United Nations Wants To Regulate Free Speech Of Every Nation

Thanks to the OIC, the largest block within the UN, the move to silence all critics of Islam is gaining speed. What’s it going to take to get people to stand up and take notice that their right to speak their minds is being slowly but surely curtailed?! KGS

Wake the hell up people!

UPDATE: Why in the world couldn’t Kitty Pilgrim answer Lou Dobbs’ question:

Lou Dobbs: “Of those 57 nations supporting this resolution, how many of them are a democracies?

Kitty Pilgrim: “I couldn’t tell you, but.. many of them are Islamic countries.. uh..Pakistan has led the charge on this and has ..uh.. tabled this resolution…

Fortunately Dobbs has the presence of mind to help her out with that most basic of questions.

Lou Dobbs: So they’re not democracies, and they’re facinated with their own precepts about what would constitute the way to run a nation “not like ours”.

Is there any discussion, perhaps, of simply, if the United Nations insists on doing this, sort of bulldozing the building, getting it out of the way and letting them go find another place to live?

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By T2 Mar 01, 2009

Excellent post, pretty grim though.

Essentially this has already been implemented in Finland. I’m suprised you have not been harassed by the authorities or heckled by members of Islamic communities.

It seems that the most serious offence in Finland today is criticizing Islam, local immigration policy or immigration in general. Equally amusing is that the powers that be and the people have more or less the exact opposite views on the matter.

What baffles me is the point in this? I mean there has to be one, right? Who gains in all this? Obviously the muslems, but I mean that someone who is pushing for multiculturalism must have some agenda to do so. Or can it really be just childish belief that “We’ll all just get along”. Or is it the trend to be absolutely open to everything without considering f the consequences or even turning a blind eye to them.
By Robert Laity Oct 03, 2010

Go to this site for information on UN nations that are Free or Not Free:
//www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=505

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.