/

/

/

/

/

Finland: Sauli Niinistö wants more censorship…….

Finland Pseudo Conservatives

Finland: Sauli Niinistö wants more censorship…….

By KGS6 years agoLeave a comment

This guy is a compete and utter disaster in regards to the concepts of liberty and freedom…

Sauli Niinistö wants more censorship

Huhtasaari: “Permission to disagree, permission to talk about things openly, permission to think aloud and permit to be wrong, something that sometimes meant, freedom of speech”

DOMESTIC Sat 25.11.2017 13:00

President of the Republic, Sauli Niinistö, held a lecture at the University of Turku on Tuesday at the “Peace at the Border” lecture and took a stand against hate speech, describing it as “a desire to misunderstand rather than to try to understand one another”.

“In particular, somewhere, it is visible, almost in a word, we want to misunderstand it,” Niinistö described the social media culture.

The President of the Republic also announced that he would also like to have control of the Finnish social media platforms which spread “hate speech” and “fake news”.

[…]

“It’s not a healthy society when there is only one official truth and opinions expressing different views are censored, or people are discriminated against as a result of their opinions.”

Huhtamaki emphasises that social media has given each a voice and the opportunity to bring forward their opinions. She was asking whether or not to replace Facebook with a new platform for freedom of opinion.

“There are already so many examples that is not a question of a technical accident. Freedom of expression has begun to be restricted. How far will this still go? ” she wonders.

It should be noted that many have no alternative distribution channels at their disposal and, according to Huhtamaki, in a democracy, everyone should have equal opportunity to highlight their ideas and their own values:

“You can’t change the world if you can’t be but of one mind. You can’t affect things if you’re not allowed to challenge hegemony. “

Huhtasaari deems a sustainable and democratic society is one that promises to disagree, promises to discuss matters openly, permission to think aloud and permission to be wrong.

“This it sometimes meant, freedom of speech”, the island of Huhtamaki specifies.

This is my choice for Finland’s president: Laura Huhtasaari

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.