Vote this guy out in November if you value your free speech.

Thank you Andy for helping the average person see through the haze and focus in like a laser on what is at stake here, nothing short of the defense of free speech from tyrants, foreign and abroad.

Andy: “Is this the absurdly elastic—and anti-intellectual, anti-Western—“standard” Mr. Obama has in mind? If so, Mr. Obama has declared himself a willing accomplice to the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s relentless campaign ^[31] to impose universal Sharia-compliant blasphemy law, and the destruction of America’s bedrock freedom, freedom of speech.”

Obama, “the prophet of Islam”, and Slander

Posted By Andrew Bostom On September 26, 2012

During his speech to the UN General Assembly yesterday (Tuesday, 9/25/12) Mr. Obama proclaimed ^[1],

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

He rapidly cloaked this bold statement regarding Islam, alone, with a pretense of ecumenism, by adding ^[1]

But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

This latter statement rings hollow. Mr. Obama and his State Department have never condemned, let alone actively sought to preclude—in real time and with specificity—the ongoing Muslim jihadist ravages ^[2] against Christians and other non-Muslims across the length and breadth of Islamdom, often perpetrated by so-called US “Muslim allies,” and/or purveyors of “moderate Islam.”  Even on the domestic front, one still awaits ^[3] any Obama administration commentary on the “Piss Christ” revival, an exhibit originally funded in part ^[4] by the National Endowment for the Arts—particularly in light of their endless condemnation of the previously marginal, amateurish video, “Innocence of Muslims ^[5].”

Moreover, Mr. Obama, as is his (and his administration’s) wont, ignored altogether the virulent Muslim Jew-hatred ^[6] borne of canonical Islam, that is both endemic and epidemic within Islamdom, and has nothing to do with “Holocaust denial.”  For example, when Mr. Obama delivered his June 4, 2009 Cairo speech ^[7], he opened by lavishly praising Al-Azhar University’s “thousand years” as “a beacon of Islamic learning.” Yet just 6-months earlier, a front page New York Times ^[8] story (published 1/10/ 2009), included extracts from the Friday (1/9/2009) Al Azhar mosque sermon at this same pinnacle of Sunni Islamic religious education, pronounced by Egyptian-government appointed cleric Sheik Eid Abdel Hamid Youssef. Referencing well-established Antisemitic motifs from the Koran (citations provided, below), Sheikh Youssef intoned,

Muslim brothers, God has inflicted the Muslim nation with a people whom God has become angry at [Koran 1:7 ^[9]] and whom he cursed [Koran5:78 ^[10]] so he made monkeys and pigs [Koran 5:60 ^[11]] out of them. They killed prophets and messengers [Koran 2:61 ^[12] / 3:112 ^[13]] and sowed corruption on Earth. [Koran 5:33 ^[14] / 5:64 ^[15]] They are the most evil on Earth. [5:62 ^[16]  /63 ^[17]]

[…]

The great Orientalist David S. Margoliouth’s 1905 biography of Islam’s prophet ^[27] recognized Muhammad as “ . . . a great man, who solved a political problem of appalling difficulty—the construction of a state and empire out of the Arab tribes.” Margoliouth recounted this accomplishment without “apology” or “indictment,” summarizing faithfully the images of Muhammad that emerge in the earliest and most authoritative pious Muslim biography of the Muslim prophet by Ibn Ishaq ^[28] (d. 761/767)

In order to gain his ends he recoils from no expedient, and he approves of similar unscrupulousness on the part of his adherents, when exercised in his interest. He profits to the utmost from the chivalry of the Meccans, but rarely requites it with the like. He organizes assassinations and wholesale massacres. 

His career as tyrant of Medina is that of a robber chief, whose political economy consists in securing and dividing plunder . . . He is himself an unbridled libertine and encourages the same passion in his followers. For whatever he does he is prepared to plead the express authorization of the deity. It is, however, impossible to find any doctrine which he is not prepared to abandon in order to secure a political end…This is a disagreeable picture for the founder of a religion, and it cannot be pleaded that it is a picture drawn by an enemy…

Read the rest of Andy’s excellent piece is here.