ESW Frontpagemag



In living color!

The buffoonery of the Austrian government doesn’t involve just its massive trade dealings with the rogue Iranian regime, it also consists of systematically persecuting its own citizens daring to speak up about Islam. Do you think that they’re connected in any way? KGS

The Political Persecution of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

On February 15, 2011, the Austrian Counterjihad activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted of “hate speech” in a Vienna courtroom for what she said in a private seminar about Muhammad and Islam.

The original charge was “incitement to hatred”. On the second day of her trial, the judge at her own discretion added a second charge, “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion.” Elisabeth was acquitted of the first charge, but convicted of the second. She was sentenced to pay a fine of €480. Her case is currently being appealed to Austria’s highest court. If the verdict is upheld, and she refuses to pay the fine, she will spend two months in jail.

How could this happen in a modern European democratic state which recognizes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and enshrines the right to free speech in its Constitution?

Read the rest at FrontPage Mag

4 Responses

  1. Islam needs to be declared a cult. Otherwise you are sanctioning criminal behavior.

  2. Runne 7500. Islam is an officially recognized religion in Austria. Whatever that is supposed to mean.

    This ruling was based upon a lie. Ms Wolfe told someone that it is against the law to call Muhammad a pedophile. The judge used that exact sentance to say Ms. Wolfe called him a pedophile, thus denegrating a state recogized religion. See the problem with that ruling?

    The evidence showed ms wolfe said one thing but she could not be found guilty because of that so the judge then claimed she said the exact opposite of what she said in the submitted evidence.

    It is like finding someone guilty of murder because they tell people committing murder is against the law.

    That showes this was a stalinist style show trial. Someone wanted Ms. Wolfe found guilty for anything and gave this judge the job of figuring out how it could be done. It could not be done based upon the evidence so the judge claimed the evidence meant the exact opposite of what it meant.

    There is no subtlety here, no context and no deeper meaning. The judge claimed Ms. Wolfe said the exact opposite of what was in the submitted evidence then based a ruling upon that. The judge said that by telling people they cannot call Muhammad a pedophile, Ms. Wolfe was calling him a pedohile – then found her guilty because she called him a peodphile. I am not extrapolating or interpreting, that was what the judge said.

    The fat lying bitch needs to be removed from the bench. Prosecuted if possible or sued for slander or libel if possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.