Ladonia has more going for it than Paleostinia.
Certainly Ms Wallstrom’s assertion that the international criteria for recognition of the State of Palestine have been satisfied – are rebutted by the clear terms of article 1 the Montevideo Convention 1934 – which expressly provide:
“The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:
a) a permanent population;
b) a defined territory;
c) government; and
d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.”
Failure to even mention that there must be a permanent population before Sweden can possibly begin the diplomatic process of recognising the State of Palestine indicates the incredulity that Ms Wallstrom’s announcement has produced.
Op-Ed: ‘Palestine’ and Sweden In Ikea La-La-Land
Published: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:30 AM
Sweden Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom’s announcement on October 30th that Sweden has recognized the ‘State of Palestine’ elicited a response from Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman that will surely go down as one of the most memorable diplomatic quotes of 2014:
“It is too bad that the government of Sweden has chosen to adopt the measure that does a lot of damage and has no benefits. Sweden must understand that relations in the Middle East are much more complicated than self-assembly furniture at Ikea”
Ms Wallstrom’s reasons for justifying Sweden’s incredible decisionwere:
“The Government considers that the international law criteria for the recognition of the State of Palestine have been satisfied.
“There is a territory, albeit with non-defined borders. There is also a population. And there is a government with the capacity for internaland external control….
“The Government’s assessment that the international law criteria have been fulfilled is shared by international law experts, including Professor Ove Bring, Professor Said Mahmoudi and Professor Pål Wrange, who recently wrote an opinion piece on this subject in Dagens Nyheter (20 October).”
It seems inconceivable that academics, i.e. Professor Bring, Professor Mahmoudi and Professor Wrange, could have reached the conclusions attributed to them by Ms Wallstroms.
Hopefully someone conversant in the Swedish language might be kind enough to post a translation in English to verify what they actually wrote.