FINLAND INTENDS TO DROP NUMBER OF REFUGEES COMING INTO THE COUNTRY…….

These people would be better suited to be held at an island off the coast of Italy and Greece until the fighting stops, then repatriated. Financially better able to help more people without it affecting the host countries in Europe.

In accordance with the Government Programme, Finland intends to maintain the number of quota refugees at least to the level of previous years. Orpo interprets the program entry, so that in subsequent years the number of quota refugees could be taken to drop this year from 1050 to 750 quota refugees.

Finland does not increase its refugee quota due to Greece and Italy

Published: 12.6. 18:40

Asylum applicants cost of at least EUR 4.5 million.

Finland is not increasing its annual refugee quota as a result of the additional measures proposed by the EU Commission. According to the Government through the so-called emergency mechanism for asylum-seekers in Greece and Italy previous years refugee numbers are included. 750-1050 quota refugees are to be taken by Finland.

The Commission argues that Finland would take over two years nearly 800 asylum-seekers who arrive over the Mediterranean to Greece and Italy. The Interior Ministry estimates that of these applicants up to 75 per cent would be granted a residence permit.

The Grand Committee of the Parliament approved on Friday the government’s position that, in principle, internal transfers should be voluntary.

Italy and Greece are in a difficult situation, however, the EU Commission is planning the allocation of asylum seekers in Member States, and according to the interior minister Peter Orpon (Nat.), the it seems obvious that the majority of member states are willing to accept this.

Future Mediterranean Sea asylum seekers will have an economic impact on Finland, so we have in the coming years to reduce the number of quota refugees, Interior Minister, says the Ministry of Interior provisionally estimated that asylum seekers from Greece and Italy will cost Finland at least 4.5 million.

More here in Finnish.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Jun 15, 2015

“…These people would be better suited to be held at an island off the coast of Italy and Greece until the fighting stops, then repatriated…”

An excellent idea! Just supply them with food and shelter and leave them on an island completely to their own devices. What a treat for Swedich social engineers – a testbed that could show by example how islam creates the perfect society between harmoni0us muslims from several cultures and races. No need for the ‘immigrants’ to sully themselves by having to talk to infidels.

What??? You don’t think it would happen??

You cynic, you islamophobe!!!
1. By KGS Jun 15, 2015
  
  🙂

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply