NOW THAT HIS NUMBERS ARE SLIPPING OBAMA REACHES OUT TO AMERICAN JEWS…….

Obamanation: My nice offensive is real,

don’t doubt it or I’ll really screw you

Obama is a pathetic liar and a political chameleon. Caroline Glick nailed it shut yesterday on Obama’s sudden turn-around “nice offensive” towards Israel’s head of state, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

His numbers are slipping among American Jews which spells a “big bad” for Dems running in elections this November, so all of a sudden, out comes the red carpet and smiles for the Israeli leader. Netanyahu is not stupid, he and his cabinet knows what the score is and will shake the Obamanation’s hand, but will carry some ready wipes in their pockets.

Here’s the J’lem Post article first, then a few words by Glick followed with a link to her column, she’s got this guy pegged to a tee. KGS

Obama: Singling out Israel wrong

US President Barack Obama on Saturday welcomed the “balanced” nuclear non-proliferation accord reached Friday at a UN conference but criticized the singling out of Israel in the document. Obama said the document “includes balanced and practical steps that will advance non-proliferation, nuclear disarmament, and peaceful uses of nuclear energy, which are critical pillars of the global non-proliferation regime.” But, he said, “we strongly oppose efforts to single out Israel, and will oppose actions that jeopardize Israel’s national security.”

Caroline Glick: Netanyahu, Obama’s latest prop

The Democratic Party is feeling the heat for US President Barack Obama’s hostility towards Israel. In an interview with Channel 10earlier this month, Democratic Party mega-donor Haim Saban characterized the Obama administration as ideologically aligned with the radical Left and harshly criticized its treatment of Israel.

Both Ma’ariv and Yediot Aharonot reported this week that Democratic congressmen and senators are deeply concerned that the administration’s harsh treatment of Israel has convinced many American Jews not to contribute to their campaigns or to the Democratic Party ahead of November 2’s mid-term elections. They also fear that American Jews will vote for Republican challengers in large numbers.

It is these concerns, rather than a decision to alter his positions on Israel specifically and the Middle East generally, that now drive Obama’s relentless courtship of the American Jewish community. His latest move in this sphere was his sudden invitation to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to visit him at the White House for a “warm reception” in front of television cameras next Tuesday.

It is clear that electoral worries rather than policy concerns are behind what the White House has described as a “charm offensive,” because since launching this offensive a few weeks ago, Obama not changed any of his policies towards Israel and the wider Middle East.

In fact, he has ratcheted up these policies to Israel’s detriment.

Continue reading here.

Written by KGS

One Response

By There is NO Santa Claus May 29, 2010

In the upcoming "Be nice to Israel" campaign, I doubt President O'Bama will win back many of the Jewish-American voters who have since deserted him. That being said, 47% of Jewish Americans still support President O'Bama. The exercise is to keep them in the Democratic Party camp.

I think the term is: "damage control".

Barack O'Bama has let the cat out of the bag at least three times already wrt his unsupportive policy toward Israel.

First came the campaign controversy with his church and Rev. Wright. Then came Jesse Jackson's comments after the election victory saying Israel was now in big trouble and the transition team's response of "Rev. Jackson doesn't speak for us". (They could have just said it was totally untrue.) Then came the phone conference with Netanyahu after the Cairo speech. Then came the Biden/Jerusalem flap.

I certainly think it's fair to say that there have been previous Presidents who supported Israel more than this one. I talked to PRIMERPREZ (who you know) a little while back to get his take on the AIPAC policy conference which he attended. As could be expected, nobody at the AIPAC policy conference could show any contentment with the President's policy toward Israel.

That being said, there's some damage control going on in Israel as well. Israel does NOT want the world to perceive that U.S. support for them is weak. As such, it makes diplomatic sense for PM Netanyahu to give President O'Bama a chance to say: "The United States supports Israel".

That being the case, I hope PM Netanyahu takes the opportunity to point out publicly this one little thing: in the face of nuclear weapons in Iran, missiles in Lebanon, and suicide bombers next door, there are a lot worse things going on in the Middle East than a few Jews building homes on our ancestral lands. The O'Bama Administration needs to change their priorities.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply Cancel reply