Finland Finnish Culture




According to the Finnish justice system, you might as well get used to the reality of being found guilty of a ‘crime’ for merely defending yourself during an attack, if you ever have the misfortune of encountering one, or just succumb to your attacker willingly, with hope of coming out of it alive…and not being brought up on charges.

H/T Vasarahammer

Intense torture – a woman’s eyes threatened of being punctured

Wednesday 04/25/2012 at 11:15

Iltalehti: The prosecutor demanded for the two men and one woman a term of imprisonment for a unusual series of events.

The events began in Heinola, when the thirty year old men just released from jail, bound the 22-year-old woman and handcuffed her to a chair. The men demanded the woman to give them her online banking account ID and threatened to the woman’s eyes, if she didn’t reveal the code. The woman finally gave the code, but the account was empty, so the robbery remained an attempted robbery.

The apartment was also a scene of violence. One of the men had beaten the woman, choking, hitting and throwing her against the wall.

Trying to get out of the house she eventually took hold of the knife and struck the other man’ in the chest. The man received a stab wound of about eight centimeters deep. At the same time she struck another man with her fist in the head.

Men were suspected of, among other things, attempted robbery, imprisonment and assault. The woman for her role received a charge of aggravated assault.

The prosecutor demanded for the men 7 and 6 months of mandatory prison sentences. The prosecutor presented the woman with a 1-year and 2-month unconditional prison sentence (probation).


10 Responses

  1. A similar thing happened to me back in 2004, my neighbour, Muhammed as it goes, started punching me in the head. So I did what any red blooded Englishman would do and beat the fucker senseless. As he is black and Im white, and both the cid interveiwing me were black I ended up with a suspended sentance!

  2. Coincidentally, yesterday evening I was browsing “The SAS Self-Defense Handbook: A Complete Guide to Unarmed Combat Techniques” by John ‘Lofty’ Wiseman on Amazon.


  3. This is a typical case of police services resorting to politicised “inverted racism” (AKA: humanitarian racism) enforced top-down by self-proclaimed political elites.

    “Such humanitarian racists think—usually without expressing it explicitly sometimes not even being conscious of it—that only white people can be fully responsible for their actions while nonwhites cannot (or can but only to a limited extent).”

    “A humanitarian racist is best defined as someone who attributes intrinsically reduced responsibility for their acts to people of certain ethnic or national groups. This racism is a mirror image of the white-supremacist variety. Humanitarian racists consider—usually without saying so explicitly—that only white people can be fully responsible for their actions; nonwhites such as the Palestinians cannot (or can but only to a limited extent). Therefore, most misdeeds by nonwhites— who by definition are “victims”—are not their fault but those of whites, who can be held accountable. One of the many consequences of this distorted attitude is that nonwhites are falsely perceived as passive victims, never acting, only acted upon or reacting. As humanitarian racism has hardly been investigated, the many ramifications of this discriminatory attitude are also ignored. One of these is that by considering certain people unable to be fully responsible for their actions by nature, one implicitly degrades them to a subhuman status and ascribes to them characteristics found in animals. They cannot be held responsible because they cannot overcome their urges and are not expected to have rationality or morality. One among many resulting distortions of humanitarian racism is the confusion of criminals and victims. Another is an inversion of perpetrator and victim. These scantly studied phenomena are related to other false beliefs such as that the problems caused by certain hooligans among non-Western immigrants in European societies are solely the result of socioeconomic factors. Very often criminal inclinations and antiwhite racist ideology are also at play.”

    “Ignoring minority racism is yet another collateral phenomenon of humanitarian racism.”

    So, truth be told, PC useful idiots

    1) attribute animalistic characteristics and diminished accountability to members of other ethnicities in order to
    2) help further the public victimization in the media of the already self-proclaimed victims (AKA Muslims, mostly) in order to
    3) absolve these people of any type of responsibility for their actions

    Therefore, proponents of PC / MC apologetics are themselves the biggest racists around in this day and age. Compare this attitude for instance with the paternalistic 19th century view of Ernest Renan (28 February 1823 – 2 October 1892)

    “Nature has made a race of workers, the Chinese race, who have wonderful manual dexterity and almost no sense of honor…A race of tillers of the soil, the Negro; treat him with kindness and humanity, and all will be as it should; a race of masters and soldiers, the European race. Reduce this noble race to working in the ergastulum like Negros and Chinese, and they rebel… But the life at which our workers rebel would make a Chinese or a fellah happy, as they are not military creatures in the least. Let each one do what he is made for, and all will be well.”

    and you will find that the PC/MC elites’ disdainful attitude of humanitarian racism towards the “noble savage” exactly mirrors the same attitude of 19th century Western intellectuals living in the colonial Golden Age !!!

    1. Hope it’s okay to share what you’ve written … very well said and something that needs to be made ‘viral’ on the internet.

      Thank you.

  4. It is hard to imagine that defending oneself from attack could be a crime.

    Only in European utopia.

    Here in the US, I regularly take the 9mm handgun to the range. Don’t bother me at night.

    1. That’s just effeminate European policy makers for you. Sad but true, they are all morally bankrupt. The only thing they’re good at is creating tail-between-the-legs policies and enriching themselves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.