/

/

/

/

/

ISLAMIC STATE CLAIMS CALIPH’S DEATH WOULD NOT PROVE FATAL FOR GROUP…….

ISLAMIC STATE CLAIMS CALIPH’S DEATH WOULD NOT PROVE FATAL FOR GROUP…….

By KGS9 years agoLeave a comment

So taking out as large of a portion of them as possible is a must.

Terrorism: Gulf forum on security, threat not only from ISIS

”If the Islamic State is at the moment attracting most of the international attention among terror groups, Al Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood also represent a threat and the attention must not be taken away from connections between different groups, according to participants at the Future Security of the GCC Forum: Fighting Extremism.”

ISIS: “Caliph’s death would not prove lethal for group”

Yet analysts are divided. Names of potential successors

12 NOVEMBER, 11:08

(by Lorenzo Trombetta) (ANSAmed) – BEIRUT, NOVEMBER 12 – Arab observers are divided between those describing the Islamic State (ISIS) as a monster with many heads, and thus able to regenerate leaders, or an organization relying entirely on its chief, ”caliph” Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. They are also divided in figuring out the potential short and long-term repercussions of his possible death on the jihadist group present in Iraq and Syria.

So far allegations, re-launched yesterday by Egyptian daily al Ahram among others, that the leader has possibly been wounded or killed in US-led Coalition air raids have not been confirmed.

The air raids were carried out between last Friday and Saturday in northern Iraq, close to Mosul.

”It is reductive to state that ISIS can do without Baghdadi by simply replacing him at the helm of the organization”, wrote yesterday pan Arab daily al Quds al Arabi.

”It’s like saying the Islamic State is a group with several autonomous local leaderships, without considering the political and personal strength of Baghdadi”.

Measuring the relevance the self-proclaimed caliph has within ISIS has led many to wonder how the organization is structured after it turned, in just two years, from the Iraqi arm of al Qaida to a pseudo-State entity able to challenge regional and international powers.

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.