the power to put an end to all of this nonsense once and for all, just say no. Form yourselves into formidable blocks of voters in your precincts, and make it clear that anyone pulling for Islamization will be drummed out of power, and that you’ll give your vote to teh person that indeed does “get it”. KGS

Alveena Malik: Make sure you tell your
politicians to avoid me and my policies like the plague


Opponents of the veil claim it oppresses women and presents a barrier between those who wear traditional dress and the rest of society.
But in a new report from think-tank Civitas, Alveena Malik, a former faith adviser to the last Labour government, said the test of whether religious symbols are appropriate should be based on whether they are practical.
Politicians in France and Belgium have voted in favour of banning the full veil, or “niqab”, and other European countries are thought to be considering similar action.
In a new report, Women, Islam and Western Liberalism, Mrs Malik said: “We in Britain need to take a different direction from others in Europe and to accept the veil as part of a modern British way of life.”
She continued: “The wearing of religious symbols, including the full veil, should be a fundamental human right of an individual in both the public and private sphere.
“The real test for religious symbols in the public sphere should always be: ‘Does the wearing of a symbol (such as the kirpan, turban, yarmulke, crucifix and the veil) hinder a citizen’s ability to perform their public civic duties?’”

4 Responses

  1. It is disturbing that this woman's 'thoughts' are being published by Civitas, for hitherto it has shown itself to be very critical of multiculturalism and Islamisation. I can only but hope that this publication is an aberration, and that its author will not continue to be sponsored by Civitas.

  2. Call spread in the INTERNET:
    Sexual education without Taboos or Neo-Taboos: the analysis of the sex taboo, (in traditionally monogamous societies), we see that the real purpose of the sex taboo was the social integration of sexually weaker males.

    Nowadays, on one hand many women are looking for men with a bigger sexual competence, specially men from traditionally polygamous societies: in these societies, only the stronger men have children, they choose them and refine the quality of the men.
    On the other hand, nowadays many men from traditionally monogamous societies look for females from other societies, that are economically weakened [soft]…

    CONCLUSION:
    In traditionally polygamous societies is it natural, that only the strongest men have children, NEVERTHELESS the traditionally monogamenen societies must accept their history! That is, these societies can´t treat the sexually weaker males like the trash cans of society! This means, that men (with good health) rejected by females should have the legitimate right to an ARTIFICIAL womb [scientific research priority]…

    P.S.
    WAKE UP: Muslims use a 'trick' to get reach a «demographic advantage»: The suppression of the rights of the women!…

  3. A number of blogs are now forecasting the that the UK will be an Islamic state. How true that is, or is just their great concern for the UK that is the cause of this anxiety, is debatable. What is not debatable is that the political elite of the UK show no anxiety at the continuing speed of Islamisation, and even continue to foster this existential threat.

    In this atmosphere, this article by the Sultan, is well worth reading. It is disquieting.

    2084: The Eyes of the Guardians of Sharia are Upon You

    http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2010/10/2084-eyes-of-guardians-of-sharia-are.html

  4. @DP111: In the end, I think there would be armed conflict in Europe rather than an Islamic state.

    Only the politicians can prevent it, but if Islam starts to dominate most people will not submit to it. Most of the people I know would rather fight and die than accept Islam.

    Britain and Europe isn't finished yet. In fact there have been many hopeful signs this year (PVV result, FPO results, SD in government, Merkel pointing out failure of multi-culti, etc). I'm still hopeful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *