Andrew Bostom Islam 101 ISLAM IN THE USA Sharia



Oh and remember, Krispy Kream* Chris Christie says anyone who criticizes his, or any other Muslim appointees to US courts… are the crazy ones.

An American ‘Kadi’ in Pennsylvania’s Court

Kadi: the judge, who, according to the theory of Muslim law [sharia], has to decide all cases involving cases of civil and criminal law.

Responding with self-righteous indignation this past August 2011 to queries about his judicial appointment of Sohail Mohammed, a Muslim, New Jersey governor Chris Christie proclaimed, “Ignorance is behind the criticism of Sohail Mohammed.” He added, peevishly, that his “sharia-[Islamic]law business is crap… and I’m tired of dealing with the crazies!”

But Christie’s uninformed and defamatory diatribe willfully ignored that Mr. Mohammed was a board member of the cultural jihadist American Muslim Union (AMU) organization, and personal attorney for AMU’s Mohammed Qatanani, an admitted member of Hamas, whose covenantal goal is the jihad genocide of Israel’s Jewish population.

Of course, having been deliberately blind and politically pandering enough—given New Jersey’s large Muslim community—to ignore these alarming connections to jihadism, it was easy for the disingenuous governor to angrily dismiss any potential concerns about Mr. Mohammed’s predilection for applying sharia in his judicial decisions, as opposed to antithetical US constitutional law.

More here.

NOTE* Christie’s nome de guerre coined by radio talk show host, Mark Levin.

5 Responses

  1. posted a weak response from Martin.

    Unless the audio tape & transcript of the hearing was altered, Martin’s refutation is full of holes and further opens questions to his credibility.

    Considering Martin was RE-elected to a six year term on the bench, after running un-opposed, he stated :

    ” out of respect to people with faiths other than Christianity, I DO have a Quran on the bookcase BESIDE my bench, and am trying to acquire a Torah, Book of Mormon, Book of Confucius and any other artifacts which those with a faith might respect).”

    So, after 6+ years on the bench as an elected magistrate, it appears his attempt was weak at best.
    Why didn’t this ‘judge’ equally lecture Talaag Elbayomy against physically assaulting Ernest Perce, an act which is against the cultural norms of this society and it’s Constitutional laws ? Why didn’t this ‘judge’ refuse to enter the video of this incident into evidence? Too many holes. If not to intimidate, why lecture on sharia remedies of other nations? To claim he didn’t threaten Perce with jail because Martin only mentioned a potential charge of ‘contempt’ if Perce released the audio for public consumption – is beyond pathetic. Remove Martin from the bench immediately.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.