Opinion Poll: Scandinavians Not Interested in Moving to Finland…….

It’s unclear however, whether it accurately depicts Nordic opinions about moving to Finland, if the question was posed differently, the responses might be more favorable. Taken at face value, the poll serves the current political policy of increased immigration by anyone from anywhere in the world that’s willing to make the move.

The TT also suspects that if questioned in the proper way, you would find Swedes or Norwegians more willing to think about Finland, especially when they realize that Finland has a sizable Swedish speaking minority in Helsinki, Turku and Vaasa. But inducing the peoples from neighboring states is not the answer, it never was.

As long as the Nordic states refuse to embark on a policy of promoting the badly needed increase in their own domestic birth rates, the multiculturalists will continue to use the aging workforce as a wedge to radically change their own ethnic homogeneous societies through mass immigration. Government planners need to be picky over what immigrants are best suited for the Finnish job market. One important criteria for the politicians to mull over, is that potential immigrants to Finland need to be driven for success in the job market, not in the crime statistics. KGS

Scandinavians do not want to move to Finland

Finland is not favored by other Nordic residents. A recent opinion poll showed that in Denmark only one in a hundred wanted to to live in Finland – and interest in the rest of the Nordic countries are not any greater than that. Of Swedes interviewed, four percent would be willing to move to Finland, Norwegians, only two percent. Icelanders were not included in the study.

The question posed: “If you should choose another Nordic country in which to live, where would it be?”

The Finns would like to move, preferably to Sweden, the main destination for Finnish immigrants in the 60’s and 70’s. 41 percent of Finnish respondents mentioned Sweden as the consensus target. In second place Finns chose Norway – a high figure (30 percent), explained by the fact that the country has recently improved the salary for nurses coming from Finland”

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Henrik Apr 10, 2009

Finland is a solid, Nordic country. I’ve lived there and there are a lot of good things about the country. But all the Nordic countries are in the same boat, we all need people. Either we have to reproduce better or we have to do without. Importing human beings in the belief that inside every human being there is a Scandinavian ready to pop out is a big mistake.

There’s unemployment in Germany, though. They could be ready to come.
By Vasarahammer Apr 10, 2009

The Danes tend to think that Finland is too cold place to live. The language is also a huge barrier for all Nordics even though there’s a vibrant Swedish-language culture around here.

Personally, I like a decent winter that you don’t get if you live in Denmark.

Leave a Reply to Henrik Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply to Henrik Cancel reply