Manfred Gerstenfeld Netherlands Wilders


If a private polling was done in the Netherlands with the question being, “Do you want less Moroccans in the country”, and only two boxes for yes and no, the latter would win hands down. Of course not all Moroccans are to blame, but enough of them are and it’s angering a lot of people.

kanagroo DUTCH court Geert Wilders

Dr.Gerstenfeld’s article on the Wilders process.  It was first published in INN and published here with the author’s consent.

The Wilders Process and the incompetent Dutch Justice System

Manfred Gerstenfeld

Dr.Manfred GerstenfeldA new legal proceeding against PVV leader Geert Wilders will start before the court in The Hague on 31 October.1 In 2014 he asked a group of the party’s sympathizers: “What do we want, more or less Moroccans?” The crowd shouted: “less Moroccans.”2 This response had a stereotypical element because it referred to Moroccans in general.

There is a disproportionately large number of Moroccans among suspects of criminality in the Netherlands in comparison with their two percent share in the population.3 Yet it is wrong to blame all Moroccans or hold them responsible for the attitudes of these individuals. Suggesting this, as the shouting seemed to indicate, expresses an ethnically racist opinion.

There are, however, more aspects to the context of this process than meet the eye. Some of these facets also indirectly relate to matters concerning Jews. First a few general issues. In October 2010 another legal process against Wilders started. The official prosecution accused him of insulting Muslims with various remarks in the media and with his anti-Koran movie Fitna.

The process turned into a major defeat for the Dutch justice system. Wilders’ lawyer succeeded to have the members of the first tribunal challenged and replaced in an early stage.4 In June 2011 the prosecution asked for Wilders’ acquittal and the judges came to the same conclusion.

When looked at in a wider context, the new Wilders process also draws attention to the extreme failure of the police and justice system of the Dutch democratic state. Wilders has needed permanent massive guarding already for 12 years. In 2004 Mohamed Bouyeri murdered the media person Theo Van Gogh. On the murderer’s computer plans were found to also kill Wilders. Last year Wilders thanked his guards that he is still alive.5

When he came to the office of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs some ten years ago I asked his Dutch bodyguards why there were only two of them. They answered: In Israel nothing happens. When he spoke at the Begin Center a few years later the number of Dutch bodyguards had already increased to six. In the Netherlands Wilders nowadays walks around with many more bodyguards. Even in the parliament building he requires special security.

The number of threats, including many death menaces that Wilders has received over the years is huge. Furthermore no other Dutch politician has had to endure such deprivation of privacy for such a long time.

If the Dutch police and justice system were reasonably adequate, hundreds of those who uttered threats against Wilders should be serving jail time. Hardly any however were condemned and the punishments meted out were minute.

The Dutch Moroccan rapper Mo$heb was, in 2009, sentenced to eighty hours of community service by the Rotterdam court and two months jail time on probation. He had threatened Wilders with death, including singing that if he would meet Wilders he would shoot him. A year later the appeal court in The Hague acquitted the rapper.6 The Supreme Court determined in 2012 that the court case had to be retried. Finally he was sentenced to forty hours of community service and one month jail time on probation.7 In 2014 the rapper Hozny, also a Muslim, was sentenced to eighty hours of community service and two months jail time on probation. In a video-clip Hozny suggested that Wilders should be taken hostage and executed because of his remarks about Islam.8

Over the past years the shouting of “death to the Jews” or the like by Dutch Muslims has been heard from time to time. One example which had no Jewish aspects was when in 2015 more than 100 people chanted “Jewish murderers” during riots that broke out in the Schilderswijk, a predominantly Muslim neighborhood of The Hague. This happened after a man who was arrested died in police custody. There are a few Jews who live in that neighborhood, in an enclave surrounded by low-income families.9 Rarely, or possibly never, have threats against Jews led to court condemnations.

A study among Dutch youth found far more anti-Semitism among young Muslims than among others of their age group. Worse even is the finding that seven percent of Muslim youths justified violence against Dutch Jews.10 There are at least twenty times more Muslim youth than Jewish youth in the Netherlands. The number of Muslim youth justifying violence against Jews thus significantly exceeds the total number of Jewish youth in the Netherlands.

The most severe anti-Semitic incident in the Netherlands was a robbery in 2015 perpetrated by criminals who appeared to be of Moroccan Arab descent. The victims were two Holocaust survivors in their mid-eighties in Amsterdam. The woman was a survivor of Auschwitz. The robbers called them “dirty Jews” and beat them severely.11 These criminals were never found.

The two largest Muslim communities in the Netherlands are the Turkish and the Moroccan communities. Each one numbers about one third of the approximately one million Dutch Muslims. A major study by the American Anti-Defamation League has found that the majority of adults in both of these countries of origin are anti-Semites.12

With parliamentary elections approaching in early 2017 the Wilders legal process may have an impact on the election outcome. His party’s program includes forbidding the Koran and closing all mosques in the Netherlands. In view of all the above, a fair process seems barely possible. On the one hand there are the statements that Wilders has made against an ethnic group. On the other hand there are the many far worse death threats Wilders has received, the impact they have had on his life, and the minute punishments meted out for the few condemned among those brought to justice. In conclusion: a sentence of one hour of community service for Wilders would be on the high side.



3 file:///D:/Users/user/Downloads/criminaliteit-en-rechtshandhaving-2014.pdf





10 Anne Frank Stichting en Verwey-Jonker Instituut, april 2015, 33. Ron van Wonderen and Willem Wagenaar, Antisemitisme onder jongeren in Nederland, Oorzaken en Triggerfactoren.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.