FINNISH PM STUBB ON BBC HARDTALK: ERKKI TUOMIOJA IS A GOOD FOREIGN MINISTER, THERE’S NO DOUBT ABOUT IT……!

Alexander Stubb Finland Finnish Politics

FINNISH PM STUBB ON BBC HARDTALK: ERKKI TUOMIOJA IS A GOOD FOREIGN MINISTER, THERE’S NO DOUBT ABOUT IT……!

Just another one of those reasons, as to why I cannot take these European, neo-statists seriously. Also, the European parliamentary system that allows for coalition governments. They suck.

Being interviewed by the UK’s BBC, Finnish Prime Minister (and former EU MEP lap dog hack politician) Alexander Stubb, was asked about the recent statements made by Finnish FM, Erkki Tuomioja, concerning Russia that greatly differs from his government’s position,

”..But the Minister of Foreign Affairs is still in his position, Sackur wondered, though the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister are in complete disagreement with this fundamental issue. Why wasn’t the FM sacked?

Yle: Since we have a coalition government, I can not dismiss another party’s ministers. In any case, he is a very good minister, there is no doubt about it. He just happened to have different views on this. Secondly, we felt the timing to be problematic, since a cease-fire had just started. We were wondering if we could maybe buy two or three days and see how things will be resolved. We got them a couple, three additional days, the dispute is not resolved, and then we stood behind the sanctions, Stubb clarified.

Again, this is the reason why I reject this fake conservative PM, he’s always been an ”EU first” kind of politician, as well as being more than willing to work with Marxists such as the fellow hack politico, Tuomioja. To be fair, Finnish consensus driven politics preceded the man, with its multi-party coalition governments, but the facts remain, both suck.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Jack Spratt Oct 09, 2014

I must say that I have found Stubbs writings for the Finnair magazine very amusing. He has a good sense of humour, for instance, for suggesting that the downfall of Nokia is good for Finland as all those now unemployed can start their own companies. So far only one Angry Bird !
By Jack Spratt Oct 10, 2014

Oh dear, it seems my prediction came true. Having watched Hardtalk it seems he did relate the downfall of Nokia to the creation of Angry Birds. This is beyond parody.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply