FINNISH GREENS EX-SPOKESMAN CALLS RIVAL PARTY POLITICAL PARASITES…….

Finnish Politics Osmo Soininvaara The Finns

FINNISH GREENS EX-SPOKESMAN CALLS RIVAL PARTY POLITICAL PARASITES…….

The Tundra Tabloids can only wish for this statist ‘fecal head’ to crawl back under the slimy rock from which he came. Always keeping it classy, right Osmo?

Osmo Soininvaara: “The True Finns are political parasites”

The highly respected Finnish blogger, Kumitonttu, gives the Tundra Tabloids the heads up on a statement by well known Finnish ex-politician from the Greens party, Osmo Soininvaara, who has a history of making all kinds of equally troubling statements.

Though he now operates from a private capacity, he still remains an influential voice in Finnish politics, unfortunately. In a Helsingin Sanomat column, Heikki Aittokoski, makes mention of a recent statement by Soininvaara that reveals this fecal head’s mindset. He’s a statist for sure, as well as sharing an affinity for the words and ideas of another failed, statist ideology, the referred to a certain people as rats and vermin.

In short, the man is both an embarrassment as well as a menace. KGS

Heikki Aittokoski:

Finns truly live in their own detached reality. It is also reflected in political rhetoric, which is devoid of any sense of history. Last Friday, Osmo Soininvaara (Green) revealed an elegant attitude towards the True Finns party, who criticized them as “political parasites. “

Such a thing can be mentioned in Finland without a worry. What did it matter that the parasitic animal was favored by the National Socialists in the characterization of the Jews.

OS: For me, a parasite is a purely an ecological term, which does not involve a greater emotional charge than the decay of fungi. The word parasite has quite different connotations in my opinion. But if parasite is commonly equated as a bloodsucker, I guess I will have to start using other, unfortunately, longer terminology.

NOTE: The man shows that he has no clear understanding of history, and the ramifications for the use of such terminology. Stunning.

Written by KGS

One Response

By Kumitonttu Mar 27, 2011

I don’t believe it’s a coincidence that these Green-Lefties call those, who dare to oppose their theory of Global Warming, as denialists (The denialists are believers). I don’t say they use the same words and phrases on purpose – because that would make them look even more idiotic – but it is very describing how theyFIND those same words so easily for the same purpose.

In this piece of news the spokesman of the Left admits that he considered joining the Greenies 12 years ago. Who do they fool?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply Cancel reply