/

/

/

/

/

JAN SJUNNESSON: BLOCK A BEGGAR, RECLAIM THE STREETS OF SWEDEN ONE STREET AT A TIME…….

JAN SJUNNESSON: BLOCK A BEGGAR, RECLAIM THE STREETS OF SWEDEN ONE STREET AT A TIME…….

By KGS8 years ago1

This article was written by Jan Sjunnesson. H/T: Ingrid Carlqvist

BLOCK BEGGARS – RECLAIM THE STREETS

12/28/2015 JANUARY SJUNNESSON

NOTE: This is a non-violence oriented proposal based on passive resistance and civil courage. Nothing else. Moreover, it is my own initiative, neither of Avpixlat or the SD. I take responsibility for this, for something certainly controversial and unpleasant but according to me, a necessary text.

If you really want to remove beggars and have not received support from the authorities nor from your locality, you have to act yourself. Preferably together with some like-minded but otherwise alone.

[…]

What to do:
You get in front of the beggars who annoys you want to send away. Stand next to or in front of their paper cup and plate, not on their things. It could otherwise be used against you. They know exactly what rights they have concerning them or their things.

Standing a few inches from them so that they are blocked, but no closer. If they move against you, you have won and can accuse them of harassment, which is a FUSSY method they use but was willing to call 112 if they were messing too much and push on your legs.

You simply block their activity with your body until they move.Then follow after. If they pack up you have won.

I tested this awkward but effective method on the pedestrian street of Drottninggatan in Stockholm, at Brommaplan. I just stood there until they grumbled and moved themselves on . They did not call to their organization’s minions, and if they do it, you have won for when they commit crimes, if they shove you away because they harass you by touching you.

You have the right to stand wherever you want and apparently a beggar’s right to sit wherever they want as long as they are in a public place. If located inside the metro gains could call the SL and complain, the same thing in the shopping mall. Or just stand in front of them until they get bored and go out.

If you are reading this and are doing this, tell me how it went. Write in the comment field.

More here in Swedish.

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.