Global Warming



Chuck being Chuck, He’s got it backwards, it’s the GW enthusiasts who are the headless chickens.

No doubt if his position wouldn’t forbid him, he’d join the others singing their songs of sorrow and sobbing to the forests of the world.

Prince of Wales hits out at climate change deniers… labelling them the ‘headless chicken brigade’

  • Prince Charles spoke out over ‘sheer intimidation’ of anti-climate change groups
  • Said they turn scientific wisdom on its head to suit their own purposes
  • Was speaking at an event for young entrepreneurs at Buckingham Palace


PUBLISHED: 18:44 GMT, 31 January 2014 | UPDATED: 20:41 GMT, 31 January 2014

Inflammatory: Charles said climate change denies use 'intimidation' to get their point across

Inflammatory: Charles said climate change denies use ‘intimidation’ to get their point across

Climate change deniers are headless chickens, Prince Charles has claimed.

In an inflammatory speech, the heir to the throne spoke out against ‘the barrage of sheer intimidation’ from what he described as powerful interest groups.

Addressing young environmental entrepreneurs at Buckingham Palace, he said sceptics were turning accepted scientific wisdom on its head.

He said: ‘It is baffling that in our modern world we have such blind trust in science and technology that we all accept what science tells us about everything – until, that is, it comes to climate science. All of a sudden, and with a barrage of sheer intimidation, we are told by powerful groups of deniers that the scientists are wrong and we must abandon all our faith in so much overwhelming scientific evidence.

‘So, thank goodness for our young entrepreneurs here, who have the far-sightedness and confidence in what they know is happening to ignore the headless chicken brigade and do something practical to help.’

Charles was announcing the winner of a sustainability prize designed to inspire young people to tackle environmental, social and health issues.

Read more:

NOTE: What really is happening, or at least a far more plausible explanation:

3 Responses

  1. As you rightly point out, it is the Warmists who for the last decade have been running around like panicked headless chickens, that if we didn’t do this or that, the sky would fall in.

  2. Wonderful science and wonderful journalism.
    This work deserves Nobel Prize!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.